From patchwork Thu Sep 26 06:46:18 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Qi Zheng X-Patchwork-Id: 1989634 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=TCmBHdQv; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev+bounces-1609-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XDkg60Mlpz1xt6 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:47:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XDkg53GmCz2yR9; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:47:29 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="2607:f8b0:4864:20::829" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1727333249; cv=none; b=Vv3ZDf07LTtDthQqMGEXpkcfOANfo154FilkTAyDlXDlta6zhejGtv7RqYiAMEFca071nVkTM2ZNq+7JE+aadavbnzlRcBoMMqPVdBo5xFEgCe8mEcFsd751pTdiA+jwBSAlNcqQTPcI8IRLwAf0WnbN7p65HoRNIYLGdAOP065mbIYxFl+SQCce9ACU2RBUk90cqqTwUvMouANnnPf+0G3BF/2ME1gXt137qG1zuWjwPkVDLWtQM03Y9pmCLZbBcgIDjRHZDVl32hKaQh3MyX1mjArl0QfLsYFdVS/YHFytRQ8Cds8WVmdhX8B9E7IplP32sXA10qdvZLGeBwK7Pw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1727333249; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=VXy51M36oXFNN3kWVEF6T1v76BlvE2cEswNH4MTPbjU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=hSl6Ug0VLar0+W3uwNMGmDw4DNpxTOP4fSTqX+WCESup+hIHyyMQUo626GZR0dFpwydm+TAgYdsBuLDD3YNRYoi7O58l9iTPOG8U4ZOc7S0oueNb/KIkhAGOG0/9kmVFR9Qo/mn7NjkfdyizejleuKNE1SUgGV0ZOvG2mSKtWCt8+mJZXgdgu8pMzI7aBh4DYqbMTbM/5lTkZW7lKTE4GosTqJBvR6VSSuO7UhBSSNRI/z1WUJLWk1X8qftgA6PI+MZ1aKl+MtH8u4WIh1TUFnNWaCVMSeJ9FjeECLGC6xdlg+du0TUSigwLM6WA0hRCSK2o/kCvWpS9Kqpc1EG2aQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=TCmBHdQv; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::829; helo=mail-qt1-x829.google.com; envelope-from=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=TCmBHdQv; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::829; helo=mail-qt1-x829.google.com; envelope-from=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XDkg51JCwz2xF0 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:47:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-458362e898aso4395541cf.0 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:47:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance.com; s=google; t=1727333246; x=1727938046; darn=lists.ozlabs.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=VXy51M36oXFNN3kWVEF6T1v76BlvE2cEswNH4MTPbjU=; b=TCmBHdQvdGjhxnXYaryLaJ314VZGjyp++WMHxvAnrRzC0QdqkIwNh3MB8MIaadXrBG FAfnrB4UwPXOYcQtNm25hIJLiydPTEe/ADAhO+zjNMwkc2EDI3ar2cBfS7KW9F07g34x xA6/4jZK5+J3lLgmryXmwnRU8WqWdySWWgiP2RzsvpgHmKH4c7BchgB6meh58ZGELUE3 sku2U6KkaKi2SYABY8zIPZpQRzZeNqjDFd2qWQxcqnW90fMtbF8LR39yM74FZ5fbEH1M x40a07iUI33b4iMEOwWa6dB9/lzgXdGvRTTlGJha8VPrquNXfT4sg4tDsNbXmzT7H47w jDjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727333246; x=1727938046; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VXy51M36oXFNN3kWVEF6T1v76BlvE2cEswNH4MTPbjU=; b=eq8VpuNS/QDC8CO+A8ga/JuAaO3iCT/fgdi7WXT/m0ha54AIVVj96h9X3n0r6hQ4EX dT3MbyabckFccFEo6Pqo6yyrWEN5yIMKEMwY+QpiJ9lyke3/iWc8XnPRe28SR3Y2Wk4+ o4yBz6KadYuHMthxCiups6fCdw6SwZzb4TDnpu9Gm4JE+tehUOifpu924WALsKXF48Ib U27BrxXKiq+EKp3Ej4OBzjKGyJZCg0Sn78Su0he0npWwwvYM7Be1BtcsmkQlimN26tHr OSw0+OqWaRV1aMSPAn8xNcPeAxXoTT0fDK2Yfn5LsDm1C8HKPOjTAx+/JidzIfOV9zCL BJag== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWM2t1gXBqbN96Tn6IvVvI26bF4liIjeJyHgtwLlNQXyxqZqAUuOSTinekWVQRfvspu2Jb8vXWCPFlaIWs=@lists.ozlabs.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YznyfF+W51sW7tKviVidfSM0VeSBbWgeu4WmKE+uRKJV6nwYOFz zq+cRuQBJh7LHjXryPeImZvD+CuFC6qHob1019vq8/H5oOIPgWZxIVDEj3xjWM4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGInGARMP6O0lOtN8I02J26ctBRW9WAU/Ifxw0RvFOYg2EOnEie2juwEDAOYLUuf+d4v6O7qQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5885:0:b0:456:94fe:dcdf with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-45b5def4674mr66807991cf.35.1727333246109; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from C02DW0BEMD6R.bytedance.net ([203.208.167.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-45b5257ff1esm23024611cf.38.2024.09.25.23.47.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:47:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Qi Zheng To: david@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, vbabka@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, vishal.moola@gmail.com, peterx@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Qi Zheng Subject: [PATCH v5 05/13] arm: adjust_pte() use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock() Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:46:18 +0800 Message-Id: <0eaf6b69aeb2fe35092a633fed12537efe645303.1727332572.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In do_adjust_pte(), we may modify the pte entry. The corresponding pmd entry may have been modified concurrently. Therefore, in order to ensure the stability if pmd entry, use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock() to replace pte_offset_map_nolock(), and do pmd_same() check after holding the PTL. All callers of update_mmu_cache_range() hold the vmf->ptl, so we can determined whether split PTE locks is being used by doing the following, just as we do elsewhere in the kernel. ptl != vmf->ptl And then we can delete the do_pte_lock() and do_pte_unlock(). Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Muchun Song --- arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c index 831793cd6ff94..2bec87c3327d2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c @@ -61,32 +61,8 @@ static int do_adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, return ret; } -#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) -/* - * If we are using split PTE locks, then we need to take the page - * lock here. Otherwise we are using shared mm->page_table_lock - * which is already locked, thus cannot take it. - */ -static inline void do_pte_lock(spinlock_t *ptl) -{ - /* - * Use nested version here to indicate that we are already - * holding one similar spinlock. - */ - spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); -} - -static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl) -{ - spin_unlock(ptl); -} -#else /* !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */ -static inline void do_pte_lock(spinlock_t *ptl) {} -static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl) {} -#endif /* defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */ - static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, - unsigned long pfn) + unsigned long pfn, struct vm_fault *vmf) { spinlock_t *ptl; pgd_t *pgd; @@ -94,6 +70,7 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pud_t *pud; pmd_t *pmd; pte_t *pte; + pmd_t pmdval; int ret; pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, address); @@ -112,20 +89,33 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) return 0; +again: /* * This is called while another page table is mapped, so we * must use the nested version. This also means we need to * open-code the spin-locking. */ - pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, address, &ptl); + pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, address, &pmdval, &ptl); if (!pte) return 0; - do_pte_lock(ptl); + /* + * If we are using split PTE locks, then we need to take the page + * lock here. Otherwise we are using shared mm->page_table_lock + * which is already locked, thus cannot take it. + */ + if (ptl != vmf->ptl) { + spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmdval, pmdp_get_lockless(pmd)))) { + pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); + goto again; + } + } ret = do_adjust_pte(vma, address, pfn, pte); - do_pte_unlock(ptl); + if (ptl != vmf->ptl) + spin_unlock(ptl); pte_unmap(pte); return ret; @@ -133,7 +123,8 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, static void make_coherent(struct address_space *mapping, struct vm_area_struct *vma, - unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long pfn) + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long pfn, + struct vm_fault *vmf) { struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; struct vm_area_struct *mpnt; @@ -160,7 +151,7 @@ make_coherent(struct address_space *mapping, struct vm_area_struct *vma, if (!(mpnt->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)) continue; offset = (pgoff - mpnt->vm_pgoff) << PAGE_SHIFT; - aliases += adjust_pte(mpnt, mpnt->vm_start + offset, pfn); + aliases += adjust_pte(mpnt, mpnt->vm_start + offset, pfn, vmf); } flush_dcache_mmap_unlock(mapping); if (aliases) @@ -203,7 +194,7 @@ void update_mmu_cache_range(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct vm_area_struct *vma, __flush_dcache_folio(mapping, folio); if (mapping) { if (cache_is_vivt()) - make_coherent(mapping, vma, addr, ptep, pfn); + make_coherent(mapping, vma, addr, ptep, pfn, vmf); else if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC) __flush_icache_all(); }