Message ID | 1930502.usQuhbGJ8B@fomalhaut |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Restore RTL alias analysis for hard frame pointer | expand |
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:11 AM Eric Botcazou via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > the following change: > > 2021-07-28 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com> > > * alias.c (init_alias_analysis): Don't skip prologue/epilogue. > > broke the alias analysis for the hard frame pointer (when it is used as a > frame pointer, i.e. when the frame pointer is not eliminated) described in the > large comment at the top of the file, because static_reg_base_value is set for > it and, consequently, new_reg_base_value too. So when the instruction saving > the stack pointer into the hard frame pointer in the prologue is processed, it > is viewed as a second set of the hard frame pointer and to a different value > by record_set, which then resets new_reg_base_value to 0 and the game is over. > > This e.g. hampers the performance of the var-tracking RTL pass for parameters > passed on the stack like on x86, leading to regressions when debugging, but > code generation is very likely affected too. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86-64/Linux, OK for mainline and 12 branch? OK for trunk and 12 after a while of burn-in. Thanks, Richard. > > 2022-10-28 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> > > * alias.cc (init_alias_analysis): Do not record sets to the hard > frame pointer if the frame pointer has not been eliminated. > > -- > Eric Botcazou
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:27 PM Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:11 AM Eric Botcazou via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > the following change: > > > > 2021-07-28 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > * alias.c (init_alias_analysis): Don't skip prologue/epilogue. > > > > broke the alias analysis for the hard frame pointer (when it is used as a > > frame pointer, i.e. when the frame pointer is not eliminated) described in the > > large comment at the top of the file, because static_reg_base_value is set for > > it and, consequently, new_reg_base_value too. So when the instruction saving > > the stack pointer into the hard frame pointer in the prologue is processed, it > > is viewed as a second set of the hard frame pointer and to a different value > > by record_set, which then resets new_reg_base_value to 0 and the game is over. > > > > This e.g. hampers the performance of the var-tracking RTL pass for parameters > > passed on the stack like on x86, leading to regressions when debugging, but > > code generation is very likely affected too. > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86-64/Linux, OK for mainline and 12 branch? > > OK for trunk and 12 after a while of burn-in. Oh, do you have a testcase suitable for the testsuite? > Thanks, > Richard. > > > > > 2022-10-28 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> > > > > * alias.cc (init_alias_analysis): Do not record sets to the hard > > frame pointer if the frame pointer has not been eliminated. > > > > -- > > Eric Botcazou
> OK for trunk and 12 after a while of burn-in. Thanks! > Oh, do you have a testcase suitable for the testsuite? I only have an Ada testcase for GDB, let me try to find something more usable.
> Am 29.10.2022 um 10:19 schrieb Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>: > > >> >> OK for trunk and 12 after a while of burn-in. > > Thanks! > >> Oh, do you have a testcase suitable for the testsuite? > > I only have an Ada testcase for GDB, let me try to find something more usable. Not too bad if it works to scan-assembler for the DWARF? > -- > Eric Botcazou > >
> Oh, do you have a testcase suitable for the testsuite?
C guality testcase attached, it fails on x86/Linux with -m32 on the gcc-12
branch (which does not have the fix):
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i ==
5
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-
partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-
objects -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5
but passes on the mainline (which has the fix) and on the gcc-11 branch (which
does not have the issue). The fix also eliminates other regressions:
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/drap.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 a == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/drap.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 22 b == 6
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 35 v ==
1
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 36 e ==
&a[1]
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 40 v ==
1
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 41 e ==
&a[1]
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 x == 7
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 20 y ==
25
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 20 z ==
6
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 23 y ==
117
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 23 z ==
8
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-4.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 y ==
25
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a ==
5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b ==
6
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c ==
5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-
partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-
partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-
partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 43 a.j == 14
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5
-FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-
partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5
present on the gcc-12 branch wrt the gcc-11 branch (apparently nobody really
cares about the guality testsuite on x86/Linux).
* gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c: New test.
> Am 09.11.2022 um 10:49 schrieb Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>: > > >> >> Oh, do you have a testcase suitable for the testsuite? > > C guality testcase attached, it fails on x86/Linux with -m32 on the gcc-12 > branch (which does not have the fix): > > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5 > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5 > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == > 5 > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5 > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto- > partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5 > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto- > objects -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 i == 5 > > but passes on the mainline (which has the fix) and on the gcc-11 branch (which > does not have the issue). The fix also eliminates other regressions: > > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/drap.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 a == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/drap.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 22 b == 6 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 35 v == > 1 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 36 e == > &a[1] > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 40 v == > 1 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 41 e == > &a[1] > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 15 x == 7 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 20 y == > 25 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 20 z == > 6 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 23 y == > 117 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-3.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 23 z == > 8 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-4.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 y == > 25 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == > 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == > 6 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == > 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto- > partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 a == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto- > partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 b == 6 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto- > partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 c == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 43 a.j == 14 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O3 -g -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5 > -FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto- > partition=none -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 24 i == 5 > > present on the gcc-12 branch wrt the gcc-11 branch (apparently nobody really > cares about the guality testsuite on x86/Linux). Thanks a lot, OK. Richard > > > * gcc.dg/guality/param-6.c: New test. > > -- > Eric Botcazou > <param-6.c>
diff --git a/gcc/alias.cc b/gcc/alias.cc index d54feb15268..c62837dd854 100644 --- a/gcc/alias.cc +++ b/gcc/alias.cc @@ -3369,6 +3369,10 @@ memory_modified_in_insn_p (const_rtx mem, const_rtx insn) void init_alias_analysis (void) { + const bool frame_pointer_eliminated + = reload_completed + && !frame_pointer_needed + && targetm.can_eliminate (FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM, STACK_POINTER_REGNUM); unsigned int maxreg = max_reg_num (); int changed, pass; int i; @@ -3446,12 +3450,8 @@ init_alias_analysis (void) for (i = 0; i < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i++) if (static_reg_base_value[i] /* Don't treat the hard frame pointer as special if we - eliminated the frame pointer to the stack pointer instead. */ - && !(i == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM - && reload_completed - && !frame_pointer_needed - && targetm.can_eliminate (FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM, - STACK_POINTER_REGNUM))) + eliminated the frame pointer to the stack pointer. */ + && !(i == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM && frame_pointer_eliminated)) { new_reg_base_value[i] = static_reg_base_value[i]; bitmap_set_bit (reg_seen, i); @@ -3467,10 +3467,15 @@ init_alias_analysis (void) { rtx note, set; + /* Treat the hard frame pointer as special unless we + eliminated the frame pointer to the stack pointer. */ + if (!frame_pointer_eliminated + && modified_in_p (hard_frame_pointer_rtx, insn)) + continue; + /* If this insn has a noalias note, process it, Otherwise, scan for sets. A simple set will have no side effects which could change the base value of any other register. */ - if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == SET && REG_NOTES (insn) != 0 && find_reg_note (insn, REG_NOALIAS, NULL_RTX))