diff mbox

powerpc/p3060qds: Fix select of 'MPC8xxx_GPIO'

Message ID 1321141830.20271.22.camel@x61.thuisdomein (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Commit a92282524aee149de0014eef10a0771d1d19821f
Delegated to: Kumar Gala
Headers show

Commit Message

Paul Bolle Nov. 12, 2011, 11:50 p.m. UTC
The driver for the Freescale P3060 QDS got added by commit 96cc017c5b
("[...] Add support for P3060QDS board"). Its Kconfig entry selects
MPC8xxx_GPIO. But at the time that driver got added MPC8xxx_GPIO was
already renamed to GPIO_MPC8XXX, by commit c68308dd50c ("gpio: move
mpc8xxx/512x gpio driver to drivers/gpio").

So make this driver select GPIO_MPC8XXX.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
---
0) Bravely untested: I haven't got the hardware nor the PPC toolchain
needed to build this. And it seems this needs (build) testing anyhow.

1) Sent to the people who wrote the two patches mentioned in the commit
explanation and CC'd the non-authors who signed-off these patches.

2) The config tools do not complain about selects that cannot be met
because they concern a Kconfig symbol that doesn't even exist. Shouldn't
they be made to complain in that case?

 arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Wolfram Sang Nov. 13, 2011, 9:48 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:50:30AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> The driver for the Freescale P3060 QDS got added by commit 96cc017c5b
> ("[...] Add support for P3060QDS board"). Its Kconfig entry selects
> MPC8xxx_GPIO. But at the time that driver got added MPC8xxx_GPIO was
> already renamed to GPIO_MPC8XXX, by commit c68308dd50c ("gpio: move
> mpc8xxx/512x gpio driver to drivers/gpio").
> 
> So make this driver select GPIO_MPC8XXX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>

Thanks for catching this!

> 2) The config tools do not complain about selects that cannot be met
> because they concern a Kconfig symbol that doesn't even exist. Shouldn't
> they be made to complain in that case?

I'd think so.

Regards,

   Wolfram
Kumar Gala Nov. 20, 2011, 3:53 p.m. UTC | #2
On Nov 12, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:

> The driver for the Freescale P3060 QDS got added by commit 96cc017c5b
> ("[...] Add support for P3060QDS board"). Its Kconfig entry selects
> MPC8xxx_GPIO. But at the time that driver got added MPC8xxx_GPIO was
> already renamed to GPIO_MPC8XXX, by commit c68308dd50c ("gpio: move
> mpc8xxx/512x gpio driver to drivers/gpio").
> 
> So make this driver select GPIO_MPC8XXX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> 0) Bravely untested: I haven't got the hardware nor the PPC toolchain
> needed to build this. And it seems this needs (build) testing anyhow.
> 
> 1) Sent to the people who wrote the two patches mentioned in the commit
> explanation and CC'd the non-authors who signed-off these patches.
> 
> 2) The config tools do not complain about selects that cannot be met
> because they concern a Kconfig symbol that doesn't even exist. Shouldn't
> they be made to complain in that case?
> 
> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig |    2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

applied to merge

- k
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
index 45023e2..d7946be 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@  config P3060_QDS
 	select PPC_E500MC
 	select PHYS_64BIT
 	select SWIOTLB
-	select MPC8xxx_GPIO
+	select GPIO_MPC8XXX
 	select HAS_RAPIDIO
 	select PPC_EPAPR_HV_PIC
 	help