[v2,3/3] kvm: irqchip: skip update msi when disabled

It's possible that one device kept its irqfd/virq there even when
MSI/MSIX was disabled globally for that device. One example is
virtio-net-pci (see commit f1d0f15a6 and virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask()).
It is used as a fast path to avoid allocate/release irqfd/virq
frequently when guest enables/disables MSIX.

However, this fast path brought a problem to msi_route_list, that the
device MSIRouteEntry is still dangling there even if MSIX disabled -
then we cannot know which message to fetch, even if we can, the messages
are meaningless. In this case, we can just simply ignore this entry.

It's safe, since when MSIX is enabled again, we'll rebuild them no
matter what.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448813

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 target/i386/kvm.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:00:44PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> It's possible that one device kept its irqfd/virq there even when
> MSI/MSIX was disabled globally for that device. One example is
> virtio-net-pci (see commit f1d0f15a6 and virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask()).
> It is used as a fast path to avoid allocate/release irqfd/virq
> frequently when guest enables/disables MSIX.
> 
> However, this fast path brought a problem to msi_route_list, that the
> device MSIRouteEntry is still dangling there even if MSIX disabled -
> then we cannot know which message to fetch, even if we can, the messages
> are meaningless. In this case, we can just simply ignore this entry.
> 
> It's safe, since when MSIX is enabled again, we'll rebuild them no
> matter what.
> 
> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448813
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/kvm.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
> index 55865db..554950d 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #include "standard-headers/asm-x86/hyperv.h"
>  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>  #include "hw/pci/msi.h"
> +#include "hw/pci/msix.h"
>  #include "migration/migration.h"
>  #include "exec/memattrs.h"
>  #include "trace.h"
> @@ -3510,12 +3511,16 @@ static void kvm_update_msi_routes_all(void *private, bool global,
>      int cnt = 0;
>      MSIRouteEntry *entry;
>      MSIMessage msg;
> +    PCIDevice *dev;
> +
>      /* TODO: explicit route update */
>      QLIST_FOREACH(entry, &msi_route_list, list) {
> -        cnt++;

Oops, I think this line should be kept. It does not affect too much,
only the trace below. But still, no reason to remove it.

Paolo, would it still possible to touch it up in your queue?

Sorry for the inconvenience!

> -        msg = pci_get_msi_message(entry->dev, entry->vector);
> -        kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, entry->virq,
> -                                     msg, entry->dev);
> +        dev = entry->dev;
> +        if (!msix_enabled(dev) && !msi_enabled(dev)) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +        msg = pci_get_msi_message(dev, entry->vector);
> +        kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, entry->virq, msg, dev);
>      }
>      kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(kvm_state);
>      trace_kvm_x86_update_msi_routes(cnt);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>

On 11/05/2017 04:56, Peter Xu wrote:
>> @@ -3510,12 +3511,16 @@ static void kvm_update_msi_routes_all(void *private, bool global,
>>      int cnt = 0;
>>      MSIRouteEntry *entry;
>>      MSIMessage msg;
>> +    PCIDevice *dev;
>> +
>>      /* TODO: explicit route update */
>>      QLIST_FOREACH(entry, &msi_route_list, list) {
>> -        cnt++;
> 
> Oops, I think this line should be kept. It does not affect too much,
> only the trace below. But still, no reason to remove it.
> 
> Paolo, would it still possible to touch it up in your queue?

Yup, fixed.

Paolo

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 09:48:52AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/05/2017 04:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> @@ -3510,12 +3511,16 @@ static void kvm_update_msi_routes_all(void *private, bool global,
> >>      int cnt = 0;
> >>      MSIRouteEntry *entry;
> >>      MSIMessage msg;
> >> +    PCIDevice *dev;
> >> +
> >>      /* TODO: explicit route update */
> >>      QLIST_FOREACH(entry, &msi_route_list, list) {
> >> -        cnt++;
> > 
> > Oops, I think this line should be kept. It does not affect too much,
> > only the trace below. But still, no reason to remove it.
> > 
> > Paolo, would it still possible to touch it up in your queue?
> 
> Yup, fixed.

That's great. Thanks!