Message ID | 20241105-rk3399-sysreset-gpio-tpl-v1-4-12caff07a4e4@cherry.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | rockchip: rk3399: allow to trigger sysreset in TPL | expand |
Hi, Le Tue 05 Nov 24, 16:36, Quentin Schulz a écrit : > From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de> > > If TPL_GPIO and TPL_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP are enabled and a sysreset-gpio is > provided in the TPL Device Tree, this will trigger a system reset > similar to what's currently been done in SPL whenever the RK3399 "warm" > boots. > > There are three reasons for moving this earlier: > - faster boot time as we don't need to reach SPL to be able to reset the > system on a condition we know is already met in TPL, > - have less code to be impacted by the issue this system reset works > around (that is, "unclean" SoC registers after a reboot), > - less confusion around the reason for restarting. Indeed when done from > SPL, the following log can be observed: > > """ > U-Boot TPL 2025.01-rc1-00165-gd79216ca9878-dirty (Nov 05 2024 - 15:31:45) > Channel 0: DDR3, 666MHz > BW=32 Col=10 Bk=8 CS0 Row=16 CS=1 Die BW=16 Size=2048MB > Channel 1: DDR3, 666MHz > BW=32 Col=10 Bk=8 CS0 Row=16 CS=1 Die BW=16 Size=2048MB > 256B stride > Trying to boot from BOOTROM > Returning to boot ROM... > > U-Boot SPL 2025.01-rc1-00165-gd79216ca9878-dirty (Nov 05 2024 - 15:31:45 +0100) > Trying to boot from MMC2 > > U-Boot TPL 2025.01-rc1-00165-gd79216ca9878-dirty (Nov 05 2024 - 15:31:45) > """ > > possibly hinting at an issue within the SPL when loading the fitImage > from MMC2 instead of the normal course of events (a system reset). > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de> Reviewed-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@sys-base.io> See a nit below. Cheers, Paul > --- > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c > index 7b6a822ed04b8151a5da147056dbf73ffdafd149..26fd04691699d81f5fecd282964c7b3aff999717 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void board_debug_uart_init(void) > } > #endif > > -#if defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) > +#if defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) > static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) > { > const struct rockchip_cru *cru = rockchip_get_cru(); > @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) > if (cru->glb_rst_st == 0) > return; > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_GPIO)) { > + if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(GPIO)) { > debug("%s: trying to force a power-on reset but no GPIO " > - "support in SPL!\n", __func__); > + "support in " PHASE_NAME "!\n", __func__); > return; > } > > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) > dm_gpio_set_value(&sysreset_gpio, 1); > } > > +# if !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) Coding style in the file doesn't put a space after # (even when nested). > void __weak led_setup(void) > { > } > @@ -228,4 +229,10 @@ void spl_board_init(void) > > rk3399_force_power_on_reset(); > } > -#endif > +# else // !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) Ditto and also doesn't have such comments. > +void tpl_board_init(void) > +{ > + rk3399_force_power_on_reset(); > +} > +# endif // !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) Ditto. > +#endif // defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) > > -- > 2.47.0 >
Hi again, Le Tue 05 Nov 24, 16:36, Quentin Schulz a écrit : > From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de> > > If TPL_GPIO and TPL_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP are enabled and a sysreset-gpio is > provided in the TPL Device Tree, this will trigger a system reset > similar to what's currently been done in SPL whenever the RK3399 "warm" > boots. > > There are three reasons for moving this earlier: > - faster boot time as we don't need to reach SPL to be able to reset the > system on a condition we know is already met in TPL, > - have less code to be impacted by the issue this system reset works > around (that is, "unclean" SoC registers after a reboot), > - less confusion around the reason for restarting. Indeed when done from > SPL, the following log can be observed: Just one other thing here: you could as well remove the call in spl_board_init. There's just one user of this currently (the Puma board) so I don't think we need to keep backwards-compatibility in the SPL. Cheers, Paul > """ > U-Boot TPL 2025.01-rc1-00165-gd79216ca9878-dirty (Nov 05 2024 - 15:31:45) > Channel 0: DDR3, 666MHz > BW=32 Col=10 Bk=8 CS0 Row=16 CS=1 Die BW=16 Size=2048MB > Channel 1: DDR3, 666MHz > BW=32 Col=10 Bk=8 CS0 Row=16 CS=1 Die BW=16 Size=2048MB > 256B stride > Trying to boot from BOOTROM > Returning to boot ROM... > > U-Boot SPL 2025.01-rc1-00165-gd79216ca9878-dirty (Nov 05 2024 - 15:31:45 +0100) > Trying to boot from MMC2 > > U-Boot TPL 2025.01-rc1-00165-gd79216ca9878-dirty (Nov 05 2024 - 15:31:45) > """ > > possibly hinting at an issue within the SPL when loading the fitImage > from MMC2 instead of the normal course of events (a system reset). > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de> > --- > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c > index 7b6a822ed04b8151a5da147056dbf73ffdafd149..26fd04691699d81f5fecd282964c7b3aff999717 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void board_debug_uart_init(void) > } > #endif > > -#if defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) > +#if defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) > static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) > { > const struct rockchip_cru *cru = rockchip_get_cru(); > @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) > if (cru->glb_rst_st == 0) > return; > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_GPIO)) { > + if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(GPIO)) { > debug("%s: trying to force a power-on reset but no GPIO " > - "support in SPL!\n", __func__); > + "support in " PHASE_NAME "!\n", __func__); > return; > } > > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) > dm_gpio_set_value(&sysreset_gpio, 1); > } > > +# if !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) > void __weak led_setup(void) > { > } > @@ -228,4 +229,10 @@ void spl_board_init(void) > > rk3399_force_power_on_reset(); > } > -#endif > +# else // !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) > +void tpl_board_init(void) > +{ > + rk3399_force_power_on_reset(); > +} > +# endif // !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) > +#endif // defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) > > -- > 2.47.0 >
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c index 7b6a822ed04b8151a5da147056dbf73ffdafd149..26fd04691699d81f5fecd282964c7b3aff999717 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void board_debug_uart_init(void) } #endif -#if defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) +#if defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD) static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) { const struct rockchip_cru *cru = rockchip_get_cru(); @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) if (cru->glb_rst_st == 0) return; - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_GPIO)) { + if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(GPIO)) { debug("%s: trying to force a power-on reset but no GPIO " - "support in SPL!\n", __func__); + "support in " PHASE_NAME "!\n", __func__); return; } @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static void rk3399_force_power_on_reset(void) dm_gpio_set_value(&sysreset_gpio, 1); } +# if !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) void __weak led_setup(void) { } @@ -228,4 +229,10 @@ void spl_board_init(void) rk3399_force_power_on_reset(); } -#endif +# else // !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) +void tpl_board_init(void) +{ + rk3399_force_power_on_reset(); +} +# endif // !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD) +#endif // defined(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD)