From patchwork Thu May 17 11:06:31 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Laurent Dufour X-Patchwork-Id: 915373 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40mqbV04sWz9s0q for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:59:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40mqbT5hPFzF1mb for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:59:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40mpS60rWYzF1gW for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:07:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4HB4D9v022961 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 07:07:47 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j187ph2sf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 07:07:47 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 17 May 2018 12:07:41 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 17 May 2018 12:07:31 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4HB7Vn959310160; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:07:31 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05264C050; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:59:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D044C04E; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:59:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.101.4.33]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:59:18 +0100 (BST) From: Laurent Dufour To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, Daniel Jordan , David Rientjes , Jerome Glisse , Ganesh Mahendran , Minchan Kim , Punit Agrawal , vinayak menon , Yang Shi Subject: [PATCH v11 24/26] x86/mm: add speculative pagefault handling Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 13:06:31 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1526555193-7242-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1526555193-7242-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18051711-0044-0000-0000-000005537523 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18051711-0045-0000-0000-00002894E904 Message-Id: <1526555193-7242-25-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-17_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805170100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen , haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Peter Zijlstra Try a speculative fault before acquiring mmap_sem, if it returns with VM_FAULT_RETRY continue with the mmap_sem acquisition and do the traditional fault. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [Clearing of FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is now done in handle_speculative_fault()] [Retry with usual fault path in the case VM_ERROR is returned by handle_speculative_fault(). This allows signal to be delivered] [Don't build SPF call if !CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT] [Handle memory protection key fault] Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index fd84edf82252..11944bfc805a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, struct mm_struct *mm; int fault, major = 0; unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE; - u32 pkey; + u32 pkey, *pt_pkey = &pkey; tsk = current; mm = tsk->mm; @@ -1314,6 +1314,27 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION; /* + * Do not try to do a speculative page fault if the fault was due to + * protection keys since it can't be resolved. + */ + if (!(error_code & X86_PF_PK)) { + fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address, flags); + if (fault != VM_FAULT_RETRY) { + perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF, 1, regs, address); + /* + * Do not advertise for the pkey value since we don't + * know it. + * This is not a matter as we checked for X86_PF_PK + * earlier, so we should not handle pkey fault here, + * but to be sure that mm_fault_error() callees will + * not try to use it, we invalidate the pointer. + */ + pt_pkey = NULL; + goto done; + } + } + + /* * When running in the kernel we expect faults to occur only to * addresses in user space. All other faults represent errors in * the kernel and should generate an OOPS. Unfortunately, in the @@ -1427,8 +1448,10 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, } up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); + +done: if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) { - mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, &pkey, fault); + mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, pt_pkey, fault); return; }