Message ID | 20220313065848.2150-1-rdunlap@infradead.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Christophe Leroy |
Headers | show |
Series | POWERPC: idle: fix return value of __setup handler | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_ppctests | success | Successfully ran 8 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang | success | Successfully ran 7 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_selftests | success | Successfully ran 8 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse | success | Successfully ran 4 jobs. |
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu | success | Successfully ran 24 jobs. |
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> writes: > __setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in > init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled. > A return of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown > kernel parameter and added to init's (limited) argument or environment > strings. Also, error return codes don't mean anything to > obsolete_checksetup() -- only non-zero (usually 1) or zero. > So return 1 from powersave_off(). > > Fixes: 302eca184fb8 ("[POWERPC] cell: use ppc_md->power_save instead of cbe_idle_loop") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > From: Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru> What happened here? Is the patch actually from Igor? If so he should be the author, and it should include his SoB shouldn't it? Same comment for "[PATCH] powerpc/4xx: cpm: fix return value of __setup handler". cheers > Link: lore.kernel.org/r/64644a2f-4a20-bab3-1e15-3b2cdd0defe3@omprussia.ru > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-next-20220310.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c > +++ linux-next-20220310/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int __init powersave_off(char *ar > { > ppc_md.power_save = NULL; > cpuidle_disable = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF; > - return 0; > + return 1; > } > __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off); >
On 5/2/22 06:19, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> writes: >> __setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in >> init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled. >> A return of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown >> kernel parameter and added to init's (limited) argument or environment >> strings. Also, error return codes don't mean anything to >> obsolete_checksetup() -- only non-zero (usually 1) or zero. >> So return 1 from powersave_off(). >> >> Fixes: 302eca184fb8 ("[POWERPC] cell: use ppc_md->power_save instead of cbe_idle_loop") >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >> From: Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru> > > What happened here? Is the patch actually from Igor? If so he should be > the author, and it should include his SoB shouldn't it? I don't know what happened. I did the patches. I'll resend them. Thanks. > Same comment for "[PATCH] powerpc/4xx: cpm: fix return value of __setup handler". > > cheers > >> Link: lore.kernel.org/r/64644a2f-4a20-bab3-1e15-3b2cdd0defe3@omprussia.ru >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> >> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> --- linux-next-20220310.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c >> +++ linux-next-20220310/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c >> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int __init powersave_off(char *ar >> { >> ppc_md.power_save = NULL; >> cpuidle_disable = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF; >> - return 0; >> + return 1; >> } >> __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off); >>
Le 02/05/2022 à 17:50, Randy Dunlap a écrit : > > > On 5/2/22 06:19, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> writes: >>> __setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in >>> init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled. >>> A return of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown >>> kernel parameter and added to init's (limited) argument or environment >>> strings. Also, error return codes don't mean anything to >>> obsolete_checksetup() -- only non-zero (usually 1) or zero. >>> So return 1 from powersave_off(). >>> >>> Fixes: 302eca184fb8 ("[POWERPC] cell: use ppc_md->power_save instead of cbe_idle_loop") >>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>> From: Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru> >> >> What happened here? Is the patch actually from Igor? If so he should be >> the author, and it should include his SoB shouldn't it? > > I don't know what happened. I did the patches. > I'll resend them. > Some erroneous copy/paste from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20220308024228.20477-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/ ? > Thanks. > >> Same comment for "[PATCH] powerpc/4xx: cpm: fix return value of __setup handler". >> >> cheers >> >>> Link: lore.kernel.org/r/64644a2f-4a20-bab3-1e15-3b2cdd0defe3@omprussia.ru >>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> >>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> --- linux-next-20220310.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c >>> +++ linux-next-20220310/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c >>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int __init powersave_off(char *ar >>> { >>> ppc_md.power_save = NULL; >>> cpuidle_disable = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF; >>> - return 0; >>> + return 1; >>> } >>> __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off); >>> >
On 5/2/22 11:45, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 02/05/2022 à 17:50, Randy Dunlap a écrit : >> >> >> On 5/2/22 06:19, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> writes: >>>> __setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in >>>> init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled. >>>> A return of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown >>>> kernel parameter and added to init's (limited) argument or environment >>>> strings. Also, error return codes don't mean anything to >>>> obsolete_checksetup() -- only non-zero (usually 1) or zero. >>>> So return 1 from powersave_off(). >>>> >>>> Fixes: 302eca184fb8 ("[POWERPC] cell: use ppc_md->power_save instead of cbe_idle_loop") >>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>>> From: Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru> >>> >>> What happened here? Is the patch actually from Igor? If so he should be >>> the author, and it should include his SoB shouldn't it? >> >> I don't know what happened. I did the patches. >> I'll resend them. >> > > Some erroneous copy/paste from > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20220308024228.20477-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/ > ? Yes, it should have been Reported-by: > >> Thanks. >> >>> Same comment for "[PATCH] powerpc/4xx: cpm: fix return value of __setup handler". >>> >>> cheers >>> >>>> Link: lore.kernel.org/r/64644a2f-4a20-bab3-1e15-3b2cdd0defe3@omprussia.ru >>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> >>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> >>>> --- >>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> --- linux-next-20220310.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c >>>> +++ linux-next-20220310/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c >>>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int __init powersave_off(char *ar >>>> { >>>> ppc_md.power_save = NULL; >>>> cpuidle_disable = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF; >>>> - return 0; >>>> + return 1; >>>> } >>>> __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off); >>>>
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> writes: > On 5/2/22 06:19, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> writes: >>> __setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in >>> init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled. >>> A return of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown >>> kernel parameter and added to init's (limited) argument or environment >>> strings. Also, error return codes don't mean anything to >>> obsolete_checksetup() -- only non-zero (usually 1) or zero. >>> So return 1 from powersave_off(). >>> >>> Fixes: 302eca184fb8 ("[POWERPC] cell: use ppc_md->power_save instead of cbe_idle_loop") >>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>> From: Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru> >> >> What happened here? Is the patch actually from Igor? If so he should be >> the author, and it should include his SoB shouldn't it? > > I don't know what happened. I did the patches. > I'll resend them. Thanks. cheers
--- linux-next-20220310.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c +++ linux-next-20220310/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int __init powersave_off(char *ar { ppc_md.power_save = NULL; cpuidle_disable = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF; - return 0; + return 1; } __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off);