Message ID | 20241128081939.2216246-2-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=cC/ckkvW; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=antgroup.com header.i=@antgroup.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=DDIIHKLl; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:3::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XzTlg2pzkz1y01 for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:20:47 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=btI1okv/tr01jFsz6smIK4ol80YedP8ZiMg8DfX3xn4=; b=cC/ckkvWPyNhLfeZUU5Lc/nx75 4hHY67ed9BAZfOqLvulb0U0aRcrgqKbUV4IXvR1aECdsE0I5Umv6qhn1y2eJY3xFP1VlG0if2Sh5x M+wFm8EVsbBACN4bEmdqLqgHuMv0Sa5wSYSrHufzVOhiP5reAVihsdZkav8qXDnp3EDkIMOnIpfl2 zrURBuE/SdvkaIcrPB8LZdFPEyzdRrdMsKBV18rLXo69m92OMkeJ2mJrLz2+KHIKw/wYna91sKV/G mR3v1Uru/MiEZ+GbPhJKrCaAMbOPrHdFfxKYrfUjke/B1fVDdzESYbXMHq+9BOAnofJNbtEGS0crP QiLGQa0w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tGZlV-0000000EyXK-42gF; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:20:45 +0000 Received: from out0-209.mail.aliyun.com ([140.205.0.209]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tGZkg-0000000EyIG-0vpI for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:19:56 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antgroup.com; s=default; t=1732781989; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=btI1okv/tr01jFsz6smIK4ol80YedP8ZiMg8DfX3xn4=; b=DDIIHKLlFlVPi9LOmTeK0q7awOMYr7cp3G2+oac1v19xtygHfxsw6ekMOI8NnocykYYhX7SG/R/oHSHK9woFWZihjGoB78/Yxt0itgAT5HtwBFDHdDpd4H5ef7GmusWguL8lPtOFkviPGECDb+FboAszUs5kOH+zB7c2nN9ZtIY= Received: from ubuntu..(mailfrom:tiwei.btw@antgroup.com fp:SMTPD_---.aP-8fnC_1732781987 cluster:ay29) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:19:48 +0800 From: "Tiwei Bie" <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> To: richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>, "Tiwei Bie" <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] um: Remove unused MODULES_LEN macro Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:19:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20241128081939.2216246-2-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241128081939.2216246-1-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> References: <20241128081939.2216246-1-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241128_001954_543868_DE153F6F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.44 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It's not used anywhere. And its definition doesn't seem right. Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> --- arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h index 12bfc58a8580..79ff979520bb 100644 --- a/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -52,7 +52, [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [140.205.0.209 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [140.205.0.209 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [140.205.0.209 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [140.205.0.209 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-um.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-um>, <mailto:linux-um-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-um/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-um@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-um-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um>, <mailto:linux-um-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: "linux-um" <linux-um-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
um: Some mem cleanups
|
expand
|
diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h index 12bfc58a8580..79ff979520bb 100644 --- a/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ extern unsigned long end_iomem; #define VMALLOC_END (FIXADDR_START-2*PAGE_SIZE) #define MODULES_VADDR VMALLOC_START #define MODULES_END VMALLOC_END -#define MODULES_LEN (MODULES_VADDR - MODULES_END) #define _PAGE_TABLE (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_USER | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY) #define _KERNPG_TABLE (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
It's not used anywhere. And its definition doesn't seem right. Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com> --- arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)