From patchwork Fri Oct 5 04:12:44 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Frank Rowand X-Patchwork-Id: 979309 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42RHLn209nz9s3Z for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:48:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="n13DsC+2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42RHLn0NK8zDqsy for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:48:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="n13DsC+2"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::641; helo=mail-pl1-x641.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="n13DsC+2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x641.google.com (mail-pl1-x641.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::641]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42RGc63RzRzF3Fc for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:14:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x641.google.com with SMTP id w14-v6so6191589plp.6 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:14:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=1fnOpPM1kiapy4QHrlrobEosYyapb5Ay5UrBG0KvRxc=; b=n13DsC+2iz1vpq3/NTsv7m6uOV0oQacGkoATZot6finfcebdxUsCosCXvSEZafbLlC flSdYVPFZxkvk3vKscivI9omvZUcP9MvP5eu1RmiNjR0RVQxgtPlkk+65v2h7FgYNAg0 0srjPgRQZSZyPAnf1GsOjGZMCAcnmPB+7Y11J/JRPQLXHq4my9N1I8n8mZBd0ZzOdBn6 BOfI3U6pISrCTaA6kStSX4oSbFsCAiEgSGj01/+YlLzgGReZzmBWdcDUdgBBBy5XOqpx 754crHAMNRJZpV9WgcmIBFYrn7gh+/3c6vTGmDH6kZP1OKyw1JXu0DKkve0lPi6+1xeh 9SMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=1fnOpPM1kiapy4QHrlrobEosYyapb5Ay5UrBG0KvRxc=; b=uVVuVwpXBb5PdH4eT3piJekCwEuMKjbf7N8y11AGZuMFLBTTL3UucCTh7nZX7+vaQV 0Z22Yuzc+hGZgDtrjQoqCBSSyaFJLwP27PWGABEtGFxqsHsiAmLjjli4U4rOqe6eELjG n20RxqyCwdeVKgdyCc5oq140XReKxAbooYh7cv51gBagUBbjUVgIW/LKTPEG4BUWrodi gZ2O+sOz4oDkoTHNoLzgcl61WXuIM2urHgKvNct4kjV7XzrUl/CS0IvYmg/1TXo6urCY lD0dsFSd9nmL8K4nHn4nf9CqB3baE8AfKv2bA83N544hrNYzh07lTSxQc4fze7EYCv1S HJVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohuyjwHbzOGXuqjOEybAq+iJeqGoL2K1zqsdYBbU3jhtpGiHic7 G7hzXlwcDK8BhYxKT97NBMM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63SLRwAN3ru9qVoH9krxSJ9C2yaGSpf65+8GpK+SAd/BsbEllXRqofVjyqZdzPFOHrsqtmgIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:158b:: with SMTP id m11-v6mr9565869pla.102.1538712868355; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-192-50.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.192.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n63-v6sm277975pfn.9.2018.10.04.21.14.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:14:27 -0700 (PDT) From: frowand.list@gmail.com To: Rob Herring , Pantelis Antoniou , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer Subject: [PATCH 13/16] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:12:44 -0700 Message-Id: <1538712767-30394-14-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1538712767-30394-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> References: <1538712767-30394-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Frank Rowand Add test case of two fragments updating the same property. After adding the test case, the system hangs at end of boot, after after slub stack dumps from kfree() in crypto modprobe code. Multiple overlay fragments adding, modifying, or deleting the same property is not supported. Add check to detect the attempt and fail the overlay apply. After applying this patch, the devicetree unittest messages will include: OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail ... ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 212 passed, 0 failed The check to detect two fragments updating the same property is folded into the patch that created the test case to maintain bisectability. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand --- drivers/of/overlay.c | 118 ++++++++++++++------- drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile | 1 + .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts | 24 +++++ drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts | 1 + drivers/of/unittest.c | 5 + 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c index 5376ae166caf..640435534675 100644 --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c @@ -514,52 +514,96 @@ static int build_changeset_symbols_node(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs, return 0; } +static int find_dup_cset_node_entry(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs, + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1) +{ + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_2; + char *fn_1, *fn_2; + int node_path_match; + + if (ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE && + ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) + return 0; + + ce_2 = ce_1; + list_for_each_entry_continue(ce_2, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { + if ((ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE || + ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) && + !of_node_cmp(ce_1->np->full_name, ce_2->np->full_name)) { + + fn_1 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_1->np); + fn_2 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_2->np); + node_path_match = !strcmp(fn_1, fn_2); + kfree(fn_1); + kfree(fn_2); + if (node_path_match) { + pr_err("ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add and/or delete node %pOF\n", + ce_1->np); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static int find_dup_cset_prop(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs, + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1) +{ + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_2; + char *fn_1, *fn_2; + int node_path_match; + + if (ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_ADD_PROPERTY && + ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_REMOVE_PROPERTY && + ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY) + return 0; + + ce_2 = ce_1; + list_for_each_entry_continue(ce_2, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { + if ((ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_ADD_PROPERTY || + ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_REMOVE_PROPERTY || + ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY) && + !of_node_cmp(ce_1->np->full_name, ce_2->np->full_name)) { + + fn_1 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_1->np); + fn_2 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_2->np); + node_path_match = !strcmp(fn_1, fn_2); + kfree(fn_1); + kfree(fn_2); + if (node_path_match && + !of_prop_cmp(ce_1->prop->name, ce_2->prop->name)) { + pr_err("ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add, update, and/or delete property %pOF/%s\n", + ce_1->np, ce_1->prop->name); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + } + + return 0; +} + /** - * check_changeset_dup_add_node() - changeset validation: duplicate add node + * changeset_dup_entry_check() - check for duplicate entries * @ovcs: Overlay changeset * - * Check changeset @ovcs->cset for multiple add node entries for the same - * node. + * Check changeset @ovcs->cset for multiple {add or delete} node entries for + * the same node or duplicate {add, delete, or update} properties entries + * for the same property. * - * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM if memory allocation failure, or -EINVAL if - * invalid overlay in @ovcs->fragments[]. + * Returns 0 on success, or -EINVAL if duplicate changeset entry found. */ -static int check_changeset_dup_add_node(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs) +static int changeset_dup_entry_check(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs) { - struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1, *ce_2; - char *fn_1, *fn_2; - int name_match; + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1; + int dup_entry = 0; list_for_each_entry(ce_1, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { - - if (ce_1->action == OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE || - ce_1->action == OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) { - - ce_2 = ce_1; - list_for_each_entry_continue(ce_2, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { - if (ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE || - ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) { - /* inexpensive name compare */ - if (!of_node_cmp(ce_1->np->full_name, - ce_2->np->full_name)) { - /* expensive full path name compare */ - fn_1 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_1->np); - fn_2 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_2->np); - name_match = !strcmp(fn_1, fn_2); - kfree(fn_1); - kfree(fn_2); - if (name_match) { - pr_err("ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add and/or delete node %pOF\n", - ce_1->np); - return -EINVAL; - } - } - } - } - } + dup_entry |= find_dup_cset_node_entry(ovcs, ce_1); + dup_entry |= find_dup_cset_prop(ovcs, ce_1); } - return 0; + return dup_entry ? -EINVAL : 0; } /** @@ -617,7 +661,7 @@ static int build_changeset(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs) } } - return check_changeset_dup_add_node(ovcs); + return changeset_dup_entry_check(ovcs); } /* diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile index 166dbdbfd1c5..9b6807065827 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.dtb.o \ overlay_13.dtb.o \ overlay_15.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dtb.o \ + overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_phandle.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_symbol.dtb.o \ overlay_base.dtb.o diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c190da54f175 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +/* + * &electric_1/motor-1 and &spin_ctrl_1 are the same node: + * /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 + * + * Thus the property "rpm_avail" in each fragment will + * result in an attempt to update the same property twice. + * This will result in an error and the overlay apply + * will fail. + */ + +&electric_1 { + + motor-1 { + rpm_avail = < 100 >; + }; +}; + +&spin_ctrl_1 { + rpm_avail = < 100 200 >; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts index 820b79ca378a..99ab9d12d00b 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ spin_ctrl_1: motor-1 { compatible = "ot,ferris-wheel-motor"; spin = "clockwise"; + rpm_avail = < 50 >; }; spin_ctrl_2: motor-8 { diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 471b8eb6e842..efd9c947f192 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_13); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_15); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_node); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_symbol); @@ -2171,6 +2172,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_13, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_15, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_node, -EINVAL), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_symbol, -EINVAL), {} @@ -2418,6 +2420,9 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_node", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_prop", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_prop' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_phandle", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_phandle' failed\n");