mbox series

[v3,devicetree,0/2] Add Seville Ethernet switch to T1040RDB

Message ID 20201001132013.1866299-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Add Seville Ethernet switch to T1040RDB | expand

Message

Vladimir Oltean Oct. 1, 2020, 1:20 p.m. UTC
Seville is a DSA switch that is embedded inside the T1040 SoC, and
supported by the mscc_seville DSA driver inside drivers/net/dsa/ocelot.

This series adds this switch to the SoC's dtsi files and to the T1040RDB
board file.

Vladimir Oltean (2):
  powerpc: dts: t1040: add bindings for Seville Ethernet switch
  powerpc: dts: t1040rdb: add ports for Seville Ethernet switch

 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040rdb.dts      | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040si-post.dtsi |  78 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 185 insertions(+)

Comments

David Miller Oct. 1, 2020, 8:10 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Thu,  1 Oct 2020 16:20:11 +0300

> Seville is a DSA switch that is embedded inside the T1040 SoC, and
> supported by the mscc_seville DSA driver inside drivers/net/dsa/ocelot.
> 
> This series adds this switch to the SoC's dtsi files and to the T1040RDB
> board file.

I am assuming the devicetree folks will pick this series up.

Thanks.
Vladimir Oltean Oct. 2, 2020, 12:50 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 01:10:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> Date: Thu,  1 Oct 2020 16:20:11 +0300
> 
> > Seville is a DSA switch that is embedded inside the T1040 SoC, and
> > supported by the mscc_seville DSA driver inside drivers/net/dsa/ocelot.
> > 
> > This series adds this switch to the SoC's dtsi files and to the T1040RDB
> > board file.
> 
> I am assuming the devicetree folks will pick this series up.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

I can also resend via net-next if that's easier (the last commit on
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t104*, as per today's linux-next, has been in
2018, so there is no conflict).

I need to resend anyway, due to an epic failure where I got the port
numbering wrong...