Message ID | 20230725180337.2937292-3-jsnow@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | python/machine: use socketpair() for console socket | expand |
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:03:33PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > If everything has gone smoothly, we'll already have closed the socket we > gave to the child during post_launch. The other half of the pair that we > gave to the QMP connection should, likewise, be definitively closed by > now. > > However, in the cleanup path, it's possible we've created the socketpair > but flubbed the launch and need to clean up resources. These resources > *would* be handled by the garbage collector, but that can happen at > unpredictable times. Nicer to just clean them up synchronously on the > exit path, here. > > Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> > --- > python/qemu/machine/machine.py | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py > index 8be0f684fe..26f0fb8a81 100644 > --- a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py > +++ b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py > @@ -395,6 +395,11 @@ def _post_shutdown(self) -> None: > finally: > assert self._qmp_connection is None > > + if self._sock_pair: > + self._sock_pair[0].close() > + self._sock_pair[1].close() > + self._sock_pair = None > + Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> With regards, Daniel
> On 25-Jul-2023, at 11:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:03:33PM -0400, John Snow wrote: >> If everything has gone smoothly, we'll already have closed the socket we >> gave to the child during post_launch. The other half of the pair that we >> gave to the QMP connection should, likewise, be definitively closed by >> now. >> >> However, in the cleanup path, it's possible we've created the socketpair >> but flubbed the launch and need to clean up resources. These resources >> *would* be handled by the garbage collector, but that can happen at >> unpredictable times. Nicer to just clean them up synchronously on the >> exit path, here. >> >> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com> >> --- >> python/qemu/machine/machine.py | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py >> index 8be0f684fe..26f0fb8a81 100644 >> --- a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py >> +++ b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py >> @@ -395,6 +395,11 @@ def _post_shutdown(self) -> None: >> finally: >> assert self._qmp_connection is None >> >> + if self._sock_pair: >> + self._sock_pair[0].close() >> + self._sock_pair[1].close() >> + self._sock_pair = None >> + > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > > With regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| >
diff --git a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py index 8be0f684fe..26f0fb8a81 100644 --- a/python/qemu/machine/machine.py +++ b/python/qemu/machine/machine.py @@ -395,6 +395,11 @@ def _post_shutdown(self) -> None: finally: assert self._qmp_connection is None + if self._sock_pair: + self._sock_pair[0].close() + self._sock_pair[1].close() + self._sock_pair = None + self._close_qemu_log_file() self._load_io_log()
If everything has gone smoothly, we'll already have closed the socket we gave to the child during post_launch. The other half of the pair that we gave to the QMP connection should, likewise, be definitively closed by now. However, in the cleanup path, it's possible we've created the socketpair but flubbed the launch and need to clean up resources. These resources *would* be handled by the garbage collector, but that can happen at unpredictable times. Nicer to just clean them up synchronously on the exit path, here. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> --- python/qemu/machine/machine.py | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)