diff mbox

powerpc: fix typo 'CONFIG_PMAC'

Message ID 1400617498.4912.66.camel@x220 (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Paul Bolle May 20, 2014, 8:24 p.m. UTC
Commit b0d278b7d3ae ("powerpc/perf_event: Reduce latency of calling
perf_event_do_pending") added a check for CONFIG_PMAC were a check for
CONFIG_PPC_PMAC was clearly intended.

Fixes: b0d278b7d3ae ("powerpc/perf_event: Reduce latency of calling perf_event_do_pending")
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
---
Untested. Needs testing on 32 bit powermac, I guess.

This typo was introduced in v2.6.36. No one noticed because very few
people still use 32 bit powermacs?

 arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andreas Schwab May 21, 2014, 4:08 p.m. UTC | #1
Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> writes:

> Commit b0d278b7d3ae ("powerpc/perf_event: Reduce latency of calling
> perf_event_do_pending") added a check for CONFIG_PMAC were a check for
> CONFIG_PPC_PMAC was clearly intended.
>
> Fixes: b0d278b7d3ae ("powerpc/perf_event: Reduce latency of calling perf_event_do_pending")
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> Untested. Needs testing on 32 bit powermac, I guess.
>
> This typo was introduced in v2.6.36. No one noticed because very few
> people still use 32 bit powermacs?

How does that bug manifest itself?

Andreas.
Paul Bolle May 22, 2014, 7:10 a.m. UTC | #2
Andreas,

On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 18:08 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> writes:
> 
> > Commit b0d278b7d3ae ("powerpc/perf_event: Reduce latency of calling
> > perf_event_do_pending") added a check for CONFIG_PMAC were a check for
> > CONFIG_PPC_PMAC was clearly intended.
> >
> > Fixes: b0d278b7d3ae ("powerpc/perf_event: Reduce latency of calling perf_event_do_pending")
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> > ---
> > Untested. Needs testing on 32 bit powermac, I guess.
> >
> > This typo was introduced in v2.6.36. No one noticed because very few
> > people still use 32 bit powermacs?
> 
> How does that bug manifest itself?

Do you want to know how to test this patch on a 32 bit powermac? Ie, see
if it has any effect, and whether that effect improves things or make
things worse.

I have no clue how to do that, sorry. Perhaps someone else has.


Paul Bolle
Andreas Schwab May 22, 2014, 4:47 p.m. UTC | #3
Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> writes:

> Do you want to know how to test this patch on a 32 bit powermac? Ie, see
> if it has any effect, and whether that effect improves things or make
> things worse.

Yes.

Andreas.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
index 122a580f7322..bb3cfa10a4ea 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@  void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * regs)
 	may_hard_irq_enable();
 

-#if defined(CONFIG_PPC32) && defined(CONFIG_PMAC)
+#if defined(CONFIG_PPC32) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC)
 	if (atomic_read(&ppc_n_lost_interrupts) != 0)
 		do_IRQ(regs);
 #endif