| Message ID | 20200624075226.92728-7-frankja@linux.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup part 1 | expand |
On 24/06/2020 09.52, Janosch Frank wrote: > This constant enables 64 bit addressing, not the ESAME architecture, > so it shouldn't be named ZMODE. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> > --- > pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h > index 5f36361c02..73852029d4 100644 > --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h > +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ _Static_assert(sizeof(struct PSWLegacy) == 8, "PSWLegacy size incorrect"); > #define PSW_MASK_WAIT 0x0002000000000000ULL > #define PSW_MASK_EAMODE 0x0000000100000000ULL > #define PSW_MASK_BAMODE 0x0000000080000000ULL > -#define PSW_MASK_ZMODE (PSW_MASK_EAMODE | PSW_MASK_BAMODE) > +#define PSW_MASK_64 (PSW_MASK_EAMODE | PSW_MASK_BAMODE) I think you could maybe squash it with the next patch. Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h index 5f36361c02..73852029d4 100644 --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ _Static_assert(sizeof(struct PSWLegacy) == 8, "PSWLegacy size incorrect"); #define PSW_MASK_WAIT 0x0002000000000000ULL #define PSW_MASK_EAMODE 0x0000000100000000ULL #define PSW_MASK_BAMODE 0x0000000080000000ULL -#define PSW_MASK_ZMODE (PSW_MASK_EAMODE | PSW_MASK_BAMODE) +#define PSW_MASK_64 (PSW_MASK_EAMODE | PSW_MASK_BAMODE) /* Low core mapping */ typedef struct LowCore {
This constant enables 64 bit addressing, not the ESAME architecture, so it shouldn't be named ZMODE. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> --- pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)