Message ID | 66ecba4c.a70a0220.34a92e.63ed@mx.google.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] c++: Don't strip USING_DECLs when updating local bindings [PR116748] | expand |
On 9/19/24 7:56 PM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > Noticed how to fix this while working on the other patch. > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? OK. > -- >8 -- > > This implements part of P1787 to no longer complain about redeclaring an > entity via using-decl other than in a class scope. > > PR c++/116160 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * name-lookup.cc (supplement_binding): Allow redeclaration via > USING_DECL if not in class scope. > (do_nonmember_using_decl): Remove function-scope exemption. > (push_using_decl_bindings): Remove outdated comment. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C: No longer expect an error. > * g++.dg/lookup/using53.C: Remove XFAIL. > * g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C: New test. > > Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com> > --- > gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc | 12 +++++++----- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C | 2 +- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C | 9 +++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc > index 94b031e6be2..22a1c6aac8c 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc > @@ -2874,6 +2874,12 @@ supplement_binding (cxx_binding *binding, tree decl) > "%<-std=c++2c%> or %<-std=gnu++2c%>"); > binding->value = name_lookup::ambiguous (decl, binding->value); > } > + else if (binding->scope->kind != sk_class > + && TREE_CODE (decl) == USING_DECL > + && decls_match (target_bval, target_decl)) > + /* Since P1787 (DR 36) it is OK to redeclare entities via using-decl, > + except in class scopes. */ > + ok = false; > else > { > if (!error_operand_p (bval)) > @@ -5375,8 +5381,7 @@ do_nonmember_using_decl (name_lookup &lookup, bool fn_scope_p, > else if (value > /* Ignore anticipated builtins. */ > && !anticipated_builtin_p (value) > - && (fn_scope_p > - || !decls_match (lookup.value, strip_using_decl (value)))) > + && !decls_match (lookup.value, strip_using_decl (value))) > { > diagnose_name_conflict (lookup.value, value); > failed = true; > @@ -6648,9 +6653,6 @@ push_using_decl_bindings (name_lookup *lookup, tree name, tree value) > type = binding->type; > } > > - /* DR 36 questions why using-decls at function scope may not be > - duplicates. Disallow it, as C++11 claimed and PR 20420 > - implemented. */ > if (lookup) > do_nonmember_using_decl (*lookup, true, true, &value, &type); > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C > index 34f8bf4fa0b..4638181c63c 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > void f () > { > enum e { a }; > - using e::a; // { dg-error "redeclaration" } > + using e::a; // { dg-bogus "redeclaration" "P1787" } > // { dg-error "enum" "" { target { ! c++2a } } .-1 } > } > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..ff99ed422d5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ > +// PR c++/116160 > +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } > + > +enum class Blah { b }; > +void foo() { > + using Blah::b; > + using Blah::b; > + using enum Blah; > +} > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C > index e91829e939a..8279c73bfc4 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C > @@ -52,5 +52,5 @@ void > f () > { > using N::i; > - using N::i; // { dg-bogus "conflicts" "See P1787 (CWG36)" { xfail *-*-* } } > + using N::i; // { dg-bogus "conflicts" "See P1787 (CWG36)" } > }
diff --git a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc index 94b031e6be2..22a1c6aac8c 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc @@ -2874,6 +2874,12 @@ supplement_binding (cxx_binding *binding, tree decl) "%<-std=c++2c%> or %<-std=gnu++2c%>"); binding->value = name_lookup::ambiguous (decl, binding->value); } + else if (binding->scope->kind != sk_class + && TREE_CODE (decl) == USING_DECL + && decls_match (target_bval, target_decl)) + /* Since P1787 (DR 36) it is OK to redeclare entities via using-decl, + except in class scopes. */ + ok = false; else { if (!error_operand_p (bval)) @@ -5375,8 +5381,7 @@ do_nonmember_using_decl (name_lookup &lookup, bool fn_scope_p, else if (value /* Ignore anticipated builtins. */ && !anticipated_builtin_p (value) - && (fn_scope_p - || !decls_match (lookup.value, strip_using_decl (value)))) + && !decls_match (lookup.value, strip_using_decl (value))) { diagnose_name_conflict (lookup.value, value); failed = true; @@ -6648,9 +6653,6 @@ push_using_decl_bindings (name_lookup *lookup, tree name, tree value) type = binding->type; } - /* DR 36 questions why using-decls at function scope may not be - duplicates. Disallow it, as C++11 claimed and PR 20420 - implemented. */ if (lookup) do_nonmember_using_decl (*lookup, true, true, &value, &type); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C index 34f8bf4fa0b..4638181c63c 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ void f () { enum e { a }; - using e::a; // { dg-error "redeclaration" } + using e::a; // { dg-bogus "redeclaration" "P1787" } // { dg-error "enum" "" { target { ! c++2a } } .-1 } } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ff99ed422d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +// PR c++/116160 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +enum class Blah { b }; +void foo() { + using Blah::b; + using Blah::b; + using enum Blah; +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C index e91829e939a..8279c73bfc4 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C @@ -52,5 +52,5 @@ void f () { using N::i; - using N::i; // { dg-bogus "conflicts" "See P1787 (CWG36)" { xfail *-*-* } } + using N::i; // { dg-bogus "conflicts" "See P1787 (CWG36)" } }
Noticed how to fix this while working on the other patch. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? -- >8 -- This implements part of P1787 to no longer complain about redeclaring an entity via using-decl other than in a class scope. PR c++/116160 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * name-lookup.cc (supplement_binding): Allow redeclaration via USING_DECL if not in class scope. (do_nonmember_using_decl): Remove function-scope exemption. (push_using_decl_bindings): Remove outdated comment. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C: No longer expect an error. * g++.dg/lookup/using53.C: Remove XFAIL. * g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C: New test. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com> --- gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc | 12 +++++++----- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/using-enum-3.C | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C | 9 +++++++++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using53.C | 2 +- 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/using-enum-11.C