Message ID | 20220615120717.3965164-1-windhl@126.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | arch: powerpc: platforms: 85xx: Add missing of_node_put in sgy_cts1000.c | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_selftests | success | Successfully ran 10 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_ppctests | success | Successfully ran 10 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang | success | Successfully ran 7 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse | success | Successfully ran 4 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu | success | Successfully ran 23 jobs. |
Le 15/06/2022 à 14:07, Liang He a écrit : > [You don't often get email from windhl@126.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c > index 98ae64075193..2a45b30852b2 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c > @@ -85,17 +85,24 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* Technically we could just read the first one, but punish > * DT writers for invalid form. */ > if (of_gpio_count(halt_node) != 1) > + { > + of_node_put(halt_node); Duplicating the same code at multiple exit points is bad practice. If you can't do a simple 'return' exit, you should use 'goto' to a common error path exit. > return -EINVAL; > + } > > /* Get the gpio number relative to the dynamic base. */ > gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(halt_node, 0, &flags); > if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) > + { > + of_node_put(halt_node); > return -EINVAL; > + } > > err = gpio_request(gpio, "gpio-halt"); > if (err) { > printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting GPIO %d.\n", > gpio); > + of_node_put(halt_node); > halt_node = NULL; > return err; > } > @@ -112,6 +119,7 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting IRQ %d for " > "GPIO %d.\n", irq, gpio); > gpio_free(gpio); > + of_node_put(halt_node); > halt_node = NULL; > return err; > } > @@ -123,6 +131,8 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > printk(KERN_INFO "gpio-halt: registered GPIO %d (%d trigger, %d" > " irq).\n", gpio, trigger, irq); > > + of_node_put(halt_node); > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.25.1 >
At 2022-06-16 22:49:36, "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote: > > >Le 15/06/2022 à 14:07, Liang He a écrit : >> [You don't often get email from windhl@126.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] >> >> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c >> index 98ae64075193..2a45b30852b2 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c >> @@ -85,17 +85,24 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> /* Technically we could just read the first one, but punish >> * DT writers for invalid form. */ >> if (of_gpio_count(halt_node) != 1) >> + { >> + of_node_put(halt_node); > >Duplicating the same code at multiple exit points is bad practice. > >If you can't do a simple 'return' exit, you should use 'goto' to a >common error path exit. Thanks for your valuable advice, I will resend a new patch for that. > >> return -EINVAL; >> + } >> >> /* Get the gpio number relative to the dynamic base. */ >> gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(halt_node, 0, &flags); >> if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) >> + { >> + of_node_put(halt_node); >> return -EINVAL; >> + } >> >> err = gpio_request(gpio, "gpio-halt"); >> if (err) { >> printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting GPIO %d.\n", >> gpio); >> + of_node_put(halt_node); >> halt_node = NULL; >> return err; >> } >> @@ -112,6 +119,7 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting IRQ %d for " >> "GPIO %d.\n", irq, gpio); >> gpio_free(gpio); >> + of_node_put(halt_node); >> halt_node = NULL; >> return err; >> } >> @@ -123,6 +131,8 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> printk(KERN_INFO "gpio-halt: registered GPIO %d (%d trigger, %d" >> " irq).\n", gpio, trigger, irq); >> >> + of_node_put(halt_node); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c index 98ae64075193..2a45b30852b2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c @@ -85,17 +85,24 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Technically we could just read the first one, but punish * DT writers for invalid form. */ if (of_gpio_count(halt_node) != 1) + { + of_node_put(halt_node); return -EINVAL; + } /* Get the gpio number relative to the dynamic base. */ gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(halt_node, 0, &flags); if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) + { + of_node_put(halt_node); return -EINVAL; + } err = gpio_request(gpio, "gpio-halt"); if (err) { printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting GPIO %d.\n", gpio); + of_node_put(halt_node); halt_node = NULL; return err; } @@ -112,6 +119,7 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting IRQ %d for " "GPIO %d.\n", irq, gpio); gpio_free(gpio); + of_node_put(halt_node); halt_node = NULL; return err; } @@ -123,6 +131,8 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) printk(KERN_INFO "gpio-halt: registered GPIO %d (%d trigger, %d" " irq).\n", gpio, trigger, irq); + of_node_put(halt_node); + return 0; }
Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)