From patchwork Wed Jul 31 10:07:48 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ilya Leoshkevich X-Patchwork-Id: 1967007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=o4HoCtRP; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-ppc-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WYnsb27JJz1ybb for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:10:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZ6HZ-000790-Gg; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:10:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZ6HX-00077Y-S9; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:10:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZ6HV-0002hd-B9; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:10:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 46V5ImJj028676; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:10:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=svJzSp8Crzh8vmxDnOECq7w1I/ 9ZCak5NMCdPaEIvi0=; b=o4HoCtRPq3DgG/Mk8T02iS2qEsm8mb887IXno5JpC9 5kupmFpZLTa63A8a4dQWUcL5FvnqbkkGeIz5C7+VpsGXyhbUX6BOpAFmxXz+FlCg a5W6H/+/0IGQgz8lnzmuWNzleGevbGbdK8BW34NJmPPOBrSp5aCdul5ieay8zFnP +l7rQG1yh303LoLsWZNoGPqQgpR9P150uWaJZ+PXqSDQUQw6zBuONW++L/FIXiZI 5glrh2KIiHO0181b0tnO0EiqrzwS8QzN/9G2soTy4JhloZdN82CiUzEtgNbPofwZ t1xoUMdEi7Wqg3fk/aYKilFXpf/1pRNspoMJHKmO9zkQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 40qeqbgpu8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:10:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353728.ppops.net (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 46VAA1Ax005862; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:10:01 GMT Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 40qeqbgpu4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:10:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 46V87sm3029128; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:09:59 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 40nbm0u0ww-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:09:59 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 46VA9tZJ55312814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:09:57 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE55220156; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:09:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F9A20151; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:09:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heavy.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.30.41]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:09:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Nicholas Piggin , Daniel Henrique Barboza , Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Ilya Leoshkevich , qemu-stable@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH] target/ppc: Set ctx->opcode for decode_insn32() Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:07:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20240731100953.14950-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: YdTwHovDHlk7-547ayWPpWWMU9pU-psR X-Proofpoint-GUID: WdyLqamPtTdSkGryCuE_Wb_n6cGbgqsB X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-07-31_07,2024-07-30_01,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=838 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2407110000 definitions=main-2407310073 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=iii@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-ppc-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-ppc-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org divdu (without a dot) sometimes updates cr0, even though it shouldn't. The reason is that gen_op_arith_divd() checks Rc(ctx->opcode), which is not initialized. This field is initialized only for instructions that go through decode_legacy(), and not decodetree. There already was a similar issue fixed in commit 86e6202a57b1 ("target/ppc: Make divw[u] handler method decodetree compatible."). It's not immediately clear what else may access the uninitialized ctx->opcode, so instead of playing whack-a-mole and changing the check to compute_rc0, simply initialize ctx->opcode. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Fixes: 99082815f17f ("target/ppc: Add infrastructure for prefixed insns") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- target/ppc/translate.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c index 71513ba9646..02c810e8848 100644 --- a/target/ppc/translate.c +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c @@ -6426,8 +6426,6 @@ static bool decode_legacy(PowerPCCPU *cpu, DisasContext *ctx, uint32_t insn) opc_handler_t **table, *handler; uint32_t inval; - ctx->opcode = insn; - LOG_DISAS("translate opcode %08x (%02x %02x %02x %02x) (%s)\n", insn, opc1(insn), opc2(insn), opc3(insn), opc4(insn), ctx->le_mode ? "little" : "big"); @@ -6561,6 +6559,7 @@ static void ppc_tr_translate_insn(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs) ctx->base.pc_next = pc += 4; if (!is_prefix_insn(ctx, insn)) { + ctx->opcode = insn; ok = (decode_insn32(ctx, insn) || decode_legacy(cpu, ctx, insn)); } else if ((pc & 63) == 0) {