Message ID | 20150304062009.GB8014@kentang.lan |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. > MAINTAINERS | 3 + > hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- > hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- > hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- > hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- > hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- > hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- > pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes > qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? -- PMM
On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland > <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. > >> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- > > Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the > pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve bisection. As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring everything up to date. ATB, Mark.
On 8 March 2015 at 19:04, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: > On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland >> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. >> >>> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >>> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >>> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >>> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- >> >> Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the >> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? > > I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because > without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the > QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to > leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which > is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve > bisection. > > As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches > and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring > everything up to date. Hmm. I'm not a huge fan of having the binary in git and the submodule reference be out of step... Alex, I guess PPC is the other openbios user -- does this make sense to you? -- PMM
On 08/03/15 10:31, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 March 2015 at 19:04, Mark Cave-Ayland > <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >> On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >>> On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland >>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>> Hi Peter, >>>> >>>> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. >>> >>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >>>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >>>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >>>> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >>>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >>>> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>>> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >>>> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- >>> >>> Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the >>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? >> >> I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because >> without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the >> QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to >> leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which >> is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve >> bisection. >> >> As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches >> and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring >> everything up to date. > > Hmm. I'm not a huge fan of having the binary in git and the submodule > reference be out of step... Alternatively if you have shell access to git.qemu.org then I can commit just the MMIO accessor changes to SVN trunk now and then with a manual update to the OpenBIOS git mirror I can re-send the signed pull request with updated binaries? I've deliberately held off applying patches to OpenBIOS SVN trunk in case this was the preferred method as I'm keen to be able to bisect down to this particular change on SPARC64. ATB, Mark.
On 08.03.15 06:57, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 08/03/15 10:31, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 8 March 2015 at 19:04, Mark Cave-Ayland >> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>> On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> >>>> On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland >>>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. >>>> >>>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >>>>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >>>>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >>>>> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >>>>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >>>>> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>>>> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >>>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >>>>> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- >>>> >>>> Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the >>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? >>> >>> I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because >>> without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the >>> QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to >>> leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which >>> is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve >>> bisection. >>> >>> As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches >>> and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring >>> everything up to date. >> >> Hmm. I'm not a huge fan of having the binary in git and the submodule >> reference be out of step... > > Alternatively if you have shell access to git.qemu.org then I can commit > just the MMIO accessor changes to SVN trunk now and then with a manual > update to the OpenBIOS git mirror I can re-send the signed pull request > with updated binaries? I've deliberately held off applying patches to > OpenBIOS SVN trunk in case this was the preferred method as I'm keen to > be able to bisect down to this particular change on SPARC64. Is there any way to make the change backwards compatible, so that we don't need to sync versions? Alex
On 08/03/15 20:48, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 08.03.15 06:57, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >> On 08/03/15 10:31, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >>> On 8 March 2015 at 19:04, Mark Cave-Ayland >>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>> On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland >>>>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. >>>>> >>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >>>>>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >>>>>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >>>>>> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >>>>>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >>>>>> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>>>>> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >>>>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >>>>>> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- >>>>> >>>>> Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the >>>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? >>>> >>>> I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because >>>> without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the >>>> QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to >>>> leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which >>>> is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve >>>> bisection. >>>> >>>> As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches >>>> and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring >>>> everything up to date. >>> >>> Hmm. I'm not a huge fan of having the binary in git and the submodule >>> reference be out of step... >> >> Alternatively if you have shell access to git.qemu.org then I can commit >> just the MMIO accessor changes to SVN trunk now and then with a manual >> update to the OpenBIOS git mirror I can re-send the signed pull request >> with updated binaries? I've deliberately held off applying patches to >> OpenBIOS SVN trunk in case this was the preferred method as I'm keen to >> be able to bisect down to this particular change on SPARC64. > > Is there any way to make the change backwards compatible, so that we > don't need to sync versions? Not without refactoring to enable more than one type of NVRAM accessor in OpenBIOS, plus a fw_cfg variable to enable the switch between the two for SPARC64. Given that SPARC64 is still more experimental than stable plus newer versions of OpenBIOS aren't guaranteed to work with older versions of QEMU anyhow, I just can't see that this is worth all the extra effort for the sake of a follow-up pull request within a day or so that will bring everything up to date whilst still allowing a proper bisection. Now if Peter is still keen to keep the git submodule reference intact then I'm happy to commit just the MMIO accessor changes to OpenBIOS SVN trunk as long as we can minimise the time between the QEMU changes and the OpenBIOS changes. ATB, Mark.
> Am 08.03.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>: > >> On 08/03/15 20:48, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> On 08.03.15 06:57, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >>>> On 08/03/15 10:31, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> >>>> On 8 March 2015 at 19:04, Mark Cave-Ayland >>>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland >>>>>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. >>>>>> >>>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >>>>>>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >>>>>>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >>>>>>> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>>>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >>>>>>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >>>>>>> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>>>>>> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >>>>>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >>>>>>> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- >>>>>> >>>>>> Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the >>>>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? >>>>> >>>>> I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because >>>>> without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the >>>>> QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to >>>>> leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which >>>>> is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve >>>>> bisection. >>>>> >>>>> As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches >>>>> and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring >>>>> everything up to date. >>>> >>>> Hmm. I'm not a huge fan of having the binary in git and the submodule >>>> reference be out of step... >>> >>> Alternatively if you have shell access to git.qemu.org then I can commit >>> just the MMIO accessor changes to SVN trunk now and then with a manual >>> update to the OpenBIOS git mirror I can re-send the signed pull request >>> with updated binaries? I've deliberately held off applying patches to >>> OpenBIOS SVN trunk in case this was the preferred method as I'm keen to >>> be able to bisect down to this particular change on SPARC64. >> >> Is there any way to make the change backwards compatible, so that we >> don't need to sync versions? > > Not without refactoring to enable more than one type of NVRAM accessor > in OpenBIOS, plus a fw_cfg variable to enable the switch between the two > for SPARC64. > > Given that SPARC64 is still more experimental than stable plus newer > versions of OpenBIOS aren't guaranteed to work with older versions of > QEMU anyhow, I just can't see that this is worth all the extra effort > for the sake of a follow-up pull request within a day or so that will > bring everything up to date whilst still allowing a proper bisection. > > Now if Peter is still keen to keep the git submodule reference intact > then I'm happy to commit just the MMIO accessor changes to OpenBIOS SVN > trunk as long as we can minimise the time between the QEMU changes and > the OpenBIOS changes. Yes, I think that's a reasonable way forward. Maybe add a fw_cfg and assert() on it nevertheless, so people don't fall into pits ;). Alex
On 08/03/15 21:05, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Am 08.03.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>: >> >>> On 08/03/15 20:48, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>>> On 08.03.15 06:57, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >>>>> On 08/03/15 10:31, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 8 March 2015 at 19:04, Mark Cave-Ayland >>>>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>> On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland >>>>>>> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >>>>>>>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >>>>>>>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >>>>>>>> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>>>>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >>>>>>>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >>>>>>>> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>>>>>>> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >>>>>>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >>>>>>>> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the >>>>>>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because >>>>>> without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the >>>>>> QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to >>>>>> leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which >>>>>> is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve >>>>>> bisection. >>>>>> >>>>>> As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches >>>>>> and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring >>>>>> everything up to date. >>>>> >>>>> Hmm. I'm not a huge fan of having the binary in git and the submodule >>>>> reference be out of step... >>>> >>>> Alternatively if you have shell access to git.qemu.org then I can commit >>>> just the MMIO accessor changes to SVN trunk now and then with a manual >>>> update to the OpenBIOS git mirror I can re-send the signed pull request >>>> with updated binaries? I've deliberately held off applying patches to >>>> OpenBIOS SVN trunk in case this was the preferred method as I'm keen to >>>> be able to bisect down to this particular change on SPARC64. >>> >>> Is there any way to make the change backwards compatible, so that we >>> don't need to sync versions? >> >> Not without refactoring to enable more than one type of NVRAM accessor >> in OpenBIOS, plus a fw_cfg variable to enable the switch between the two >> for SPARC64. >> >> Given that SPARC64 is still more experimental than stable plus newer >> versions of OpenBIOS aren't guaranteed to work with older versions of >> QEMU anyhow, I just can't see that this is worth all the extra effort >> for the sake of a follow-up pull request within a day or so that will >> bring everything up to date whilst still allowing a proper bisection. >> >> Now if Peter is still keen to keep the git submodule reference intact >> then I'm happy to commit just the MMIO accessor changes to OpenBIOS SVN >> trunk as long as we can minimise the time between the QEMU changes and >> the OpenBIOS changes. > > Yes, I think that's a reasonable way forward. Maybe add a fw_cfg and assert() on it nevertheless, so people don't fall into pits ;). If you're trying to run an old SPARC32/64 OpenBIOS on a newer QEMU then there are already several pits you could have fallen into ;) And given that no-one has reported any issues with this to date then I don't think it will be a problem. As it looks like this will happen shortly, I'll go commit the MMIO changes for SPARC64 to OpenBIOS SVN trunk now. Then as soon as the git mirror syncs I'll send an updated PULLv2 for Peter. ATB, Mark.