From patchwork Fri Jul 26 15:07:26 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Hildenbrand X-Patchwork-Id: 1965337 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RZu8Weuq; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WZigRBs2; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WVrkG3wcWz1ybY for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:08:54 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RZu8Weuq; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WZigRBs2; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WVrkG37t0z3cK8 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:08:54 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RZu8Weuq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WZigRBs2; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.133.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WVrjG0Jdhz3dJq for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:08:01 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722006478; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RMo8fPcevHXuY+AOXboYttXTm4mmJMhIiWopBrN6CAw=; b=RZu8Weuqb3hL24oTAFtChz91K+a59RIgiD+eKRjhlmydLUIL0zf+5GUhKPkk0TO+Y3n5eM X/gjjHnBaSX48nvfZk7TnM9BRcE5QW6oOGjXS/AUvHb9jf0BCEpNKsJqxgtREhC91HKodg vsTfOpvf++zXOCvU4Qs/2veMH/0fuYM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722006479; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RMo8fPcevHXuY+AOXboYttXTm4mmJMhIiWopBrN6CAw=; b=WZigRBs2gfqz8RDFpGTnC5E6/D5+O9Y6kUzbiak2CevUmyudNgi37qpQn1KatBtByTWS2M vG7VEldSTUu733E7QHixUvCdanPasW6/JNp7jw3qHDq3Fy7cKxEqX/qfAM80DBFNPToQqY nqT/I5ZMuQFj/IfroMTmklU3T932TGo= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-450-UZOl2F6gMmGTdFJuxLRNgg-1; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:07:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: UZOl2F6gMmGTdFJuxLRNgg-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911FC1956046; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t14s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.153]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70DC71955D4C; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:07:42 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: turn USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS / USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS into Kconfig options Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:07:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20240726150728.3159964-2-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240726150728.3159964-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20240726150728.3159964-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Hildenbrand , Dave Hansen , Peter Xu , linux-mm@kvack.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Boris Ostrovsky , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , Christophe Leroy , Ingo Molnar , "Naveen N. Rao" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Nicholas Piggin , Borislav Petkov , Alexander Viro , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador , Juergen Gross , Christian Brauner , Muchun Song , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Let's clean that up a bit and prepare for depending on CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS in other Kconfig options. More cleanups would be reasonable (like the arch-specific "depends on" for CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS), but we'll leave that for another day. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) Reviewed-by: Qi Zheng Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) --- arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c | 6 +++--- arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 7 ++++--- include/linux/mm.h | 8 ++++---- include/linux/mm_types.h | 2 +- include/linux/mm_types_task.h | 3 --- kernel/fork.c | 4 ++-- mm/Kconfig | 18 +++++++++++------- mm/memory.c | 2 +- 8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c index 2286c2ea60ec4..831793cd6ff94 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int do_adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, return ret; } -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) /* * If we are using split PTE locks, then we need to take the page * lock here. Otherwise we are using shared mm->page_table_lock @@ -80,10 +80,10 @@ static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl) { spin_unlock(ptl); } -#else /* !USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */ +#else /* !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */ static inline void do_pte_lock(spinlock_t *ptl) {} static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl) {} -#endif /* USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */ +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, unsigned long pfn) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c index f1ce39d6d32cb..f4a316894bbb4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static spinlock_t *xen_pte_lock(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm) { spinlock_t *ptl = NULL; -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) ptl = ptlock_ptr(page_ptdesc(page)); spin_lock_nest_lock(ptl, &mm->page_table_lock); #endif @@ -1553,7 +1553,8 @@ static inline void xen_alloc_ptpage(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pfn, __set_pfn_prot(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL_RO); - if (level == PT_PTE && USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && !pinned) + if (level == PT_PTE && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) && + !pinned) __pin_pagetable_pfn(MMUEXT_PIN_L1_TABLE, pfn); xen_mc_issue(XEN_LAZY_MMU); @@ -1581,7 +1582,7 @@ static inline void xen_release_ptpage(unsigned long pfn, unsigned level) if (pinned) { xen_mc_batch(); - if (level == PT_PTE && USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) + if (level == PT_PTE && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS)) __pin_pagetable_pfn(MMUEXT_UNPIN_TABLE, pfn); __set_pfn_prot(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL); diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 0472a5090b180..dff43101572ec 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2843,7 +2843,7 @@ static inline void pagetable_free(struct ptdesc *pt) __free_pages(page, compound_order(page)); } -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) #if ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS void __init ptlock_cache_init(void); bool ptlock_alloc(struct ptdesc *ptdesc); @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ static inline bool ptlock_init(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -#else /* !USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */ +#else /* !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */ /* * We use mm->page_table_lock to guard all pagetable pages of the mm. */ @@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ static inline spinlock_t *pte_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) static inline void ptlock_cache_init(void) {} static inline bool ptlock_init(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { return true; } static inline void ptlock_free(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) {} -#endif /* USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */ +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */ static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { @@ -2966,7 +2966,7 @@ pte_t *pte_offset_map_nolock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, ((unlikely(pmd_none(*(pmd))) && __pte_alloc_kernel(pmd))? \ NULL: pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address)) -#if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS) static inline struct page *pmd_pgtable_page(pmd_t *pmd) { diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h index 4854249792545..165c58b12ccc9 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ struct mm_struct { #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *notifier_subscriptions; #endif -#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS) pgtable_t pmd_huge_pte; /* protected by page_table_lock */ #endif #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h index a2f6179b672b8..bff5706b76e14 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h +++ b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h @@ -16,9 +16,6 @@ #include #endif -#define USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS (NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS) -#define USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS (USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && \ - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK)) #define ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS (SPINLOCK_SIZE > BITS_PER_LONG/8) /* diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index a8362c26ebcb0..216ce9ba4f4e6 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void check_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) pr_alert("BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: %ld\n", mm_pgtables_bytes(mm)); -#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS) VM_BUG_ON_MM(mm->pmd_huge_pte, mm); #endif } @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p, RCU_INIT_POINTER(mm->exe_file, NULL); mmu_notifier_subscriptions_init(mm); init_tlb_flush_pending(mm); -#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS) mm->pmd_huge_pte = NULL; #endif mm_init_uprobes_state(mm); diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig index b72e7d040f789..7b716ac802726 100644 --- a/mm/Kconfig +++ b/mm/Kconfig @@ -585,17 +585,21 @@ config ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE # at the same time (e.g. copy_page_range()). # DEBUG_SPINLOCK and DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC spinlock_t also enlarge struct page. # -config SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS - int - default "999999" if !MMU - default "999999" if ARM && !CPU_CACHE_VIPT - default "999999" if PARISC && !PA20 - default "999999" if SPARC32 - default "4" +config SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS + def_bool y + depends on MMU + depends on NR_CPUS >= 4 + depends on !ARM || CPU_CACHE_VIPT + depends on !PARISC || PA20 + depends on !SPARC32 config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK bool +config SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS + def_bool y + depends on SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK + # # support for memory balloon config MEMORY_BALLOON diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 833d2cad6eb29..714589582fe15 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -6559,7 +6559,7 @@ long copy_folio_from_user(struct folio *dst_folio, } #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || CONFIG_HUGETLBFS */ -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) && ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS static struct kmem_cache *page_ptl_cachep; From patchwork Fri Jul 26 15:07:27 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Hildenbrand X-Patchwork-Id: 1965338 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dcbMn3V+; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dcbMn3V+; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WVrlC4Z6Yz1ybY for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:09:42 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dcbMn3V+; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dcbMn3V+; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WVrlB0rxzz3dSZ for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:09:42 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dcbMn3V+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dcbMn3V+; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WVrjV3R83z3dRP for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:08:14 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722006491; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gclXSPT2RuzrPlofvNqS2CiD4N2Pif5SxTyxuMydzCs=; b=dcbMn3V+8xYsyTMtn1Fj5r7rxzDSm5wwOI4KPzhDT8Cup9Hc/n1+Kk8fllGmIVw++Bx1Mf R42PamghhVnWxkgr0x2B3oIU/oduW3gZNcgxNDt1bbzI+25eY8DMav+YPgSoSP7GakXwG9 vkBYpbq+dO6ShVige3BweO6Z+mNinAc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722006491; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gclXSPT2RuzrPlofvNqS2CiD4N2Pif5SxTyxuMydzCs=; b=dcbMn3V+8xYsyTMtn1Fj5r7rxzDSm5wwOI4KPzhDT8Cup9Hc/n1+Kk8fllGmIVw++Bx1Mf R42PamghhVnWxkgr0x2B3oIU/oduW3gZNcgxNDt1bbzI+25eY8DMav+YPgSoSP7GakXwG9 vkBYpbq+dO6ShVige3BweO6Z+mNinAc= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-481-CIqENtZwNcGlPB5wTz9pqg-1; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:08:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CIqENtZwNcGlPB5wTz9pqg-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336DD1955D50; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t14s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.153]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50641955D45; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:07:50 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] mm/hugetlb: enforce that PMD PT sharing has split PMD PT locks Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:07:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20240726150728.3159964-3-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240726150728.3159964-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20240726150728.3159964-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Hildenbrand , Dave Hansen , Peter Xu , linux-mm@kvack.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Boris Ostrovsky , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , Christophe Leroy , Ingo Molnar , "Naveen N. Rao" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Nicholas Piggin , Borislav Petkov , Alexander Viro , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador , Juergen Gross , Christian Brauner , Muchun Song , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Sharing page tables between processes but falling back to per-MM page table locks cannot possibly work. So, let's make sure that we do have split PMD locks by adding a new Kconfig option and letting that depend on CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) --- fs/Kconfig | 4 ++++ include/linux/hugetlb.h | 5 ++--- mm/hugetlb.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index a46b0cbc4d8f6..0e4efec1d92e6 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -288,6 +288,10 @@ config HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP depends on ARCH_WANT_OPTIMIZE_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP depends on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP +config HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING + def_bool HUGETLB_PAGE + depends on ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE && SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS + config ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE bool diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h index da800e56fe590..4d2f3224ff027 100644 --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h @@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static inline __init void hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order) } #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING static inline bool hugetlb_pmd_shared(pte_t *pte) { return page_count(virt_to_page(pte)) > 1; @@ -1279,8 +1279,7 @@ bool __vma_private_lock(struct vm_area_struct *vma); static inline pte_t * hugetlb_walk(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz) { -#if defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) && \ - defined(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE) && defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) +#if defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING) && defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) struct hugetlb_vma_lock *vma_lock = vma->vm_private_data; /* diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 0858a18272073..c4d94e122c41f 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -7211,7 +7211,7 @@ long hugetlb_unreserve_pages(struct inode *inode, long start, long end, return 0; } -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING static unsigned long page_table_shareable(struct vm_area_struct *svma, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pgoff_t idx) @@ -7373,7 +7373,7 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, return 1; } -#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE */ +#else /* !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING */ pte_t *huge_pmd_share(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pud_t *pud) @@ -7396,7 +7396,7 @@ bool want_pmd_share(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) { return false; } -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE */ +#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING */ #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, @@ -7494,7 +7494,7 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) /* See description above. Architectures can provide their own version. */ __weak unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h) { -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING if (huge_page_size(h) == PMD_SIZE) return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; #endif From patchwork Fri Jul 26 15:07:28 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Hildenbrand X-Patchwork-Id: 1965339 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ch9Q6v//; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ch9Q6v//; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WVrm06XMGz1yY5 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:10:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ch9Q6v//; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ch9Q6v//; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WVrm03SZXz3dK6 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:10:24 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ch9Q6v//; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ch9Q6v//; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.133.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WVrjd5xmDz3dSW for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:08:21 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722006498; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h2hZ5iaP0GGncGDVruB29gu4r9/BL7FMsu+FThy8pbQ=; b=Ch9Q6v//DDxHdznw+1h+enlnwrSWKrT5pamFq1cTqJ6UJmnXpiwGS02qFTeBaS3mzBwAoE rO5geQcc6sT1ULGaJoYITu4nkZ8l9kjJT6kOjojQmKqS6LnQrIf4mriATzuqeXdAPWKhhh PGnLLiNXonjdRHLrhyKra/4khZHJvJQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722006498; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h2hZ5iaP0GGncGDVruB29gu4r9/BL7FMsu+FThy8pbQ=; b=Ch9Q6v//DDxHdznw+1h+enlnwrSWKrT5pamFq1cTqJ6UJmnXpiwGS02qFTeBaS3mzBwAoE rO5geQcc6sT1ULGaJoYITu4nkZ8l9kjJT6kOjojQmKqS6LnQrIf4mriATzuqeXdAPWKhhh PGnLLiNXonjdRHLrhyKra/4khZHJvJQ= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-672-HOHS8bHhPF-HxdWbNQ7urA-1; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:08:13 -0400 X-MC-Unique: HOHS8bHhPF-HxdWbNQ7urA-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD891955BF7; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t14s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.153]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2841955D48; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:08:00 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] powerpc/8xx: document and enforce that split PT locks are not used Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:07:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20240726150728.3159964-4-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240726150728.3159964-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20240726150728.3159964-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Hildenbrand , Dave Hansen , Peter Xu , linux-mm@kvack.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Boris Ostrovsky , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , Christophe Leroy , Ingo Molnar , "Naveen N. Rao" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Nicholas Piggin , Borislav Petkov , Alexander Viro , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador , Juergen Gross , Christian Brauner , Muchun Song , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Right now, we cannot have split PT locks because 8xx does not support SMP. But for the sake of documentation *why* 8xx is fine regarding what we documented in huge_pte_lockptr(), let's just add code to enforce it at the same time as documenting it. This should also make everybody who wants to copy from the 8xx approach of supporting such unusual ways of mapping hugetlb folios aware that it gets tricky once multiple page tables are involved. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c index ab0656115424f..7316396e452d8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c @@ -297,6 +297,12 @@ int huge_ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, } #if defined(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) + +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) || defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS) +/* We need the same lock to protect the PMD table and the two PTE tables. */ +#error "8M hugetlb folios are incompatible with split page table locks" +#endif + static void __set_huge_pte_at(pmd_t *pmd, pte_t *ptep, pte_basic_t val) { pte_basic_t *entry = (pte_basic_t *)ptep;