From patchwork Tue Jan 10 01:39:00 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" X-Patchwork-Id: 1723772 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=MeU5vqR8; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NrYPb2JwXz23fY for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:38:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230108AbjAJBi4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:38:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56032 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230087AbjAJBiz (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:38:55 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED03B203D; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 17:38:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BBE9614A7; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54760C433D2; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:38:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1673314733; bh=0KsXPwa+vpt2uUTuNq9JANlQlF0R1EPm/dJEZEJYJRs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=MeU5vqR8R1uSRt9MD3bd3OrrRjIKXeUY0UbHixtqY/UGpVkda6zofuFcj9tc2X7ZY LGr+WYf3JykV0N+ugVYi+j8TZBz/EtV4zyy6Z81IOB4AFfrdleLPDXFESRi6cJUoS6 7QKRubuUaS47zGylZ22cekIk2QZyAVjr557j/eqND0TYwj9y8CsH7exppiJU/N61ib l9LtIkojiEQyu3cfmUEm8yVgmCTo5ioUILyyr1IdoP7zdmHTvY7PRte0hRNMTCovXb EalNqY1wl4iSNJz69le28Y7UsZ3z4+DxUapCoxxSbUOHn5vgRUYMYHkbvyxeSprQwk kgvdH0w2y1ZBw== Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 19:39:00 -0600 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH][next] cifs: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and we are moving towards adopting C99 flexible-array members instead. So, replace zero-length arrays in a couple of structures with flex-array members. This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [2]. Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays [1] Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [2] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- fs/cifs/ntlmssp.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/ntlmssp.h b/fs/cifs/ntlmssp.h index 55758b9ec877..2c5dde2ece58 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/ntlmssp.h +++ b/fs/cifs/ntlmssp.h @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ typedef struct _NEGOTIATE_MESSAGE { SECURITY_BUFFER WorkstationName; /* RFC 1001 and ASCII */ /* SECURITY_BUFFER for version info not present since we do not set the version is present flag */ - char DomainString[0]; + char DomainString[]; /* followed by WorkstationString */ } __attribute__((packed)) NEGOTIATE_MESSAGE, *PNEGOTIATE_MESSAGE; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ typedef struct _AUTHENTICATE_MESSAGE { __le32 NegotiateFlags; /* SECURITY_BUFFER for version info not present since we do not set the version is present flag */ - char UserString[0]; + char UserString[]; } __attribute__((packed)) AUTHENTICATE_MESSAGE, *PAUTHENTICATE_MESSAGE; /*