From patchwork Mon Mar 18 14:21:32 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baoquan He X-Patchwork-Id: 1913128 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NhwipeGv; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NhwipeGv; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TyxrS6p50z1yWy for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:22:16 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NhwipeGv; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NhwipeGv; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TyxrP66H2z3cy9 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:22:13 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NhwipeGv; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NhwipeGv; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=bhe@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tyxr54mmQz307y for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:21:56 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710771713; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F5ye388VWoErT8xKd/JXdRVRXGFtTvAxoGWVnY3cKSY=; b=NhwipeGvrm54kiBMjob5kJxMv5bDvidUCd6ySMnKjB0BZagGY7ni2d5J06ypc4A672hju1 eQ/VaWwRIdfTtoW0mgJfQf1n7x2YL9/nVb3luyfI4crQsV19H31dzkqwSJSPJoOLOvpfcB vYPlMOiaXaLb4LL7pAk6MU+6h7SN7xc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710771713; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F5ye388VWoErT8xKd/JXdRVRXGFtTvAxoGWVnY3cKSY=; b=NhwipeGvrm54kiBMjob5kJxMv5bDvidUCd6ySMnKjB0BZagGY7ni2d5J06ypc4A672hju1 eQ/VaWwRIdfTtoW0mgJfQf1n7x2YL9/nVb3luyfI4crQsV19H31dzkqwSJSPJoOLOvpfcB vYPlMOiaXaLb4LL7pAk6MU+6h7SN7xc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-505-wJFmYP1ANHGgSGjgt3Fcnw-1; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:21:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wJFmYP1ANHGgSGjgt3Fcnw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C8F3C0F180; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MiWiFi-R3L-srv.redhat.com (unknown [10.72.116.12]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88FE492BD0; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:21:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Baoquan He To: linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH 0/6] mm/mm_init.c: refactor free_area_init_core() Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:21:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20240318142138.783350-1-bhe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Baoquan He , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, rppt@kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In function free_area_init_core(), the code calculating zone->managed_pages and the subtracting dma_reserve from DMA zone looks very confusing. From git history, the code calculating zone->managed_pages was for zone->present_pages originally. The early rough assignment is for optimize zone's pcp and water mark setting. Later, managed_pages was introduced into zone to represent the number of managed pages by buddy. Now, zone->managed_pages is zeroed out and reset in mem_init() when calling memblock_free_all(). zone's pcp and wmark setting relying on actual zone->managed_pages are done later than mem_init() invocation. So we don't need rush to early calculate and set zone->managed_pages, just set it as zone->present_pages, will adjust it in mem_init(). And also add a new function calc_nr_kernel_pages() to count up free but not reserved pages in memblock, then assign it to nr_all_pages and nr_kernel_pages after memmap pages are allocated. Baoquan He (6): mm/mm_init.c: remove the useless dma_reserve x86: remove unneeded memblock_find_dma_reserve() mm/mm_init.c: add new function calc_nr_all_pages() mm/mm_init.c: remove meaningless calculation of zone->managed_pages in free_area_init_core() mm/mm_init.c: remove unneeded calc_memmap_size() mm/mm_init.c: remove arch_reserved_kernel_pages() arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h | 4 -- arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 5 -- arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 - arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 - arch/x86/mm/init.c | 47 ------------- include/linux/mm.h | 4 -- mm/mm_init.c | 117 +++++++++------------------------ 7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)