| Message ID | 20240301101035.1230024-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 380cb2f4df78433f64847cbc655fad2650e4769c |
| Headers | show |
| Series | selftests/powerpc: Fix fpu_signal failures | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_ppctests | success | Successfully ran 8 jobs. |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_selftests | success | Successfully ran 8 jobs. |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse | success | Successfully ran 4 jobs. |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang | success | Successfully ran 6 jobs. |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu | success | Successfully ran 23 jobs. |
On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 21:10:35 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > My recent commit e5d00aaac651 ("selftests/powerpc: Check all FPRs in > fpu_preempt") inadvertently broke the fpu_signal test. > > It needs to take into account that fpu_preempt now loads 32 FPRs, so > enlarge darray. > > Also use the newly added randomise_darray() to properly randomise darray. > > [...] Applied to powerpc/fixes. [1/1] selftests/powerpc: Fix fpu_signal failures https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/380cb2f4df78433f64847cbc655fad2650e4769c cheers
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_signal.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_signal.c index 7b1addd50420..8a64f63e37ce 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_signal.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_signal.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include <pthread.h> #include "utils.h" +#include "fpu.h" /* Number of times each thread should receive the signal */ #define ITERATIONS 10 @@ -27,9 +28,7 @@ */ #define THREAD_FACTOR 8 -__thread double darray[] = {0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, - 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, - 2.1}; +__thread double darray[32]; bool bad_context; int threads_starting; @@ -43,9 +42,9 @@ void signal_fpu_sig(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *context) ucontext_t *uc = context; mcontext_t *mc = &uc->uc_mcontext; - /* Only the non volatiles were loaded up */ - for (i = 14; i < 32; i++) { - if (mc->fp_regs[i] != darray[i - 14]) { + // Don't check f30/f31, they're used as scratches in check_all_fprs() + for (i = 0; i < 30; i++) { + if (mc->fp_regs[i] != darray[i]) { bad_context = true; break; } @@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ void signal_fpu_sig(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *context) void *signal_fpu_c(void *p) { - int i; long rc; struct sigaction act; act.sa_sigaction = signal_fpu_sig; @@ -64,9 +62,7 @@ void *signal_fpu_c(void *p) return p; srand(pthread_self()); - for (i = 0; i < 21; i++) - darray[i] = rand(); - + randomise_darray(darray, ARRAY_SIZE(darray)); rc = preempt_fpu(darray, &threads_starting, &running); return (void *) rc;
My recent commit e5d00aaac651 ("selftests/powerpc: Check all FPRs in fpu_preempt") inadvertently broke the fpu_signal test. It needs to take into account that fpu_preempt now loads 32 FPRs, so enlarge darray. Also use the newly added randomise_darray() to properly randomise darray. Finally the checking done in signal_fpu_sig() needs to skip checking f30/f31, because they are used as scratch registers in check_all_fprs(), called by preempt_fpu(), and so could hold other values when the signal is taken. Fixes: e5d00aaac651 ("selftests/powerpc: Check all FPRs in fpu_preempt") Depends-on: 2ba107f6795d ("selftests/powerpc: Generate better bit patterns for FPU tests") Reported-by: Spoorthy <spoorthy@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> --- .../testing/selftests/powerpc/math/fpu_signal.c | 16 ++++++---------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)