diff mbox series

powerpc: Check !irq instead of irq == NO_IRQ and remove NO_IRQ

Message ID 4b8d4f96140af01dec3a3330924dda8b2451c316.1674476798.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit bab537805a10bdbf55b31324ba4a9599e0651e5e
Headers show
Series powerpc: Check !irq instead of irq == NO_IRQ and remove NO_IRQ | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_ppctests success Successfully ran 8 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_selftests success Successfully ran 8 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse success Successfully ran 4 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang success Successfully ran 6 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu success Successfully ran 24 jobs.

Commit Message

Christophe Leroy Jan. 23, 2023, 12:26 p.m. UTC
NO_IRQ is a relic from the old days. It is not used anymore in core
functions. By the way, function irq_of_parse_and_map() returns value 0
on error.

In some drivers, NO_IRQ is erroneously used to check the return of
irq_of_parse_and_map().

It is not a real bug today because the only architectures using the
drivers being fixed by this patch define NO_IRQ as 0, but there are
architectures which define NO_IRQ as -1. If one day those
architectures start using the non fixed drivers, there will be a
problem.

Long time ago Linus advocated for not using NO_IRQ, see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221 . He re-iterated the same view
recently in https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/10/12/622

So test !irq instead of tesing irq == NO_IRQ.

All other usage of NO_IRQ for powerpc were remove in previous cycle
so time has come to remove NO_IRQ completely for powerpc.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h    | 3 ---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/fsp2.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Michael Ellerman Feb. 5, 2023, 12:47 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:26:46 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> NO_IRQ is a relic from the old days. It is not used anymore in core
> functions. By the way, function irq_of_parse_and_map() returns value 0
> on error.
> 
> In some drivers, NO_IRQ is erroneously used to check the return of
> irq_of_parse_and_map().
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] powerpc: Check !irq instead of irq == NO_IRQ and remove NO_IRQ
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/bab537805a10bdbf55b31324ba4a9599e0651e5e

cheers
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
index 5c1516a5ba8f..deadd2149426 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@ 
 
 extern atomic_t ppc_n_lost_interrupts;
 
-/* This number is used when no interrupt has been assigned */
-#define NO_IRQ			(0)
-
 /* Total number of virq in the platform */
 #define NR_IRQS		CONFIG_NR_IRQS
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/fsp2.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/fsp2.c
index e2e4f6d8150d..56d91dbef577 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/fsp2.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/fsp2.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@  static void __init node_irq_request(const char *compat, irq_handler_t errirq_han
 
 	for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, compat) {
 		irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
-		if (irq == NO_IRQ) {
+		if (!irq) {
 			pr_err("device tree node %pOFn is missing a interrupt",
 			      np);
 			of_node_put(np);