From patchwork Sat Oct 13 04:53:31 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Frank Rowand X-Patchwork-Id: 983454 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42XClY5G0fz9s3l for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:23:05 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Edv51Tm5"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42XClY3jqkzF3Tw for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:23:05 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Edv51Tm5"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::643; helo=mail-pl1-x643.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Edv51Tm5"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x643.google.com (mail-pl1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::643]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42XC7X149mzF3VK for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:55:20 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x643.google.com with SMTP id c8-v6so6812190plo.9 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 21:55:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=1eIq+bpAJjW92EtiaqYATBx5CfeVYNbB6/35CF3TsEg=; b=Edv51Tm5V+YnME4rTFQTKB40mZvmwboEh9HvLGiqvuiyZiH9Cp4Kost2sdbjNoYb4i tZexQpai48vDDvNZXqGzyPpes38YGfx7gqYLHsU74Y/t/8qlsA6toCz0PEdOaR5hZKAu X4tHVB4keiunliqmKHH3wQ0LEbl+ItUWJVlblRO2k0SjGu93yg99C+S14v9otBIohJKU rl4hphaqE2Z+NzWThHWzyRgjFiFk1AR+muRq4R5/TFHJWGZqmHIZnIQbgTHJZUJJINrJ ghENYWIquz6CzE3ETEX4jB4CpwmCU4ofZy33jLs72JeL4Q8A0Em9rgBiwRwo9kk4PEdA chsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=1eIq+bpAJjW92EtiaqYATBx5CfeVYNbB6/35CF3TsEg=; b=CpjLJc8j8ougYq0WWYomQTxZWBdrMxzG6SCxAi0FgU1OsRdXsEuskUaWQN4t/zCQEZ 37tXdOK1X8zwb6UDoFaT3IEqJRhhZ2f4kR1xhO6/59Y/NeRRDvceXQlRuQady62CtwrD Vi9kQtJViZlOkEe1Dhs+h9OQixlQxel7Hc3U1Zk/C7ZHql8Z1sPM0b7F/3OMhZRxXef5 a87a4rxHnrcU1JFqAeIBgWCwzJPuH2DQDagMPz2toRcKeUAjoR7VNC/NU3IIBZrUqjoG +tDaEacNGgsx5acWCMO/pftSXy1FBZJ6NdHA8P28qpsIc107u9KIidvyK8PnvKVlqt9D J4fw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiUqU+iCjJHLQKo/SjwnEnnPFGD4hyd14MUri0qF6Rym0Voe5NY uN7rzB8LbYrxdU0sv7QvIOM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61woqRWwwoYFG03zYGKvhxCyQJHofkGq8cRlGNjRk7Qf/1jSwjLk4sUjSdlxSHvUUGbVlpw1w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8609:: with SMTP id f9-v6mr8577932plo.134.1539406518567; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 21:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-192-50.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.192.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h87-v6sm6959462pfj.78.2018.10.12.21.55.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 21:55:18 -0700 (PDT) From: frowand.list@gmail.com To: Rob Herring , Pantelis Antoniou , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer Subject: [PATCH v2 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 21:53:31 -0700 Message-Id: <1539406418-18162-12-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1539406418-18162-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> References: <1539406418-18162-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Frank Rowand Multiple overlay fragments adding or deleting the same node is not supported. An attempt to do so results in an incorrect devicetree. The node name will be munged for the second add. After adding this patch, the unittest messages will show: Duplicate name in motor-1, renamed to "controller#1" OF: overlay: of_overlay_apply() err=0 ### dt-test ### of_overlay_fdt_apply() expected -22, ret=0, overlay_bad_add_dup_node ### dt-test ### FAIL of_unittest_overlay_high_level():2419 Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed ... ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 210 passed, 1 failed The incorrect (munged) node name "controller#1" can be seen in the /proc filesystem: $ pwd /proc/device-tree/testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 $ ls compatible controller controller#1 name phandle spin $ ls controller power_bus $ ls controller#1 power_bus_emergency Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand --- drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile | 1 + .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/of/unittest.c | 5 ++++ 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile index 013d85e694c6..166dbdbfd1c5 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.dtb.o \ overlay_12.dtb.o \ overlay_13.dtb.o \ overlay_15.dtb.o \ + overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_phandle.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_symbol.dtb.o \ overlay_base.dtb.o diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..145dfc3b1024 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +/* + * &electric_1/motor-1 and &spin_ctrl_1 are the same node: + * /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 + * + * Thus the new node "controller" in each fragment will + * result in an attempt to add the same node twice. + * This will result in an error and the overlay apply + * will fail. + */ + +&electric_1 { + + motor-1 { + controller { + power_bus = < 0x1 0x2 >; + }; + }; +}; + +&spin_ctrl_1 { + controller { + power_bus_emergency = < 0x101 0x102 >; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 722537e14848..471b8eb6e842 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -2147,6 +2147,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_12); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_13); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_15); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_node); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_symbol); @@ -2169,6 +2170,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_12, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_13, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_15, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_node, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_symbol, -EINVAL), {} @@ -2413,6 +2415,9 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_node", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_phandle", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_phandle' failed\n");