| Message ID | 20121219154615.GA17584@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Am 19.12.2012 16:46, schrieb Gleb Natapov: > > Replace Avi with myself as kvm maintainer. > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> That solves my mail bounce issue, too. If you put yourself as main KVM maintainer in Avi's place, note that I received zero feedback from Marcelo on my CPU series, which I therefore just included in my pull request: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02963.html You may have also missed this follow-up that just went out: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg03000.html They are mostly mechanical code movements that have been tested on x86_64, ppc and s390x KVM hosts, including the stubs. Andreas > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 2ede20d..0e574f9 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Guest CPU Cores (KVM): > ---------------------- > > Overall > -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > L: kvm@vger.kernel.org > S: Supported > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ S: Maintained > F: target-s390x/kvm.c > > X86 > -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > L: kvm@vger.kernel.org > S: Supported > -- > Gleb.
Il 19/12/2012 17:00, Andreas Färber ha scritto: > If you put yourself as main KVM maintainer in Avi's place, note that I > received zero feedback from Marcelo on my CPU series, which I therefore > just included in my pull request: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02963.html I had looked at that one. I wasn't really done so I didn't send a Reviewed-by message. Paolo
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:00:40PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 19.12.2012 16:46, schrieb Gleb Natapov: > > > > Replace Avi with myself as kvm maintainer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > > That solves my mail bounce issue, too. > > If you put yourself as main KVM maintainer in Avi's place, note that I > received zero feedback from Marcelo on my CPU series, which I therefore > just included in my pull request: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02963.html Because i have zero feedback to give, sorry. Did not review line-by-line, though, if that is what you're expecting. > You may have also missed this follow-up that just went out: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg03000.html > > They are mostly mechanical code movements that have been tested on > x86_64, ppc and s390x KVM hosts, including the stubs. > > Andreas > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 2ede20d..0e574f9 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Guest CPU Cores (KVM): > > ---------------------- > > > > Overall > > -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > > +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > > M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > > L: kvm@vger.kernel.org > > S: Supported > > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ S: Maintained > > F: target-s390x/kvm.c > > > > X86 > > -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > > +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > > M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > > L: kvm@vger.kernel.org > > S: Supported > > -- > > Gleb. > > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
Am 19.12.2012 17:33, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:00:40PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 19.12.2012 16:46, schrieb Gleb Natapov: >>> >>> Replace Avi with myself as kvm maintainer. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> >> >> That solves my mail bounce issue, too. >> >> If you put yourself as main KVM maintainer in Avi's place, note that I >> received zero feedback from Marcelo on my CPU series, which I therefore >> just included in my pull request: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02963.html > > Because i have zero feedback to give, sorry. Did not review > line-by-line, though, if that is what you're expecting. I would've been okay with a simple "fine with me if it doesn't break anything" or a "please defer until X". :) I'm also surprised that there's been no KVM pull since v1.3 - are you expecting Anthony to pick up KVM'ish patches himself now? Otherwise, someone mentioned qemu-kvm.git were no longer updated - if that is true, where will you be staging pulls? Andreas
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:05:10PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 19.12.2012 17:33, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:00:40PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Am 19.12.2012 16:46, schrieb Gleb Natapov: > >>> > >>> Replace Avi with myself as kvm maintainer. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > >> > >> That solves my mail bounce issue, too. > >> > >> If you put yourself as main KVM maintainer in Avi's place, note that I > >> received zero feedback from Marcelo on my CPU series, which I therefore > >> just included in my pull request: > >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02963.html > > > > Because i have zero feedback to give, sorry. Did not review > > line-by-line, though, if that is what you're expecting. > > I would've been okay with a simple "fine with me if it doesn't break > anything" or a "please defer until X". :) > > I'm also surprised that there's been no KVM pull since v1.3 - are you > expecting Anthony to pick up KVM'ish patches himself now? Otherwise, > someone mentioned qemu-kvm.git were no longer updated - if that is true, > where will you be staging pulls? qemu-kvm is obsolete - qemu-kvm users should switch to qemu 1.3. Staging: uq/master branch of http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git. Was fighting autotest failures which are now gone, there will be a pull request for the one patch in the branch asap.
Am 19.12.2012 20:12, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:05:10PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: >> I'm also surprised that there's been no KVM pull since v1.3 - are you >> expecting Anthony to pick up KVM'ish patches himself now? Otherwise, >> someone mentioned qemu-kvm.git were no longer updated - if that is true, >> where will you be staging pulls? > > qemu-kvm is obsolete - qemu-kvm users should switch to qemu 1.3. > > Staging: uq/master branch of http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git. > Was fighting autotest failures which are now gone, there will be a pull > request for the one patch in the branch asap. Ah, so only the master branch is obsolete. FYI I've tagged v0.15.2 shortly after KVM Forum, only the announcement detailing the added commits is still on my TODO list. Andreas
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes: > Replace Avi with myself as kvm maintainer. > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 2ede20d..0e574f9 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Guest CPU Cores (KVM): > ---------------------- > > Overall > -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > L: kvm@vger.kernel.org > S: Supported > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ S: Maintained > F: target-s390x/kvm.c > > X86 > -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> > M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > L: kvm@vger.kernel.org > S: Supported > -- > Gleb.
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 2ede20d..0e574f9 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Guest CPU Cores (KVM): ---------------------- Overall -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> L: kvm@vger.kernel.org S: Supported @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ S: Maintained F: target-s390x/kvm.c X86 -M: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> +M: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> M: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> L: kvm@vger.kernel.org S: Supported
Replace Avi with myself as kvm maintainer. Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> -- Gleb.