@@ -828,6 +828,86 @@ static int rename_volumes(struct ubi_device *ubi,
return err;
}
+
+static int ubi_get_ec_info(struct ubi_device *ubi, void __user *argp)
+{
+ struct ubi_ecinfo_req *req;
+ struct ubi_wl_entry *wl;
+ int peb;
+ int end_peb;
+ int i;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ req = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ubi_ecinfo_req), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!req)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* Copy just the input arguments */
+ err = copy_from_user(req, argp, sizeof(struct ubi_ecinfo_req) -
+ offsetof(struct ubi_ecinfo_req, end_ec_res));
+ if (err) {
+ err = -EFAULT;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+
+ /* Make sure that start value is less or equal to end value */
+ if (req->start_ec_req > req->end_ec_req) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+
+ /* Check input argument start value */
+ if ((req->start_ec_req < 0 || req->start_ec_req >= ubi->peb_count)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+
+ /* Check if end value is less than 0 */
+ if (req->end_ec_req < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+
+ end_peb = req->end_ec_req;
+
+ /* Control end value */
+ if (end_peb > ubi->peb_count)
+ end_peb = ubi->peb_count;
+
+ /* Check that we do not overwrite our working memory */
+ if (end_peb > (ARRAY_SIZE(req->erase_counters) + req->start_ec_req))
+ end_peb = ARRAY_SIZE(req->erase_counters) + req->start_ec_req;
+
+ i = 0;
+ for (peb = req->start_ec_req; peb < end_peb; i++, peb++) {
+
+ if (ubi_io_is_bad(ubi, peb)) {
+ req->erase_counters[i] = UBI_UNKNOWN;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
+
+ wl = ubi->lookuptbl[peb];
+ if (wl)
+ req->erase_counters[i] = wl->ec;
+ else
+ req->erase_counters[i] = UBI_UNKNOWN;
+
+ spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
+ }
+
+ /* Return last read peb */
+ req->end_ec_res = end_peb - 1;
+
+ if (copy_to_user(argp, req, sizeof(struct ubi_ecinfo_req)))
+ err = -EFAULT;
+
+out_free:
+ kfree(req);
+ return err;
+}
+
static long ubi_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
@@ -991,6 +1071,12 @@ static long ubi_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
break;
}
+ case UBI_IOCECNFO:
+ {
+ err = ubi_get_ec_info(ubi, argp);
+ break;
+ }
+
default:
err = -ENOTTY;
break;
Currently, only "max_ec" can be read from sysfs, which provides a limited view of the flash device’s wear. In certain cases, such as bugs in the wear-leveling algorithm, specific blocks can be worn down more than others, resulting in uneven wear distribution. Providing detailed erase counter values give a better understanding of the overall flash wear. There exists more detailed info in debugfs, but this information is only available for debug builds. Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@axis.com> --- drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)