From patchwork Thu Dec 8 03:34:24 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ye Bin X-Patchwork-Id: 1713530 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=4qey=4g=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NSK4B3Z7rz23ys for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NSK4B33pvz4xN4 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4NSK4B30zxz4xRB; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:46 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NSK4B2xH7z4xN4 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229720AbiLHDNn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55802 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229523AbiLHDNi (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:38 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB67E6F0DD; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:13:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NSK3v1rXwz4f3v5d; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:13:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S5; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:13:34 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin , syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] ext4: fix incorrect calculate 'reserved' in '__es_remove_extent' when enable bigalloc feature Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:34:24 +0800 Message-Id: <20221208033426.1832460-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJF1UXr1rXF4UJF45CryrCrg_yoW8KFWDp3 y8Ar4UWryfuw1UW3yfJw1j9rn29a4UCr47WFs3t343uFy5A34Sgr10kFs0vFWYqrWIga1D XFWrtw12q3WUJaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvmb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26ryj6rWUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0 oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7V C0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j 6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF 67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2 z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnU UI43ZEXa7IU1M7K7UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Ye Bin Syzbot report issue as follows: EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_validate_block_bitmap:398: comm rep: bg 0: block 5: invalid block bitmap EXT4-fs (loop0): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 18 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 32 with error 28 EXT4-fs (loop0): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (loop0): Total free blocks count 0 EXT4-fs (loop0): Free/Dirty block details EXT4-fs (loop0): free_blocks=0 EXT4-fs (loop0): dirty_blocks=32 EXT4-fs (loop0): Block reservation details EXT4-fs (loop0): i_reserved_data_blocks=2 EXT4-fs (loop0): Inode 18 (00000000845cd634): i_reserved_data_blocks (1) not cleared! Above issue happens as follows: Assume: sbi->s_cluster_ratio = 16 Step1: Insert delay block [0, 31] -> ei->i_reserved_data_blocks=2 Step2: ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent -> return failed mpage_release_unused_pages -> to release [0, 30] ext4_es_remove_extent -> remove lblk=0 end=30 __es_remove_extent -> len1=0 len2=31-30=1 __es_remove_extent: ... if (len2 > 0) { ... if (len1 > 0) { ... } else { es->es_lblk = end + 1; es->es_len = len2; ... } if (count_reserved) count_rsvd(inode, lblk, ...); goto out; -> will return but didn't calculate 'reserved' ... Step3: ext4_destroy_inode -> trigger "i_reserved_data_blocks (1) not cleared!" To solve above issue if 'len2>0' call 'get_rsvd()' before goto out. Reported-by: syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 8fcc3a580651 ("ext4: rework reserved cluster accounting when invalidating pages") Signed-off-by: Ye Bin Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney --- fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c index cd0a861853e3..7ada374ff27d 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, if (count_reserved) count_rsvd(inode, lblk, orig_es.es_len - len1 - len2, &orig_es, &rc); - goto out; + goto out_get_reserved; } if (len1 > 0) { @@ -1413,6 +1413,7 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, } } +out_get_reserved: if (count_reserved) *reserved = get_rsvd(inode, end, es, &rc); out: From patchwork Thu Dec 8 03:34:25 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ye Bin X-Patchwork-Id: 1713528 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=4qey=4g=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NSK480kSmz23ys for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NSK466BrMz4xRB for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4NSK4668nPz4xYQ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:42 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NSK4665P1z4xRB for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229658AbiLHDNk (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229522AbiLHDNi (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:38 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A9570625; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NSK3v48LTz4f3k6P; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:13:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S6; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:13:34 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin , Eric Whitney Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] ext4: record error when detect abnormal 'i_reserved_data_blocks' Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:34:25 +0800 Message-Id: <20221208033426.1832460-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S6 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7GF1DXr1UJFW8Zr17uF13XFb_yoWkCFcEqw 40yF10v3yrXw4IgFs5Gr13JFZYkF4kCr18Ww1rKF15Zw1YvF4DCw4kAry3Arn5Way8Gr90 9rWrJryfXrWfWjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbskYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Xr0_Wr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l82xGYIkIc2x26280x7IE14v26r15M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW5JwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK 021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r xl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl 6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6x IIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_ Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr 1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE 14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7 IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E 87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73Uj IFyTuYvjxU2_MaUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Ye Bin If 'i_reserved_data_blocks' is not cleared which mean something wrong with code, free space accounting is likely wrong, according to Jan Kara's advice use ext4_error() to record this abnormal let fsck to repair and also we can capture this issue. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney --- fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index 840e0a614959..4b2d257d3845 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -1387,10 +1387,10 @@ static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode) } if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks) - ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR, - "Inode %lu (%p): i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!", - inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode), - EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks); + ext4_error(inode->i_sb, + "Inode %lu (%p): i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!", + inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode), + EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks); } static void init_once(void *foo) From patchwork Thu Dec 8 03:34:26 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ye Bin X-Patchwork-Id: 1713531 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=4qey=4g=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NSK4C35Mpz23ys for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NSK4C2c7cz4xRB for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4NSK4C2YFXz4xYQ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:47 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NSK4C1thTz4xRB for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 14:13:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229779AbiLHDNo (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55810 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229572AbiLHDNi (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:13:38 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88DA25C746; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NSK3v6T9dz4f3kpC; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:13:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S7; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 11:13:34 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin , syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] ext4: add check pending tree when evict inode Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:34:26 +0800 Message-Id: <20221208033426.1832460-4-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221208033426.1832460-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgAn0a9cVpFjvYz4Bg--.16330S7 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxGrWxAF1kKw4DJr1UAF4rGrg_yoW5Jw1rp3 4UGw15Cr4kur1DCF4ftF15Jr13Wa1vkF4UJrWrKr1jqFy8Ja4xtFnrtr1agF4UJrZxur1Y qF18Cr9YqrW8G3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvmb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUWw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0 oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7V C0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j 6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF 67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2 z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnU UI43ZEXa7IU8-zVUUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Ye Bin Syzbot found the following issue: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff8881bde17420 (size 32): comm "rep", pid 2327, jiffies 4295381963 (age 32.265s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<00000000ac6d38f8>] __insert_pending+0x13c/0x2d0 [<00000000d717de3b>] ext4_es_insert_delayed_block+0x399/0x4e0 [<000000004be03913>] ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop.0+0x739/0xfa0 [<00000000885a832a>] ext4_da_get_block_prep+0x10c/0x440 [<0000000029b7f8ef>] __block_write_begin_int+0x28d/0x860 [<00000000e182ebc3>] ext4_da_write_inline_data_begin+0x2d1/0xf30 [<00000000ced0c8a2>] ext4_da_write_begin+0x612/0x860 [<000000008d5f27fa>] generic_perform_write+0x215/0x4d0 [<00000000552c1cde>] ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x101/0x3b0 [<0000000052177ae8>] do_iter_readv_writev+0x19f/0x340 [<000000004b9de834>] do_iter_write+0x13b/0x650 [<00000000e2401b9b>] iter_file_splice_write+0x5a5/0xab0 [<0000000023aa5d90>] direct_splice_actor+0x103/0x1e0 [<0000000089e00fc1>] splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c9/0x7b0 [<000000004386851e>] do_splice_direct+0x159/0x280 [<00000000b567e609>] do_sendfile+0x932/0x1200 Above issue fixed by commit 1b8f787ef547 ("ext4: fix warning in 'ext4_da_release_space'") in this scene. To make things better add check pending tree when evict inode. According to Eric Whitney's suggestion, bigalloc + inline is still in development so we just add test for this situation, there isn't need to add code to free pending tree entry. Reported-by: syzbot+05a0f0ccab4a25626e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Ye Bin Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney --- fs/ext4/super.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index 4b2d257d3845..15b6634975e7 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode) "Inode %lu (%p): i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!", inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode), EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks); + + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_pending_tree.root)) + ext4_error(inode->i_sb, + "Inode %lu (%p): i_pending_tree not empty!", + inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode)); } static void init_once(void *foo)