From patchwork Tue Jul 23 03:44:13 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sam Bobroff X-Patchwork-Id: 1136010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45tgjj49klz9s3l for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:26:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45tgjj1RzpzDqLT for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:26:17 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45t49C3ZnMzDqSS for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:44:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6N3gmpq058668 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:44:28 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2twsr6sffu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:44:28 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:44:25 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:44:22 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x6N3iMOl39321780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:44:22 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0817A4040; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:44:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E119A404D; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:44:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:44:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tungsten.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63492A0286; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:44:20 +1000 (AEST) From: Sam Bobroff To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] powerpc/eeh: Clear stale EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER flag Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:44:13 +1000 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0.216.g00a2a96fc9 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19072303-0020-0000-0000-000003564B27 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19072303-0021-0000-0000-000021AA337D Message-Id: <014fe615d70ace9747d0d178807d15653f257470.1563853440.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-23_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=759 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907230030 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, oohall@gmail.com, tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER flag is used by the EEH system to prevent the use of driver callbacks in drivers that have been bound part way through the recovery process. This is necessary to prevent later stage handlers from being called when the earlier stage handlers haven't, which can be confusing for drivers. However, the flag is set for all devices that are added after boot time and only cleared at the end of the EEH recovery process. This results in hot plugged devices erroneously having the flag set during the first recovery after they are added (causing their driver's handlers to be incorrectly ignored). To remedy this, clear the flag at the beginning of recovery processing. The flag is still cleared at the end of recovery processing, although it is no longer really necessary. Also clear the flag during eeh_handle_special_event(), for the same reasons. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff --- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c index 6f3ee30565dd..d6f54840a3a9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c @@ -819,6 +819,10 @@ void eeh_handle_normal_event(struct eeh_pe *pe) result = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT; } + eeh_for_each_pe(pe, tmp_pe) + eeh_pe_for_each_dev(tmp_pe, edev, tmp) + edev->mode &= ~EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER; + /* Walk the various device drivers attached to this slot through * a reset sequence, giving each an opportunity to do what it needs * to accomplish the reset. Each child gets a report of the @@ -1009,7 +1013,8 @@ void eeh_handle_normal_event(struct eeh_pe *pe) */ void eeh_handle_special_event(void) { - struct eeh_pe *pe, *phb_pe; + struct eeh_pe *pe, *phb_pe, *tmp_pe; + struct eeh_dev *edev, *tmp_edev; struct pci_bus *bus; struct pci_controller *hose; unsigned long flags; @@ -1078,6 +1083,10 @@ void eeh_handle_special_event(void) (phb_pe->state & EEH_PE_RECOVERING)) continue; + eeh_for_each_pe(pe, tmp_pe) + eeh_pe_for_each_dev(tmp_pe, edev, tmp_edev) + edev->mode &= ~EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER; + /* Notify all devices to be down */ eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_PRI_BUS, true); eeh_set_channel_state(pe, pci_channel_io_perm_failure);