Message ID | 1486110164-13797-7-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 2017年02月03日 16:22, Peter Xu wrote: > There are lots of places in current intel_iommu.c codes that named > "iova" as "gpa". It is really confusing to use a name "gpa" in these > places (which is very easily to be understood as "Guest Physical > Address", while it's not). To make the codes (much) easier to be read, I > decided to do this once and for all. > > No functional change is made. Only literal ones. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Actually, there's one more left: $git grep gpa hw/i386/intel_iommu.c hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t iova, bool is_write, hw/i386/intel_iommu.c: ret_fr = vtd_gpa_to_slpte(&ce, addr, is_write, &slpte, &level, > --- > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > index 86d19bb..a60b337 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void vtd_update_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id, > uint64_t *key = g_malloc(sizeof(*key)); > uint64_t gfn = vtd_get_iotlb_gfn(addr, level); > > - VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "update iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " gpa 0x%"PRIx64 > + VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "update iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " iova 0x%"PRIx64 > " slpte 0x%"PRIx64 " did 0x%"PRIx16, source_id, addr, slpte, > domain_id); > if (g_hash_table_size(s->iotlb) >= VTD_IOTLB_MAX_SIZE) { > @@ -575,12 +575,12 @@ static uint64_t vtd_get_slpte(dma_addr_t base_addr, uint32_t index) > return slpte; > } > > -/* Given a gpa and the level of paging structure, return the offset of current > - * level. > +/* Given an iova and the level of paging structure, return the offset > + * of current level. > */ > -static inline uint32_t vtd_gpa_level_offset(uint64_t gpa, uint32_t level) > +static inline uint32_t vtd_iova_level_offset(uint64_t iova, uint32_t level) > { > - return (gpa >> vtd_slpt_level_shift(level)) & > + return (iova >> vtd_slpt_level_shift(level)) & > ((1ULL << VTD_SL_LEVEL_BITS) - 1); > } > > @@ -628,10 +628,10 @@ static bool vtd_slpte_nonzero_rsvd(uint64_t slpte, uint32_t level) > } > } > > -/* Given the @gpa, get relevant @slptep. @slpte_level will be the last level > +/* Given the @iova, get relevant @slptep. @slpte_level will be the last level > * of the translation, can be used for deciding the size of large page. > */ > -static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, > +static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t iova, bool is_write, > uint64_t *slptep, uint32_t *slpte_level, > bool *reads, bool *writes) > { > @@ -642,11 +642,11 @@ static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, > uint32_t ce_agaw = vtd_get_agaw_from_context_entry(ce); > uint64_t access_right_check; > > - /* Check if @gpa is above 2^X-1, where X is the minimum of MGAW in CAP_REG > - * and AW in context-entry. > + /* Check if @iova is above 2^X-1, where X is the minimum of MGAW > + * in CAP_REG and AW in context-entry. > */ > - if (gpa & ~((1ULL << MIN(ce_agaw, VTD_MGAW)) - 1)) { > - VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: gpa 0x%"PRIx64 " exceeds limits", gpa); > + if (iova & ~((1ULL << MIN(ce_agaw, VTD_MGAW)) - 1)) { > + VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: iova 0x%"PRIx64 " exceeds limits", iova); > return -VTD_FR_ADDR_BEYOND_MGAW; > } > > @@ -654,13 +654,13 @@ static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, > access_right_check = is_write ? VTD_SL_W : VTD_SL_R; > > while (true) { > - offset = vtd_gpa_level_offset(gpa, level); > + offset = vtd_iova_level_offset(iova, level); > slpte = vtd_get_slpte(addr, offset); > > if (slpte == (uint64_t)-1) { > VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: fail to access second-level paging " > - "entry at level %"PRIu32 " for gpa 0x%"PRIx64, > - level, gpa); > + "entry at level %"PRIu32 " for iova 0x%"PRIx64, > + level, iova); > if (level == vtd_get_level_from_context_entry(ce)) { > /* Invalid programming of context-entry */ > return -VTD_FR_CONTEXT_ENTRY_INV; > @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, > *writes = (*writes) && (slpte & VTD_SL_W); > if (!(slpte & access_right_check)) { > VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: lack of %s permission for " > - "gpa 0x%"PRIx64 " slpte 0x%"PRIx64, > - (is_write ? "write" : "read"), gpa, slpte); > + "iova 0x%"PRIx64 " slpte 0x%"PRIx64, > + (is_write ? "write" : "read"), iova, slpte); > return is_write ? -VTD_FR_WRITE : -VTD_FR_READ; > } > if (vtd_slpte_nonzero_rsvd(slpte, level)) { > @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static void vtd_do_iommu_translate(VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as, PCIBus *bus, > /* Try to fetch slpte form IOTLB */ > iotlb_entry = vtd_lookup_iotlb(s, source_id, addr); > if (iotlb_entry) { > - VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "hit iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " gpa 0x%"PRIx64 > + VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "hit iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " iova 0x%"PRIx64 > " slpte 0x%"PRIx64 " did 0x%"PRIx16, source_id, addr, > iotlb_entry->slpte, iotlb_entry->domain_id); > slpte = iotlb_entry->slpte; > @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry vtd_iommu_translate(MemoryRegion *iommu, hwaddr addr, > is_write, &ret); > VTD_DPRINTF(MMU, > "bus %"PRIu8 " slot %"PRIu8 " func %"PRIu8 " devfn %"PRIu8 > - " gpa 0x%"PRIx64 " hpa 0x%"PRIx64, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus), > + " iova 0x%"PRIx64 " hpa 0x%"PRIx64, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus), > VTD_PCI_SLOT(vtd_as->devfn), VTD_PCI_FUNC(vtd_as->devfn), > vtd_as->devfn, addr, ret.translated_addr); > return ret;
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:27:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017年02月03日 16:22, Peter Xu wrote: > >There are lots of places in current intel_iommu.c codes that named > >"iova" as "gpa". It is really confusing to use a name "gpa" in these > >places (which is very easily to be understood as "Guest Physical > >Address", while it's not). To make the codes (much) easier to be read, I > >decided to do this once and for all. > > > >No functional change is made. Only literal ones. > > > >Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > > Actually, there's one more left: > > $git grep gpa hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, > uint64_t iova, bool is_write, > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c: ret_fr = vtd_gpa_to_slpte(&ce, addr, is_write, > &slpte, &level, Yes, will fix this as well. Thanks, -- peterx
On 2017年02月07日 14:16, Peter Xu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:27:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2017年02月03日 16:22, Peter Xu wrote: >>> There are lots of places in current intel_iommu.c codes that named >>> "iova" as "gpa". It is really confusing to use a name "gpa" in these >>> places (which is very easily to be understood as "Guest Physical >>> Address", while it's not). To make the codes (much) easier to be read, I >>> decided to do this once and for all. >>> >>> No functional change is made. Only literal ones. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> >> Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> >> >> Actually, there's one more left: >> >> $git grep gpa hw/i386/intel_iommu.c >> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, >> uint64_t iova, bool is_write, >> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c: ret_fr = vtd_gpa_to_slpte(&ce, addr, is_write, >> &slpte, &level, > Yes, will fix this as well. Thanks, > > -- peterx You can keep my Reviewed-by with this fixed. Thanks
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c index 86d19bb..a60b337 100644 --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void vtd_update_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id, uint64_t *key = g_malloc(sizeof(*key)); uint64_t gfn = vtd_get_iotlb_gfn(addr, level); - VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "update iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " gpa 0x%"PRIx64 + VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "update iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " iova 0x%"PRIx64 " slpte 0x%"PRIx64 " did 0x%"PRIx16, source_id, addr, slpte, domain_id); if (g_hash_table_size(s->iotlb) >= VTD_IOTLB_MAX_SIZE) { @@ -575,12 +575,12 @@ static uint64_t vtd_get_slpte(dma_addr_t base_addr, uint32_t index) return slpte; } -/* Given a gpa and the level of paging structure, return the offset of current - * level. +/* Given an iova and the level of paging structure, return the offset + * of current level. */ -static inline uint32_t vtd_gpa_level_offset(uint64_t gpa, uint32_t level) +static inline uint32_t vtd_iova_level_offset(uint64_t iova, uint32_t level) { - return (gpa >> vtd_slpt_level_shift(level)) & + return (iova >> vtd_slpt_level_shift(level)) & ((1ULL << VTD_SL_LEVEL_BITS) - 1); } @@ -628,10 +628,10 @@ static bool vtd_slpte_nonzero_rsvd(uint64_t slpte, uint32_t level) } } -/* Given the @gpa, get relevant @slptep. @slpte_level will be the last level +/* Given the @iova, get relevant @slptep. @slpte_level will be the last level * of the translation, can be used for deciding the size of large page. */ -static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, +static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t iova, bool is_write, uint64_t *slptep, uint32_t *slpte_level, bool *reads, bool *writes) { @@ -642,11 +642,11 @@ static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, uint32_t ce_agaw = vtd_get_agaw_from_context_entry(ce); uint64_t access_right_check; - /* Check if @gpa is above 2^X-1, where X is the minimum of MGAW in CAP_REG - * and AW in context-entry. + /* Check if @iova is above 2^X-1, where X is the minimum of MGAW + * in CAP_REG and AW in context-entry. */ - if (gpa & ~((1ULL << MIN(ce_agaw, VTD_MGAW)) - 1)) { - VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: gpa 0x%"PRIx64 " exceeds limits", gpa); + if (iova & ~((1ULL << MIN(ce_agaw, VTD_MGAW)) - 1)) { + VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: iova 0x%"PRIx64 " exceeds limits", iova); return -VTD_FR_ADDR_BEYOND_MGAW; } @@ -654,13 +654,13 @@ static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, access_right_check = is_write ? VTD_SL_W : VTD_SL_R; while (true) { - offset = vtd_gpa_level_offset(gpa, level); + offset = vtd_iova_level_offset(iova, level); slpte = vtd_get_slpte(addr, offset); if (slpte == (uint64_t)-1) { VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: fail to access second-level paging " - "entry at level %"PRIu32 " for gpa 0x%"PRIx64, - level, gpa); + "entry at level %"PRIu32 " for iova 0x%"PRIx64, + level, iova); if (level == vtd_get_level_from_context_entry(ce)) { /* Invalid programming of context-entry */ return -VTD_FR_CONTEXT_ENTRY_INV; @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ static int vtd_gpa_to_slpte(VTDContextEntry *ce, uint64_t gpa, bool is_write, *writes = (*writes) && (slpte & VTD_SL_W); if (!(slpte & access_right_check)) { VTD_DPRINTF(GENERAL, "error: lack of %s permission for " - "gpa 0x%"PRIx64 " slpte 0x%"PRIx64, - (is_write ? "write" : "read"), gpa, slpte); + "iova 0x%"PRIx64 " slpte 0x%"PRIx64, + (is_write ? "write" : "read"), iova, slpte); return is_write ? -VTD_FR_WRITE : -VTD_FR_READ; } if (vtd_slpte_nonzero_rsvd(slpte, level)) { @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static void vtd_do_iommu_translate(VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as, PCIBus *bus, /* Try to fetch slpte form IOTLB */ iotlb_entry = vtd_lookup_iotlb(s, source_id, addr); if (iotlb_entry) { - VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "hit iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " gpa 0x%"PRIx64 + VTD_DPRINTF(CACHE, "hit iotlb sid 0x%"PRIx16 " iova 0x%"PRIx64 " slpte 0x%"PRIx64 " did 0x%"PRIx16, source_id, addr, iotlb_entry->slpte, iotlb_entry->domain_id); slpte = iotlb_entry->slpte; @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry vtd_iommu_translate(MemoryRegion *iommu, hwaddr addr, is_write, &ret); VTD_DPRINTF(MMU, "bus %"PRIu8 " slot %"PRIu8 " func %"PRIu8 " devfn %"PRIu8 - " gpa 0x%"PRIx64 " hpa 0x%"PRIx64, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus), + " iova 0x%"PRIx64 " hpa 0x%"PRIx64, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus), VTD_PCI_SLOT(vtd_as->devfn), VTD_PCI_FUNC(vtd_as->devfn), vtd_as->devfn, addr, ret.translated_addr); return ret;
There are lots of places in current intel_iommu.c codes that named "iova" as "gpa". It is really confusing to use a name "gpa" in these places (which is very easily to be understood as "Guest Physical Address", while it's not). To make the codes (much) easier to be read, I decided to do this once and for all. No functional change is made. Only literal ones. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> --- hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)