diff mbox series

[v2] uapi/auxvec: Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 aux vector, entries

Message ID a406b535-dc55-4856-8ae9-5a063644a1af@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 3281366a8e79a512956382885091565db1036b64
Headers show
Series [v2] uapi/auxvec: Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 aux vector, entries | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse success Successfully ran 4 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang success Successfully ran 6 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu success Successfully ran 23 jobs.

Commit Message

Peter Bergner Feb. 14, 2024, 10:34 p.m. UTC 
Changes from v1:
- Add Acked-by lines.

The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in our TCB for fast
access by the __builtin_cpu_supports built-in function.  The TCB space for
the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI extension, so
waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until we need them is
problematical.  Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the generic uapi header
so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the powerpc TCB for their
future use.

I scanned through the Linux and GLIBC source codes looking for unused AT_*
values and 29 and 30 did not seem to be used, so they are what I went
with.  This has received Acked-by's from both GLIBC and Linux kernel
developers and no reservations or Nacks from anyone.

Arnd, we seem to have consensus on the patch below.  Is this something
you could take and apply to your tree? 

Peter


Signed-off-by: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> (glibc)
Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> (powerpc)
Acked-by: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> (arm)

---
 include/uapi/linux/auxvec.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Feb. 15, 2024, 8:16 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 23:34, Peter Bergner wrote:
> The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in our TCB for fast
> access by the __builtin_cpu_supports built-in function.  The TCB space for
> the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI extension, so
> waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until we need them is
> problematical.  Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the generic uapi header
> so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the powerpc TCB for their
> future use.
>
> I scanned through the Linux and GLIBC source codes looking for unused AT_*
> values and 29 and 30 did not seem to be used, so they are what I went
> with.  This has received Acked-by's from both GLIBC and Linux kernel
> developers and no reservations or Nacks from anyone.
>
> Arnd, we seem to have consensus on the patch below.  Is this something
> you could take and apply to your tree? 
>

I don't mind taking it, but it may be better to use the
powerpc tree if that is where it's actually being used.

If Michael takes it, please add

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

      Arnd
Peter Bergner Feb. 15, 2024, 2:39 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 2/15/24 2:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 23:34, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in our TCB for fast
>> access by the __builtin_cpu_supports built-in function.  The TCB space for
>> the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI extension, so
>> waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until we need them is
>> problematical.  Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the generic uapi header
>> so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the powerpc TCB for their
>> future use.
>>
>> I scanned through the Linux and GLIBC source codes looking for unused AT_*
>> values and 29 and 30 did not seem to be used, so they are what I went
>> with.  This has received Acked-by's from both GLIBC and Linux kernel
>> developers and no reservations or Nacks from anyone.
>>
>> Arnd, we seem to have consensus on the patch below.  Is this something
>> you could take and apply to your tree? 
>>
> 
> I don't mind taking it, but it may be better to use the
> powerpc tree if that is where it's actually being used.

So this is not a powerpc only patch, but we may be the first arch
to use it.  Szabolcs mentioned that aarch64 was pretty quickly filling
up their AT_HWCAP2 and that they will eventually require using AT_HWCAP3
as well.  If you still think this should go through the powerpc tree,
I can check on that.

Peter
Michael Ellerman Feb. 16, 2024, 1:49 a.m. UTC | #3 
Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> On 2/15/24 2:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 23:34, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in our TCB for fast
>>> access by the __builtin_cpu_supports built-in function.  The TCB space for
>>> the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI extension, so
>>> waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until we need them is
>>> problematical.  Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the generic uapi header
>>> so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the powerpc TCB for their
>>> future use.
>>>
>>> I scanned through the Linux and GLIBC source codes looking for unused AT_*
>>> values and 29 and 30 did not seem to be used, so they are what I went
>>> with.  This has received Acked-by's from both GLIBC and Linux kernel
>>> developers and no reservations or Nacks from anyone.
>>>
>>> Arnd, we seem to have consensus on the patch below.  Is this something
>>> you could take and apply to your tree? 
>>>
>> 
>> I don't mind taking it, but it may be better to use the
>> powerpc tree if that is where it's actually being used.
>
> So this is not a powerpc only patch, but we may be the first arch
> to use it.  Szabolcs mentioned that aarch64 was pretty quickly filling
> up their AT_HWCAP2 and that they will eventually require using AT_HWCAP3
> as well.  If you still think this should go through the powerpc tree,
> I can check on that.

I'm happy to take it with Arnd's ack.

I trimmed up the commit message a bit, see below.

cheers


Author:     Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed Feb 14 16:34:06 2024 -0600
Commit:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
CommitDate: Fri Feb 16 12:42:59 2024 +1100

    uapi/auxvec: Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 aux vector, entries

    The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in the TCB
    for fast access by the __builtin_cpu_supports() built-in function. The
    TCB space for the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI
    extension, so waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until
    they are needed is problematic. Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the
    generic uapi header so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the
    powerpc TCB for their future use.

    I scanned through the Linux and GLIBC source codes looking for unused
    AT_* values and 29 and 30 did not seem to be used, so they are what I
    went with.

    Signed-off-by: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
    Acked-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
    Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
    Acked-by: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
    Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
    Link: https://msgid.link/a406b535-dc55-4856-8ae9-5a063644a1af@linux.ibm.com
Peter Bergner Feb. 16, 2024, 4:13 a.m. UTC | #4 
On 2/15/24 7:49 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> On 2/15/24 2:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 23:34, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>>> Arnd, we seem to have consensus on the patch below.  Is this something
>>>> you could take and apply to your tree? 
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't mind taking it, but it may be better to use the
>>> powerpc tree if that is where it's actually being used.
>>
>> So this is not a powerpc only patch, but we may be the first arch
>> to use it.  Szabolcs mentioned that aarch64 was pretty quickly filling
>> up their AT_HWCAP2 and that they will eventually require using AT_HWCAP3
>> as well.  If you still think this should go through the powerpc tree,
>> I can check on that.
> 
> I'm happy to take it with Arnd's ack.
> 
> I trimmed up the commit message a bit, see below.

Perfect.  Thanks everyone!

Peter
Michael Ellerman Feb. 20, 2024, 12:53 p.m. UTC | #5 
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:34:06 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Changes from v1:
> - Add Acked-by lines.
> 
> The powerpc toolchain keeps a copy of the HWCAP bit masks in our TCB for fast
> access by the __builtin_cpu_supports built-in function.  The TCB space for
> the HWCAP entries - which are created in pairs - is an ABI extension, so
> waiting to create the space for HWCAP3 and HWCAP4 until we need them is
> problematical.  Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 in the generic uapi header
> so they can be used in glibc to reserve space in the powerpc TCB for their
> future use.
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] uapi/auxvec: Define AT_HWCAP3 and AT_HWCAP4 aux vector, entries
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3281366a8e79a512956382885091565db1036b64

cheers
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/auxvec.h b/include/uapi/linux/auxvec.h
index 6991c4b8ab18..cc61cb9b3e9a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/auxvec.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/auxvec.h
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ 
 #define AT_HWCAP2 26	/* extension of AT_HWCAP */
 #define AT_RSEQ_FEATURE_SIZE	27	/* rseq supported feature size */
 #define AT_RSEQ_ALIGN		28	/* rseq allocation alignment */
+#define AT_HWCAP3 29	/* extension of AT_HWCAP */
+#define AT_HWCAP4 30	/* extension of AT_HWCAP */
 
 #define AT_EXECFN  31	/* filename of program */