Message ID | 0102018fcef17f2d-4b47cfb7-7a37-4b48-a507-5688e26fb6a4-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Fix PR c++/109958: ICE taking the address of bound static member function brought into derived class by using-declaration | expand |
On 5/31/24 09:58, Simon Martin wrote: > From: Simon Martin <simon@nasilyan.com> > > We currently ICE upon the following because we don't properly handle the > overload created for B::f through the using statement. > > === cut here === > struct B { static int f(); }; > struct D : B { using B::f; }; > void f(D d) { &d.f; } > === cut here === > > This patch makes build_class_member_access_expr and cp_build_addr_expr_1 handle > such overloads, and fixes the PR. > > Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > PR c++/109958 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * typeck.cc (build_class_member_access_expr): Handle single OVERLOADs. > (cp_build_addr_expr_1): Likewise. OK. > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/overload/using6.C: New test. > > --- > gcc/cp/typeck.cc | 5 +++++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc > index 1b7a31d32f3..5970ac3d398 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc > @@ -3025,6 +3025,8 @@ build_class_member_access_expr (cp_expr object, tree member, > know the type of the expression. Otherwise, we must wait > until overload resolution has been performed. */ > functions = BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (member); > + if (TREE_CODE (functions) == OVERLOAD && OVL_SINGLE_P (functions)) > + functions = OVL_FIRST (functions); > if (TREE_CODE (functions) == FUNCTION_DECL > && DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (functions)) > type = TREE_TYPE (functions); > @@ -7333,6 +7335,9 @@ cp_build_addr_expr_1 (tree arg, bool strict_lvalue, tsubst_flags_t complain) > { > tree fn = BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)); > > + if (TREE_CODE (fn) == OVERLOAD && OVL_SINGLE_P (fn)) > + fn = OVL_FIRST (fn); > + > /* We can only get here with a single static member > function. */ > gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (fn) == FUNCTION_DECL > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..4f89f68a30f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +// PR c++/109958 > + > +struct B { static int f(); }; > +struct D : B { using B::f; }; > +void f(D d) { &d.f; }
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc index 1b7a31d32f3..5970ac3d398 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc @@ -3025,6 +3025,8 @@ build_class_member_access_expr (cp_expr object, tree member, know the type of the expression. Otherwise, we must wait until overload resolution has been performed. */ functions = BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (member); + if (TREE_CODE (functions) == OVERLOAD && OVL_SINGLE_P (functions)) + functions = OVL_FIRST (functions); if (TREE_CODE (functions) == FUNCTION_DECL && DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (functions)) type = TREE_TYPE (functions); @@ -7333,6 +7335,9 @@ cp_build_addr_expr_1 (tree arg, bool strict_lvalue, tsubst_flags_t complain) { tree fn = BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (TREE_OPERAND (arg, 1)); + if (TREE_CODE (fn) == OVERLOAD && OVL_SINGLE_P (fn)) + fn = OVL_FIRST (fn); + /* We can only get here with a single static member function. */ gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (fn) == FUNCTION_DECL diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4f89f68a30f --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +// PR c++/109958 + +struct B { static int f(); }; +struct D : B { using B::f; }; +void f(D d) { &d.f; }
From: Simon Martin <simon@nasilyan.com> We currently ICE upon the following because we don't properly handle the overload created for B::f through the using statement. === cut here === struct B { static int f(); }; struct D : B { using B::f; }; void f(D d) { &d.f; } === cut here === This patch makes build_class_member_access_expr and cp_build_addr_expr_1 handle such overloads, and fixes the PR. Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. PR c++/109958 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * typeck.cc (build_class_member_access_expr): Handle single OVERLOADs. (cp_build_addr_expr_1): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/overload/using6.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/typeck.cc | 5 +++++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/using6.C