Message ID | 20241206180057.45958-1-jchrist@linux.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | s390: Fix UNSPEC_CC_TO_INT canonicalization | expand |
On 12/6/24 19:00, Juergen Christ wrote: > Canonicalization of comparisons for UNSPEC_CC_TO_INT missed one case > causing unnecessarily complex code. This especially seems to hit the > Linux kernel. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_canonicalize_comparison): Add > missing UNSPEC_CC_TO_INT case. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c: New test. Ok. Thanks! Andreas > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com> > > Bootstrapped and regression tested on s390. Okay for trunk? > Okay to backport to GCC 14? > > --- > gcc/config/s390/s390.cc | 2 +- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c > > diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc > index 25d43ae3e138..c36c33ff8280 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc > @@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ s390_canonicalize_comparison (int *code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1, > && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (*op0, 1)) > && CONST_INT_P (*op1) > && INTVAL (XEXP (*op0, 1)) == -3 > - && *code == EQ) > + && (*code == EQ || *code == NE)) > { > if (INTVAL (*op1) == 0) > { > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..e25f712e25ca > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c > @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=zEC12 -mzarch" } */ > + > +static __attribute__((always_inline)) inline > +int __atomic_dec_and_test(int *ptr) > +{ > + int cc; > + asm volatile( > + " alsi %[ptr],-1\n" > + : "=@cc" (cc), [ptr] "+QS" (*ptr) : : "memory"); > + return (cc == 0) || (cc == 2); > +} > + > +int a; > +void dummy(void); > +long fu(void) > +{ > + if (__atomic_dec_and_test(&a)) > + return 5; > + return 8; > +} > + > +void bar(void) > +{ > + if (__atomic_dec_and_test(&a)) > + dummy(); > +} > + > +int foo(int x) > +{ > + int cc; > + asm volatile ("ahi %[x],42\n" > + : [x] "+d" (x), "=@cc" (cc)); > + return !(cc == 0 || cc == 2) ? 42 : 13; > +} > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {ipm} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc index 25d43ae3e138..c36c33ff8280 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc @@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ s390_canonicalize_comparison (int *code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1, && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (*op0, 1)) && CONST_INT_P (*op1) && INTVAL (XEXP (*op0, 1)) == -3 - && *code == EQ) + && (*code == EQ || *code == NE)) { if (INTVAL (*op1) == 0) { diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e25f712e25ca --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=zEC12 -mzarch" } */ + +static __attribute__((always_inline)) inline +int __atomic_dec_and_test(int *ptr) +{ + int cc; + asm volatile( + " alsi %[ptr],-1\n" + : "=@cc" (cc), [ptr] "+QS" (*ptr) : : "memory"); + return (cc == 0) || (cc == 2); +} + +int a; +void dummy(void); +long fu(void) +{ + if (__atomic_dec_and_test(&a)) + return 5; + return 8; +} + +void bar(void) +{ + if (__atomic_dec_and_test(&a)) + dummy(); +} + +int foo(int x) +{ + int cc; + asm volatile ("ahi %[x],42\n" + : [x] "+d" (x), "=@cc" (cc)); + return !(cc == 0 || cc == 2) ? 42 : 13; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {ipm} } } */
Canonicalization of comparisons for UNSPEC_CC_TO_INT missed one case causing unnecessarily complex code. This especially seems to hit the Linux kernel. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_canonicalize_comparison): Add missing UNSPEC_CC_TO_INT case. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c: New test. Signed-off-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com> Bootstrapped and regression tested on s390. Okay for trunk? Okay to backport to GCC 14? --- gcc/config/s390/s390.cc | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/ccusage.c