Message ID | 20240219011739.2316619-1-sergey.kambalin@auriga.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Raspberry Pi 4B machine | expand |
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 01:19, Sergey Kambalin <serg.oker@gmail.com> wrote: > > Introducing Raspberry Pi 4B model. > It contains new BCM2838 SoC, PCIE subsystem, > RNG200, Thermal sensor and Genet network controller. > > It can work with recent linux kernels 6.x.x. > Two avocado tests was added to check that. > > Unit tests has been made as read/write operations > via mailbox properties. > > Genet integration test is under development. > > Every single commit > 1) builds without errors > 2) passes regression tests > 3) passes style check* > *the only exception is bcm2838-mbox-property-test.c file > containing heavy macros usage which cause a lot of > false-positives of checkpatch.pl. > > I did my best to keep the commits less than 200 changes, > but had to make some of them a bit more in order to > keep their integrity. > > This is v5 patchset with the most of v1..v4 comments fixed. I reviewed quite a lot of v4, but I don't see any of my Reviewed-by tags in this version. Did you really change every patch so much you had to drop the tags? thanks -- PMM
Hi Peter! Sorry, it wasn't intentional. How can I keep the tags from v4? Thanks, Sergey Kambalin Software Developer, Auriga Inc.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 18:15, Kambalin, Sergey <sergey.kambalin@auriga.com> wrote: > > Hi Peter! > > Sorry, it wasn't intentional. > > How can I keep the tags from v4? If I reply with a 'Reviewed-by:' tag on a patch, and you don't make major changes for the next version, copy that tag into the commit message so it appears there under your 'Signed-off-by:' tag when you post a subsequent version of the patchset. thanks -- PMM