diff mbox series

[v2] ARC: bpf: Correct conditional check in 'check_jmp_32'

Message ID 20241113134142.14970-1-hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io
State New
Headers show
Series [v2] ARC: bpf: Correct conditional check in 'check_jmp_32' | expand

Commit Message

Hardevsinh Palaniya Nov. 13, 2024, 1:41 p.m. UTC
The original code checks 'if (ARC_CC_AL)', which is always true since
ARC_CC_AL is a constant. This makes the check redundant and likely
obscures the intention of verifying whether the jump is conditional.

Updates the code to check cond == ARC_CC_AL instead, reflecting the intent
to differentiate conditional from unconditional jumps.

Suggested-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io>
---

Changelog in V2:

- Changed subject line
- Updated condition check to 'if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)' instead of removing it

Link for v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e6d27adb-151c-46c1-9668-1cd2b492321b@linux.dev/T/#t
---
 arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Vadim Fedorenko Nov. 13, 2024, 2:06 p.m. UTC | #1
On 13/11/2024 13:41, Hardevsinh Palaniya wrote:
> The original code checks 'if (ARC_CC_AL)', which is always true since
> ARC_CC_AL is a constant. This makes the check redundant and likely
> obscures the intention of verifying whether the jump is conditional.
> 
> Updates the code to check cond == ARC_CC_AL instead, reflecting the intent
> to differentiate conditional from unconditional jumps.
> 
> Suggested-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io>
> ---
> 
> Changelog in V2:
> 
> - Changed subject line
> - Updated condition check to 'if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)' instead of removing it
> 
> Link for v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e6d27adb-151c-46c1-9668-1cd2b492321b@linux.dev/T/#t
> ---

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Shahab Vahedi Nov. 13, 2024, 8 p.m. UTC | #2
> The original code checks 'if (ARC_CC_AL)', which is always true since
> ARC_CC_AL is a constant. This makes the check redundant and likely
> obscures the intention of verifying whether the jump is conditional.
>
> Updates the code to check cond == ARC_CC_AL instead, reflecting the intent
> to differentiate conditional from unconditional jumps.
>
> Suggested-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io>
> ---
>
> Changelog in V2:
>
> - Changed subject line
> - Updated condition check to 'if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)' instead of removing it
>
> Link for v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e6d27adb-151c-46c1-9668-1cd2b492321b@linux.dev/T/#t
> ---
> arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
> index 4458e409ca0a..6d989b6d88c6 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
> @@ -2916,7 +2916,7 @@ bool check_jmp_32(u32 curr_off, u32 targ_off, u8 cond)
>     addendum = (cond == ARC_CC_AL) ? 0 : INSN_len_normal;
>     disp = get_displacement(curr_off + addendum, targ_off);
>
> -   if (ARC_CC_AL)
> +   if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)
>         return is_valid_far_disp(disp);
>     else
>         return is_valid_near_disp(disp);
> --
> 2.43.0

Thank you for your contribution!

Acked-by: Shahab Vahedi <list+bpf@vahedi.org>
Shahab Vahedi Nov. 15, 2024, 3:55 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Vineet,

Could you pick up this patch [1] in your "next"?

Thanks,
Shahab

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/920e71ab-2375-4722-bcf3-d6aaf8e68b3a@vahedi.org/T/#t
Vineet Gupta Nov. 16, 2024, 12:32 a.m. UTC | #4
On 11/15/24 07:55, Shahab Vahedi wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> Could you pick up this patch [1] in your "next"?
>
> Thanks,
> Shahab
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/920e71ab-2375-4722-bcf3-d6aaf8e68b3a@vahedi.org/T/#t

Done. Given We are in the last week this all will land in 6.13 cycle.

-Vineet
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
index 4458e409ca0a..6d989b6d88c6 100644
--- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
+++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
@@ -2916,7 +2916,7 @@  bool check_jmp_32(u32 curr_off, u32 targ_off, u8 cond)
 	addendum = (cond == ARC_CC_AL) ? 0 : INSN_len_normal;
 	disp = get_displacement(curr_off + addendum, targ_off);
 
-	if (ARC_CC_AL)
+	if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)
 		return is_valid_far_disp(disp);
 	else
 		return is_valid_near_disp(disp);