From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:17 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913518 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=gj22=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1692-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV305mRBz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV305Jkmz4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV305FVZz4wck; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:16 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=147.75.80.249; helo=am.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1692-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.80.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV300gK0z4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8A81F22E9D for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA087FBBD; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7AA27F7EF; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847939; cv=none; b=InQXAxysbe1iBdhnOaVX1NdMgX6g122G/ZtN3wrx+5KZLzxomTpNHXq/V2VMkDmwMlBIrcqC6wz/edIeU1Cli02MWFXhV9MuG2f9A+ohPI5hh7qYcPBH4QQ7144kmm4MWavcpjUENFbFfUty+BialdW2JpfbJbLit2qX3d659Ts= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847939; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8AM8pym/lLuefOMlDqaQegYdsko79Al05Npk0vTE81Q=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HAhKALGKQK+tKl3aNEwsC987FiL+2FzzVvlyOoxby0XFlgK3wrmPltesXobAh5nwqrWiol2W8nVreneQ89vYJ0hac+3KmatJNk5Vh4rvqLyLUHTC8Ca/E7V1gM51D/WBTkTBX33OwW7RJSeZySaAUPBVNIJGowTWuBmQL5x7V98= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.194]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTyp2qlbzwPlY; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:29:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091E7140336; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:09 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 1/9] ext4: avoid overflow when setting values via sysfs Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:17 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-2-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) When setting values of type unsigned int through sysfs, we use kstrtoul() to parse it and then truncate part of it as the final set value, when the set value is greater than UINT_MAX, the set value will not match what we see because of the truncation. As follows: $ echo 4294967296 > /sys/fs/ext4/sda/mb_max_linear_groups $ cat /sys/fs/ext4/sda/mb_max_linear_groups 0 So we use kstrtouint() to parse the attr_pointer_ui type to avoid the inconsistency described above. In addition, a judgment is added to avoid setting s_resv_clusters less than 0. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index 6d332dff79dd..ca820620b974 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static ssize_t reserved_clusters_store(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, int ret; ret = kstrtoull(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &val); - if (ret || val >= clusters) + if (ret || val >= clusters || (s64)val < 0) return -EINVAL; atomic64_set(&sbi->s_resv_clusters, val); @@ -451,7 +451,8 @@ static ssize_t ext4_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, s_kobj); struct ext4_attr *a = container_of(attr, struct ext4_attr, attr); void *ptr = calc_ptr(a, sbi); - unsigned long t; + unsigned int t; + unsigned long lt; int ret; switch (a->attr_id) { @@ -460,7 +461,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, case attr_pointer_ui: if (!ptr) return 0; - ret = kstrtoul(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); + ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); if (ret) return ret; if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) @@ -471,10 +472,10 @@ static ssize_t ext4_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, case attr_pointer_ul: if (!ptr) return 0; - ret = kstrtoul(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); + ret = kstrtoul(skip_spaces(buf), 0, <); if (ret) return ret; - *((unsigned long *) ptr) = t; + *((unsigned long *) ptr) = lt; return len; case attr_inode_readahead: return inode_readahead_blks_store(sbi, buf, len); From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:18 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913514 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=xz5c=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1688-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV2040cvz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV2010Mcz4wck for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV200cC6z4wcg; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:24 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=147.75.80.249; helo=am.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1688-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.80.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV1y5VbVz4wc1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:22 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771361F22EB4 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595307EF07; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46BD07EEF0; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847935; cv=none; b=gJMkdaE87AZbUbHsrRRYoCBmfE9q9GCXJLjTIK8fY5bQWbVPIhf6y3mKRlaC4c46LGNqXlLv0QmHYOgXmxQa3GAJmSSdOd0BFN9oSxFJZPEWeeta3WTSsFZMTL2jy+VVY0mnjna4ptSRoHQw9RkAbe+pEcTbbm75lXLYTSEtR+c= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847935; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OZpA7WL4wKhc3TzlPCYeSrdk8I55QEYuvT1JrMm4KGA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=m5SVm2nSAWepGRjrf2cLR72Fy6PZ3gouxx656M+SelCqsjVJZfZVmWq9ixWUl51Tc6ZTXR+3j6qcotRknyxqOuMaQfGJbmPThRW7inH8evRbY6hx9rhdmug6JkIW1JNjCUGYIZcTYNLTaJLN8//a5n6iOghNUCWEck51V4pR/Dk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.48]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTzZ2N7vzNm28; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:30:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919EC18005D; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:09 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 2/9] ext4: refactor out ext4_generic_attr_store() Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:18 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-3-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) Refactor out the function ext4_generic_attr_store() to handle the setting of values of various common types, with no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index ca820620b974..2b1c529b7fdf 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -443,24 +443,20 @@ static ssize_t ext4_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj, return 0; } -static ssize_t ext4_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, - struct attribute *attr, - const char *buf, size_t len) +static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, + const char *buf, size_t len) { - struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = container_of(kobj, struct ext4_sb_info, - s_kobj); - struct ext4_attr *a = container_of(attr, struct ext4_attr, attr); - void *ptr = calc_ptr(a, sbi); + int ret; unsigned int t; unsigned long lt; - int ret; + void *ptr = calc_ptr(a, sbi); + + if (!ptr) + return 0; switch (a->attr_id) { - case attr_reserved_clusters: - return reserved_clusters_store(sbi, buf, len); case attr_pointer_ui: - if (!ptr) - return 0; ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); if (ret) return ret; @@ -470,19 +466,33 @@ static ssize_t ext4_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, *((unsigned int *) ptr) = t; return len; case attr_pointer_ul: - if (!ptr) - return 0; ret = kstrtoul(skip_spaces(buf), 0, <); if (ret) return ret; *((unsigned long *) ptr) = lt; return len; + } + return 0; +} + +static ssize_t ext4_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, + struct attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t len) +{ + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = container_of(kobj, struct ext4_sb_info, + s_kobj); + struct ext4_attr *a = container_of(attr, struct ext4_attr, attr); + + switch (a->attr_id) { + case attr_reserved_clusters: + return reserved_clusters_store(sbi, buf, len); case attr_inode_readahead: return inode_readahead_blks_store(sbi, buf, len); case attr_trigger_test_error: return trigger_test_error(sbi, buf, len); + default: + return ext4_generic_attr_store(a, sbi, buf, len); } - return 0; } static void ext4_sb_release(struct kobject *kobj) From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:19 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913515 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=sjvu=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1689-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV284tqZz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV263fk7z4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:30 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV263Zpqz4wck; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:30 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; helo=am.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1689-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV256386z4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:32:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D681F22F9F for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEC07F466; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 078E07EEED; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847935; cv=none; b=PYTxFcRH3n+M2ZSKYOcwPO0QEUWH3kzgsRLA1d/3g9n33KKOTOX+lR64OSYGuifFis/JVJPOrd0IY2+euqh0pfD2ZF0nTfRl//JLbGKxISVtQbzoI6OOY2jUwugorawMwGcWlk3x2Z/8MRAJPXmTt+qSu2UuTjWhhiLGwSuuiRw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847935; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GQePeHmLBXBOXIAO3Kr28EekfNyWO9K0IjzdXcsDa/c=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EmgxuoQrG377B9zC/6UUnUEOK/HAcdWzUz/GsjGVNB9qjwq9mLJMpe3OSF058iLWIUFyLRT3grykxrMR0TebGQTMhc0C0qa+afw9WLxwhpBwOV/eGxuIqgqDeJgwFigHvEsreKIA90IEz1iceu2jyHiO1G9GkQKzTj7+9Wyts1k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.194]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTzZ6562zNm4P; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:30:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F485140336; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:10 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 3/9] ext4: refactor out ext4_generic_attr_show() Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:19 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-4-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) Refactor out the function ext4_generic_attr_show() to handle the reading of values of various common types, with no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index 2b1c529b7fdf..7f455b5f22c0 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -366,13 +366,42 @@ static ssize_t __print_tstamp(char *buf, __le32 lo, __u8 hi) #define print_tstamp(buf, es, tstamp) \ __print_tstamp(buf, (es)->tstamp, (es)->tstamp ## _hi) +static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a, + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, char *buf) +{ + void *ptr = calc_ptr(a, sbi); + + if (!ptr) + return 0; + + switch (a->attr_id) { + case attr_inode_readahead: + case attr_pointer_ui: + if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", le32_to_cpup(ptr)); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", *((unsigned int *) ptr)); + case attr_pointer_ul: + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%lu\n", *((unsigned long *) ptr)); + case attr_pointer_u8: + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", *((unsigned char *) ptr)); + case attr_pointer_u64: + if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", le64_to_cpup(ptr)); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", *((unsigned long long *) ptr)); + case attr_pointer_string: + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%.*s\n", a->attr_size, (char *) ptr); + case attr_pointer_atomic: + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", atomic_read((atomic_t *) ptr)); + } + return 0; +} + static ssize_t ext4_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = container_of(kobj, struct ext4_sb_info, s_kobj); struct ext4_attr *a = container_of(attr, struct ext4_attr, attr); - void *ptr = calc_ptr(a, sbi); switch (a->attr_id) { case attr_delayed_allocation_blocks: @@ -391,45 +420,6 @@ static ssize_t ext4_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj, return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", (unsigned long long) percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_sra_exceeded_retry_limit)); - case attr_inode_readahead: - case attr_pointer_ui: - if (!ptr) - return 0; - if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", - le32_to_cpup(ptr)); - else - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", - *((unsigned int *) ptr)); - case attr_pointer_ul: - if (!ptr) - return 0; - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%lu\n", - *((unsigned long *) ptr)); - case attr_pointer_u8: - if (!ptr) - return 0; - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", - *((unsigned char *) ptr)); - case attr_pointer_u64: - if (!ptr) - return 0; - if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", - le64_to_cpup(ptr)); - else - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", - *((unsigned long long *) ptr)); - case attr_pointer_string: - if (!ptr) - return 0; - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%.*s\n", a->attr_size, - (char *) ptr); - case attr_pointer_atomic: - if (!ptr) - return 0; - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", - atomic_read((atomic_t *) ptr)); case attr_feature: return sysfs_emit(buf, "supported\n"); case attr_first_error_time: @@ -438,9 +428,9 @@ static ssize_t ext4_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj, return print_tstamp(buf, sbi->s_es, s_last_error_time); case attr_journal_task: return journal_task_show(sbi, buf); + default: + return ext4_generic_attr_show(a, sbi, buf); } - - return 0; } static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:20 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913522 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=fvcy=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1696-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3m2Nrpz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV3m1wjpz4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV3m1sqrz4wc1; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:56 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; helo=ny.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1696-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3l5mffz4wck for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:55 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20EE1C21D4C for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C713280611; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B21207FBB7; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847943; cv=none; b=tY//35FP4DNxDkd3HLrMbd5IZ+zQDXYVNyEUNKF3WhFMNBfa23Pq3ospQhd2xxKue+xXoZchQ+R8LJ5yw5LNRDO8OvJe6RB1+U9NRFmlEch/lS/ppLv99k3vnQML1SYNy2e7euzOz4SkPoGqWplOQa2EIFRBFzVz2LPnr7aAGOE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847943; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7ZenRpVmVeefzkxE5af4mBcDQV5/Oz/F+K8tVbtSbzc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y0eAnhyfSSV06OIwLhReh4DplSEhgsWnCqC/zbNRk3H2HgdLemGJhGAB7MOx0ckVkdG1lYxrobNsbj5ZV6/4e91XiK7+O1WMR+0EiQbie16ahEEuf50eq4uklOvkPlUn8fyvZvRydWkX65bW7fJrskFIaRtRxSdBiXFko6P3C/Y= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.35 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTyp5lJdz1R7L6; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:29:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B23E61A0187; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:11 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 4/9] ext4: fix slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists() Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:20 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-5-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) We can trigger a slab-out-of-bounds with the following commands: mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/$disk 10G mount /dev/$disk /tmp/test echo 2147483647 > /sys/fs/ext4/$disk/mb_group_prealloc echo test > /tmp/test/file && sync ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888121b9d0f0 by task kworker/u2:0/11 CPU: 0 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Tainted: GL 6.7.0-next-20240118 #521 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x2c/0x50 kasan_report+0xb6/0xf0 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists+0x8a/0x200 [ext4] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x19e9/0x2370 [ext4] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x88a/0x1370 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x14f7/0x2390 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x569/0xea0 [ext4] ext4_do_writepages+0x10f6/0x1bc0 [ext4] [...] ================================================================== The flow of issue triggering is as follows: // Set s_mb_group_prealloc to 2147483647 via sysfs ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request ext4_mb_normalize_group_request ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_group_prealloc ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_choose_next_group ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail mb_avg_fragment_size_order order = fls(len) - 2 = 29 ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists frag_list = &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[order] if (list_empty(frag_list)) // Trigger SOOB! At 4k block size, the length of the s_mb_avg_fragment_size list is 14, but an oversized s_mb_group_prealloc is set, causing slab-out-of-bounds to be triggered by an attempt to access an element at index 29. Add a new attr_id attr_clusters_in_group with values in the range [0, sbi->s_clusters_per_group] and declare mb_group_prealloc as that type to fix the issue. In addition avoid returning an order from mb_avg_fragment_size_order() greater than MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) and reduce some useless loops. Fixes: 7e170922f06b ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ++++ fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 12b3f196010b..dbf04f91516c 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -831,6 +831,8 @@ static int mb_avg_fragment_size_order(struct super_block *sb, ext4_grpblk_t len) return 0; if (order == MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)) order--; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb))) + order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; return order; } @@ -1008,6 +1010,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(struct ext4_allocation_context * goal length. */ order = fls(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len) - 1; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order - 1 > MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb))) + order = MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb); min_order = order - sbi->s_mb_best_avail_max_trim_order; if (min_order < 0) min_order = 0; diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index 7f455b5f22c0..ddd71673176c 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ typedef enum { attr_trigger_test_error, attr_first_error_time, attr_last_error_time, + attr_clusters_in_group, attr_feature, attr_pointer_ui, attr_pointer_ul, @@ -207,13 +208,14 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FUNC(sra_exceeded_retry_limit, 0444); EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, 0644, inode_readahead, ext4_sb_info, s_inode_readahead_blks); +EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_group_prealloc, 0644, clusters_in_group, + ext4_sb_info, s_mb_group_prealloc); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(inode_goal, s_inode_goal); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stats, s_mb_stats); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_to_scan, s_mb_max_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_min_to_scan, s_mb_min_to_scan); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_order2_req, s_mb_order2_reqs); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stream_req, s_mb_stream_request); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_group_prealloc, s_mb_group_prealloc); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_linear_groups, s_mb_max_linear_groups); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(extent_max_zeroout_kb, s_extent_max_zeroout_kb); EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, 0200, trigger_test_error); @@ -376,6 +378,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a, switch (a->attr_id) { case attr_inode_readahead: + case attr_clusters_in_group: case attr_pointer_ui: if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", le32_to_cpup(ptr)); @@ -455,6 +458,14 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, else *((unsigned int *) ptr) = t; return len; + case attr_clusters_in_group: + ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (t > sbi->s_clusters_per_group) + return -EINVAL; + *((unsigned int *) ptr) = t; + return len; case attr_pointer_ul: ret = kstrtoul(skip_spaces(buf), 0, <); if (ret) From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:21 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913519 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=see5=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1693-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3K71zKz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV3K5Dzkz4wc1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV3K5B2Hz4wcg; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:33 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; helo=sv.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1693-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3K2w20z4wc1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2253528260A for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9C980031; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 708437FBDA; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847942; cv=none; b=aIr5HVP4tb/ynGrovYQ5+uOmcWlz/Ri2MKTlZS6EzN67iM4ehOawjgYSSpuKvOVhbwu4L0ANe0MiiByi0zV/2R0Jm+8m3I6656Cg3qqBMVZYYNnqhMtPcPVp090OvDfV7SsmY2Juy6MUKazwHMxjDqpW8TP+9E3Ftd7hvluoZN0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847942; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PG8dxu2wmb6J4SvE44TEF7QKq15BiMIinNoTBc5u7gI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AclWtG8ipTC0n4SFSkQ5DpuMwvfonNxl34GqsfiU3y6ydOO38h8rHXE1cl72FLGNbF6nFn1D2Lxw2+3KOgsvTSRgRIwhDUYNJkyI6O8dYRxP1vGZUxpUcPGK9H0JlHAiEu5dkvPYdbzg7/xvJ2YDTEjsEZSaL04tC+lik3Flpew= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.254]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTz92F1jztQb4; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:29:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B3B18007B; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:11 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 5/9] ext4: add new attr pointer attr_mb_order Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:21 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-6-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) The s_mb_best_avail_max_trim_order is of type unsigned int, and has a range of values well beyond the normal use of the mb_order. Although the mballoc code is careful enough that large numbers don't matter there, but this can mislead the sysadmin into thinking that it's normal to set such values. Hence add a new attr_id attr_mb_order with values in the range [0, 64] to avoid storing garbage values and make us more resilient to surprises in the future. Suggested-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index ddd71673176c..8e0473169458 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ typedef enum { attr_first_error_time, attr_last_error_time, attr_clusters_in_group, + attr_mb_order, attr_feature, attr_pointer_ui, attr_pointer_ul, @@ -210,6 +211,8 @@ EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, 0644, inode_readahead, ext4_sb_info, s_inode_readahead_blks); EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_group_prealloc, 0644, clusters_in_group, ext4_sb_info, s_mb_group_prealloc); +EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_best_avail_max_trim_order, 0644, mb_order, + ext4_sb_info, s_mb_best_avail_max_trim_order); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(inode_goal, s_inode_goal); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stats, s_mb_stats); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_to_scan, s_mb_max_to_scan); @@ -225,7 +228,6 @@ EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_warning_ratelimit_state.int EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_burst, s_warning_ratelimit_state.burst); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_msg_ratelimit_state.interval); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_burst, s_msg_ratelimit_state.burst); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_best_avail_max_trim_order, s_mb_best_avail_max_trim_order); #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UL(simulate_fail, s_simulate_fail); #endif @@ -379,6 +381,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a, switch (a->attr_id) { case attr_inode_readahead: case attr_clusters_in_group: + case attr_mb_order: case attr_pointer_ui: if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", le32_to_cpup(ptr)); @@ -458,6 +461,14 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, else *((unsigned int *) ptr) = t; return len; + case attr_mb_order: + ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (t > 64) + return -EINVAL; + *((unsigned int *) ptr) = t; + return len; case attr_clusters_in_group: ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); if (ret) From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:22 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913523 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=wjur=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1697-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV4J6HVnz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV4J5q5Dz4wc1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV4J5lyzz4wcg; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:24 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; helo=sy.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1697-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV4J5fF8z4wc1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88430B222A4 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD19580C0D; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A92FC80021; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847944; cv=none; b=eBCCpOnN0lh6Hjj20h3lMIwd7B+ACqJRrB0plGLTc3Ug8XSLZ/88VtGTlnlGcYqTPXDoy+2LROlZrywYb08/5tdsxYjWEznAU/WeSCWl8N+kFOWuuhwTXpsn+Id1mRH16hEVO5NO98yKH3Uearv4NJrnNJrjaNDij9DsVvhvbE4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vETwVB3GhASM8vuvsTXrKuIYeexJx5Wkt0p0/Qi0PHg=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ml2otGIBrGhIsykBN17/UzGnZNQkfCR1W4sxpe41chH3wJRwibXcomx8yo4di9zDUKHS1iHojy3dQlFE6LzHJPJjh2+i+25CO0KbHJ9JF/nJMFth6bfqVMtL4g9B6yo9Bj2UV5UhYrVMPNA0/pGLRFe9rNhxHEL55idw4O3JTt8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzV0t6s92z1vx4D; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:31:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAEDD1A0172; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:12 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 6/9] ext4: add positive int attr pointer to avoid sysfs variables overflow Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:22 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-7-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) The following variables controlled by the sysfs interface are of type int and are normally used in the range [0, INT_MAX], but are declared as attr_pointer_ui, and thus may be set to values that exceed INT_MAX and result in overflows to get negative values. err_ratelimit_burst msg_ratelimit_burst warning_ratelimit_burst err_ratelimit_interval_ms msg_ratelimit_interval_ms warning_ratelimit_interval_ms Therefore, we add attr_pointer_pi (aka positive int attr pointer) with a value range of 0-INT_MAX to avoid overflow. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c index 8e0473169458..ddb54608ca2e 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ typedef enum { attr_clusters_in_group, attr_mb_order, attr_feature, + attr_pointer_pi, attr_pointer_ui, attr_pointer_ul, attr_pointer_u64, @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ static struct ext4_attr ext4_attr_##_name = { \ #define EXT4_RO_ATTR_ES_STRING(_name,_elname,_size) \ EXT4_ATTR_STRING(_name, 0444, _size, ext4_super_block, _elname) +#define EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(_name,_elname) \ + EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(_name, 0644, pointer_pi, ext4_sb_info, _elname) + #define EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(_name,_elname) \ EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(_name, 0644, pointer_ui, ext4_sb_info, _elname) @@ -222,12 +226,12 @@ EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stream_req, s_mb_stream_request); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_linear_groups, s_mb_max_linear_groups); EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(extent_max_zeroout_kb, s_extent_max_zeroout_kb); EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, 0200, trigger_test_error); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(err_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_err_ratelimit_state.interval); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(err_ratelimit_burst, s_err_ratelimit_state.burst); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_warning_ratelimit_state.interval); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_burst, s_warning_ratelimit_state.burst); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_msg_ratelimit_state.interval); -EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_burst, s_msg_ratelimit_state.burst); +EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(err_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_err_ratelimit_state.interval); +EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(err_ratelimit_burst, s_err_ratelimit_state.burst); +EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(warning_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_warning_ratelimit_state.interval); +EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(warning_ratelimit_burst, s_warning_ratelimit_state.burst); +EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(msg_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_msg_ratelimit_state.interval); +EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_PI(msg_ratelimit_burst, s_msg_ratelimit_state.burst); #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UL(simulate_fail, s_simulate_fail); #endif @@ -382,6 +386,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a, case attr_inode_readahead: case attr_clusters_in_group: case attr_mb_order: + case attr_pointer_pi: case attr_pointer_ui: if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset) return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", le32_to_cpup(ptr)); @@ -452,6 +457,14 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a, return 0; switch (a->attr_id) { + case attr_pointer_pi: + ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); + if (ret) + return ret; + if ((int)t < 0) + return -EINVAL; + *((unsigned int *) ptr) = t; + return len; case attr_pointer_ui: ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t); if (ret) From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:23 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913520 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=bkay=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1694-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3S1zgfz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV3S1Y0Mz4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV3S1V8Sz4wck; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:40 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.88.99; helo=sv.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1694-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org [139.178.88.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3R6LWYz4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:39 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37B2283FBD for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EAC80045; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C29197FBA2; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847943; cv=none; b=P5Q4/NXWDOi7sIYGnGfHHCn6vmHKe7stGGbxXmdOQePtqLI6VDXvado32tQgamgK4t+xtb1i2xe3AVFT40eZFqXVwglcqZkix1A7v4ZQNQpyC4ciEaZ/+JZboU1qpYhiPh1CAy764lWuVP6E97y6cOqOny8AP+xGg8TeqqaPsW0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847943; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z1PfTQCHqpaHAw0hjUIVt4fpmIlFDfWjpJ3N+/nqPNo=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FXN9mUVuYaXTG5Zgfkm6qPKbZKNwXkTvCC8IkuAuPaW7HAU/7dvVvoZ4wcfTMnl9npg82yYcVqD0fasvmAedibp5VRoweCZS2h/OC4/UYFBcerXZbcPHXD9OiKZpz+BhNC5jnqan8fCTHWCOxqRHTND3hXOB7tiD0z0OT92V4xw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTyr5jtfz2Bgq0; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:29:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61175140124; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:12 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 7/9] ext4: set type of ac_groups_linear_remaining to __u32 to avoid overflow Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-8-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) Now ac_groups_linear_remaining is of type __u16 and s_mb_max_linear_groups is of type unsigned int, so an overflow occurs when setting a value above 65535 through the mb_max_linear_groups sysfs interface. Therefore, the type of ac_groups_linear_remaining is set to __u32 to avoid overflow. Fixes: 196e402adf2e ("ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning") CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h index 56938532b4ce..7bfc5fb5a128 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h @@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ struct ext4_allocation_context { ext4_grpblk_t ac_orig_goal_len; __u32 ac_flags; /* allocation hints */ + __u32 ac_groups_linear_remaining; __u16 ac_groups_scanned; - __u16 ac_groups_linear_remaining; __u16 ac_found; __u16 ac_cX_found[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS]; __u16 ac_tail; From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:24 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913521 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=peg+=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1695-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3c6Zzhz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV3c6Mrwz4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV3c6KJJz4wck; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:48 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=147.75.80.249; helo=am.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1695-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.80.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV3c2GVKz4wcg for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12A11F23116 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818028005C; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE99A7F7EF; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847943; cv=none; b=hTTpo3zsY4tsam5EiC/RjQ3YjaBmJ6GnyciHGLUjchCnOK4Owodpdmcu+CiKpMpCeWOA94M31qum72gPAdoOS6Fgfe09l7zE6og+Ju+nSkhUD/XiBDrV8f32zhfYU5uVG/+qcHivFizQRd3RJryCGCEWuiHISINI+G4J70Mr8x4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847943; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HUFyIyn2aR8nI6S7apzAbeRc6aQE+WXtA2u1lyTifaI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Aa9nYF1MMR8EsILcKA1Mkq6tJ1ZxVUOGqjbSOxdwS18GS6JoigG6V29eSNLHeicsC4X1UVRbKEkP8dKi4xfMkdEMr4KxxyKyiKCtWPT/AtnMifWgpBq+Ywv5+Ehh2OZPx7an13V5Gkvmee0NncD8IuQGnVDCUmhXGFiYEHnhZgM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.105]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTyt2Mx3zwPld; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:29:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC85D1404D7; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:13 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 8/9] ext4: set the type of max_zeroout to unsigned int to avoid overflow Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:24 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-9-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) The max_zeroout is of type int and the s_extent_max_zeroout_kb is of type uint, and the s_extent_max_zeroout_kb can be freely modified via the sysfs interface. When the block size is 1024, max_zeroout may overflow, so declare it as unsigned int to avoid overflow. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index e57054bdc5fd..e067f2dd0335 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -3402,9 +3402,10 @@ static int ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_extent *ex, *abut_ex; ext4_lblk_t ee_block, eof_block; unsigned int ee_len, depth, map_len = map->m_len; - int allocated = 0, max_zeroout = 0; int err = 0; int split_flag = EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2; + int allocated = 0; + unsigned int max_zeroout = 0; ext_debug(inode, "logical block %llu, max_blocks %u\n", (unsigned long long)map->m_lblk, map_len); From patchwork Tue Mar 19 11:33:25 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baokun Li X-Patchwork-Id: 1913517 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=wttt=kz=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1691-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV2l5P7Xz23sG for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzV2l4xHSz4wc1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4TzV2l4trSz4wcg; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:03 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; helo=sv.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1691-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzV2l2d16z4wc1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:33:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 013CA2845CF for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB587F7F7; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696BF7F485; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847938; cv=none; b=NbQ7ommskNzsE1yyrqg9l2yONygjobMY5Fr5WvLb/yS+jqqtvv7p6Ww/SpSqtYhXq7Sq01Y5GAdwMSy0Xmo88zt5FCGHCEx8N9G2PXhPp80HZEvGdZvhrQGHtCk+67yR9KEHqADo30Oi/xS/oYc9yQ937wDjSOvtyHnvyi586Q4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710847938; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0n5+Sdvy+OTRXKi5f3l2hiJnqHHcszu9qyw8Fm2oqrI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SoFj8rZWwoTlokHpHMOXmSpCb2OA4NarakcSXPDlEFTN5iA71t+vviLHylQyUXhueUZ0qcCRVoirTmE3L4gr44luUtj/7svT9Ufq1e4TK947uRpVdpKWxG4B9lnBmNfr/zSGWDGqthMzvy9svviPKpPNa8H8ieZEzVHp7rv84as= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.163]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TzTyt0zF6z1h2l9; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:29:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.21]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81118180060; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:32:13 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v4 9/9] ext4: clean up s_mb_rb_lock to fix build warnings with C=1 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:33:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20240319113325.3110393-10-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20240319113325.3110393-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.21) Running sparse (make C=1) on mballoc.c we get the following warning: fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3194:13: warning: context imbalance in 'ext4_mb_seq_structs_summary_start' - wrong count at exit This is because __acquires(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_rb_lock) was called in ext4_mb_seq_structs_summary_start(), but s_mb_rb_lock was removed in commit 83e80a6e3543 ("ext4: use buckets for cr 1 block scan instead of rbtree"), so remove the __acquires to silence the warning. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index dbf04f91516c..c65fac9b8c72 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -3190,7 +3190,6 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset) } static void *ext4_mb_seq_structs_summary_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos) -__acquires(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_rb_lock) { struct super_block *sb = pde_data(file_inode(seq->file)); unsigned long position;