Message ID | 1544769771-5468-3-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | of: phandle_cache, fix refcounts, remove stale entry | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch | success | next/apply_patch Successfully applied |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64le | warning | build succeeded but added 1 new sparse warning(s) |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64be | warning | build succeeded but added 1 new sparse warning(s) |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64e | warning | build succeeded but added 2 new sparse warning(s) |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-pmac32 | warning | build succeeded but added 2 new sparse warning(s) |
snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 64 lines checked |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> > > Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in > the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle() > will incorrectly find the stale entry. Remove the node from the > cache. > > Add paranoia checks in of_find_node_by_phandle() as a second level > of defense (do not return cached node if detached, do not add node > to cache if detached). > > Reported-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> > --- > drivers/of/base.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/of/dynamic.c | 3 +++ > drivers/of/of_private.h | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c > index d599367cb92a..34a5125713c8 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/base.c > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c > @@ -162,6 +162,27 @@ int of_free_phandle_cache(void) > late_initcall_sync(of_free_phandle_cache); > #endif > > +/* > + * Caller must hold devtree_lock. > + */ > +void __of_free_phandle_cache_entry(phandle handle) > +{ > + phandle masked_handle; > + > + if (!handle) > + return; > + > + masked_handle = handle & phandle_cache_mask; > + > + if (phandle_cache) { > + if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && > + handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) { > + of_node_put(phandle_cache[masked_handle]); > + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; > + } > + } > +} > + > void of_populate_phandle_cache(void) > { > unsigned long flags; > @@ -1209,11 +1230,17 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle) > if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && > handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) > np = phandle_cache[masked_handle]; > + if (np && of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DETACHED)) { > + of_node_put(np); > + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; This should never happen, right? Any time we set OF_DETACHED, the entry should get removed from the cache. I think we want a WARN here in case we're in an unexpected state. Rob
On 12/14/2018 11:20 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> >> >> Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in >> the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle() >> will incorrectly find the stale entry. Remove the node from the >> cache. >> >> Add paranoia checks in of_find_node_by_phandle() as a second level >> of defense (do not return cached node if detached, do not add node >> to cache if detached). >> >> Reported-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> >> --- >> drivers/of/base.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> drivers/of/dynamic.c | 3 +++ >> drivers/of/of_private.h | 4 ++++ >> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c >> index d599367cb92a..34a5125713c8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/of/base.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c >> @@ -162,6 +162,27 @@ int of_free_phandle_cache(void) >> late_initcall_sync(of_free_phandle_cache); >> #endif >> >> +/* >> + * Caller must hold devtree_lock. >> + */ >> +void __of_free_phandle_cache_entry(phandle handle) >> +{ >> + phandle masked_handle; >> + >> + if (!handle) >> + return; >> + >> + masked_handle = handle & phandle_cache_mask; >> + >> + if (phandle_cache) { >> + if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && >> + handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) { >> + of_node_put(phandle_cache[masked_handle]); >> + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> void of_populate_phandle_cache(void) >> { >> unsigned long flags; >> @@ -1209,11 +1230,17 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle) >> if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && >> handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) >> np = phandle_cache[masked_handle]; >> + if (np && of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DETACHED)) { >> + of_node_put(np); >> + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; > > This should never happen, right? Any time we set OF_DETACHED, the > entry should get removed from the cache. I think we want a WARN here > in case we're in an unexpected state. We don't actually remove the pointer from the phandle cache when we set OF_DETACHED in drivers/of/dynamic.c:__of_detach_node. The phandle cache is currently static within drivers/of/base.c. There are a couple of calls to of_populate_phandle_cache / of_free_phandle_cache within drivers/of/overlay.c, but these are not involved in the device tree updates that occur during LPAR migration. A WARN here would only make sense, if we also arrange to clear the handle. > > Rob Michael > >
On 12/14/18 1:56 PM, Michael Bringmann wrote: > On 12/14/2018 11:20 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> >>> >>> Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in >>> the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle() >>> will incorrectly find the stale entry. Remove the node from the >>> cache. >>> >>> Add paranoia checks in of_find_node_by_phandle() as a second level >>> of defense (do not return cached node if detached, do not add node >>> to cache if detached). >>> >>> Reported-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/of/base.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> drivers/of/dynamic.c | 3 +++ >>> drivers/of/of_private.h | 4 ++++ >>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c >>> index d599367cb92a..34a5125713c8 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c >>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c >>> @@ -162,6 +162,27 @@ int of_free_phandle_cache(void) >>> late_initcall_sync(of_free_phandle_cache); >>> #endif >>> >>> +/* >>> + * Caller must hold devtree_lock. >>> + */ >>> +void __of_free_phandle_cache_entry(phandle handle) >>> +{ >>> + phandle masked_handle; >>> + >>> + if (!handle) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + masked_handle = handle & phandle_cache_mask; >>> + >>> + if (phandle_cache) { >>> + if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && >>> + handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) { >>> + of_node_put(phandle_cache[masked_handle]); >>> + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; >>> + } >>> + } >>> +} >>> + >>> void of_populate_phandle_cache(void) >>> { >>> unsigned long flags; >>> @@ -1209,11 +1230,17 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle) >>> if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && >>> handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) >>> np = phandle_cache[masked_handle]; >>> + if (np && of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DETACHED)) { >>> + of_node_put(np); >>> + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; >> >> This should never happen, right? Any time we set OF_DETACHED, the >> entry should get removed from the cache. I think we want a WARN here >> in case we're in an unexpected state. Correct, this should never happen. I will add the WARN. > We don't actually remove the pointer from the phandle cache when we set > OF_DETACHED in drivers/of/dynamic.c:__of_detach_node. The phandle cache > is currently static within drivers/of/base.c. There are a couple of > calls to of_populate_phandle_cache / of_free_phandle_cache within > drivers/of/overlay.c, but these are not involved in the device tree > updates that occur during LPAR migration. A WARN here would only make > sense, if we also arrange to clear the handle. Rob's reply did not include the full patch 2/2. The full patch 2/2 also adds a call to __of_free_phandle_cache_entry() in __of_detach_node(). -Frank > >> >> Rob > > Michael > >> >> >
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c index d599367cb92a..34a5125713c8 100644 --- a/drivers/of/base.c +++ b/drivers/of/base.c @@ -162,6 +162,27 @@ int of_free_phandle_cache(void) late_initcall_sync(of_free_phandle_cache); #endif +/* + * Caller must hold devtree_lock. + */ +void __of_free_phandle_cache_entry(phandle handle) +{ + phandle masked_handle; + + if (!handle) + return; + + masked_handle = handle & phandle_cache_mask; + + if (phandle_cache) { + if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && + handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) { + of_node_put(phandle_cache[masked_handle]); + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; + } + } +} + void of_populate_phandle_cache(void) { unsigned long flags; @@ -1209,11 +1230,17 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle) if (phandle_cache[masked_handle] && handle == phandle_cache[masked_handle]->phandle) np = phandle_cache[masked_handle]; + if (np && of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DETACHED)) { + of_node_put(np); + phandle_cache[masked_handle] = NULL; + np = NULL; + } } if (!np) { for_each_of_allnodes(np) - if (np->phandle == handle) { + if (np->phandle == handle && + !of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DETACHED)) { if (phandle_cache) { /* will put when removed from cache */ of_node_get(np); diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c index f4f8ed9b5454..ecea92f68c87 100644 --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c @@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ void __of_detach_node(struct device_node *np) } of_node_set_flag(np, OF_DETACHED); + + /* race with of_find_node_by_phandle() prevented by devtree_lock */ + __of_free_phandle_cache_entry(np->phandle); } /** diff --git a/drivers/of/of_private.h b/drivers/of/of_private.h index 5d1567025358..24786818e32e 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_private.h +++ b/drivers/of/of_private.h @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ static inline void __of_detach_node_sysfs(struct device_node *np) {} int of_resolve_phandles(struct device_node *tree); #endif +#if defined(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) +void __of_free_phandle_cache_entry(phandle handle); +#endif + #if defined(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) void of_overlay_mutex_lock(void); void of_overlay_mutex_unlock(void);