Message ID | 20230529111337.352990-1-maninder1.s@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] hexagon/traps.c: use KSYM_NAME_LEN in array size | expand |
On Mon 2023-05-29 16:43:36, Maninder Singh wrote: > kallsyms_lookup which in turn calls for kallsyms_lookup_buildid() > writes on index "KSYM_NAME_LEN - 1". > > Thus array size should be KSYM_NAME_LEN. > > for hexagon it was defined as "128" directly. > and commit '61968dbc2d5d' changed define value to 512, > So both were missed to update with new size. > > Fixes: 61968dbc2d5d ("kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512") As mentioned by Michael Ellerman for the 2nd patch, the right upstream commit is: b8a94bfb3395 ("kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512") > Co-developed-by: Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com> With the updated commit hash: Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Best Regards, Petr
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 1:14 PM Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com> wrote: > > kallsyms_lookup which in turn calls for kallsyms_lookup_buildid() > writes on index "KSYM_NAME_LEN - 1". > > Thus array size should be KSYM_NAME_LEN. > > for hexagon it was defined as "128" directly. > and commit '61968dbc2d5d' changed define value to 512, > So both were missed to update with new size. > > Fixes: 61968dbc2d5d ("kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512") > > Co-developed-by: Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com> With the updated commit hash: Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Cheers, Miguel
From: Maninder Singh > Sent: 29 May 2023 12:14 > > kallsyms_lookup which in turn calls for kallsyms_lookup_buildid() > writes on index "KSYM_NAME_LEN - 1". > > Thus array size should be KSYM_NAME_LEN. > > for hexagon it was defined as "128" directly. > and commit '61968dbc2d5d' changed define value to 512, > So both were missed to update with new size. The only safe way to pass a fixed size string is to embed the char[] in a structure and pass the structure address. Pretty much anything else is doomed to be buggy. Whether is it actually sane to require the caller allocate such a large buffer (hi rust) is another matter entirely. David > > Fixes: 61968dbc2d5d ("kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512") > > Co-developed-by: Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com> > --- > arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c b/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c > index 6447763ce5a9..65b30b6ea226 100644 > --- a/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void do_show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *fp, > const char *name = NULL; > unsigned long *newfp; > unsigned long low, high; > - char tmpstr[128]; > + char tmpstr[KSYM_NAME_LEN]; > char *modname; > int i; > > -- > 2.17.1 - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
On Mon, 29 May 2023 16:43:36 +0530, Maninder Singh wrote: > kallsyms_lookup which in turn calls for kallsyms_lookup_buildid() > writes on index "KSYM_NAME_LEN - 1". > > Thus array size should be KSYM_NAME_LEN. > > for hexagon it was defined as "128" directly. > and commit '61968dbc2d5d' changed define value to 512, > So both were missed to update with new size. > > [...] Patch 2 applied to powerpc/fixes. [2/2] powerpc/xmon: use KSYM_NAME_LEN in array size https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/719dfd5925e186e09a2a6f23016936ac436f3d78 cheers
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c b/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c index 6447763ce5a9..65b30b6ea226 100644 --- a/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void do_show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *fp, const char *name = NULL; unsigned long *newfp; unsigned long low, high; - char tmpstr[128]; + char tmpstr[KSYM_NAME_LEN]; char *modname; int i;