From patchwork Wed Jul 20 00:32:53 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: DJ Delorie X-Patchwork-Id: 1658268 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ft+hCOTR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=sourceware.org (client-ip=2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=libc-alpha-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@sourceware.org; receiver=) Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LncB81R4Xz9s2R for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:33:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BD43858C52 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:33:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 71BD43858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1658277197; bh=SHBngZkB8jCgUJOzyBMiVjfLPJ3QK0uKAh/M0+BzG74=; h=To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=ft+hCOTRyntq25KkgL9AaAT8BX02oxSO4eYXzx7klOG+7++3gLvepP/3HDf6REgZ6 UPcuzIH0Sl9FlQr3+YAo2MlkJdBlKYoJCgSHCl1pyanMVtx9kZPFodXNoKu5XAbT3s 6pOfgwRpqZeUVUY85rKaYTcVgZ8VXukECVfKkXAE= X-Original-To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Delivered-To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B68AB3858D37 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:33:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B68AB3858D37 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-388-wuzsLFpZNJKG32hPVCDJgA-1; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:32:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wuzsLFpZNJKG32hPVCDJgA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA883C0218C for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com (unknown [10.22.8.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2257140EBE3; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from greed.delorie.com.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 26K0Wrpc472281; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:32:53 -0400 To: Florian Weimer Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] memalign: Support scanning for aligned chunks. In-Reply-To: <878ropa29e.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:32:53 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha From: DJ Delorie Reply-To: DJ Delorie Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" Florian Weimer writes: > MAYBE_INIT_TCACHE does not seem necessary. If the tcache is empty, > there's no need to initialize it and scane it. And why not scan the > entire chain here? It's another source of missed chunk reuse. > > The tcache null check should be written as tcache != NULL. [v3: cleaned up all the != NULL cases, added messy logic to remove non-head tcache chunks] This patch adds a chunk scanning algorithm to the _int_memalign code path that reduces heap fragmentation by reusing already aligned chunks instead of always looking for chunks of larger sizes and splitting them. The tcache macros are extended to allow removing a chunk from the middle of the list. The goal is to fix the pathological use cases where heaps grow continuously in workloads that are heavy users of memalign. Note that tst-memalign-2 checks for tcache operation, which malloc-check bypasses. diff --git a/malloc/Makefile b/malloc/Makefile index 4e32de2a0b..084c408ac7 100644 --- a/malloc/Makefile +++ b/malloc/Makefile @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ tests := mallocbug tst-malloc tst-valloc tst-calloc tst-obstack \ tst-tcfree1 tst-tcfree2 tst-tcfree3 \ tst-safe-linking \ tst-mallocalign1 \ + tst-memalign-2 tests-static := \ tst-interpose-static-nothread \ @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ test-srcs = tst-mtrace # with MALLOC_CHECK_=3 because they expect a specific failure. tests-exclude-malloc-check = tst-malloc-check tst-malloc-usable \ tst-mxfast tst-safe-linking \ - tst-compathooks-off tst-compathooks-on + tst-compathooks-off tst-compathooks-on tst-memalign-2 # Run all tests with MALLOC_CHECK_=3 tests-malloc-check = $(filter-out $(tests-exclude-malloc-check) \ diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c index 12908b8f97..364125e6b4 100644 --- a/malloc/malloc.c +++ b/malloc/malloc.c @@ -3185,19 +3185,44 @@ tcache_put (mchunkptr chunk, size_t tc_idx) } /* Caller must ensure that we know tc_idx is valid and there's - available chunks to remove. */ + available chunks to remove. Removes chunk from the middle of the + list. */ static __always_inline void * -tcache_get (size_t tc_idx) +tcache_get_n (size_t tc_idx, tcache_entry **ep) { - tcache_entry *e = tcache->entries[tc_idx]; + tcache_entry *e; + if (ep == &(tcache->entries[tc_idx])) + e = *ep; + else + e = REVEAL_PTR (*ep); + if (__glibc_unlikely (!aligned_OK (e))) malloc_printerr ("malloc(): unaligned tcache chunk detected"); - tcache->entries[tc_idx] = REVEAL_PTR (e->next); + + if (ep == &(tcache->entries[tc_idx])) + *ep = REVEAL_PTR (e->next); + else + *ep = PROTECT_PTR (ep, REVEAL_PTR (e->next)); + --(tcache->counts[tc_idx]); e->key = 0; return (void *) e; } +/* Like the above, but removes from the head of the list. */ +static __always_inline void * +tcache_get (size_t tc_idx) +{ + return tcache_get_n (tc_idx, & tcache->entries[tc_idx]); +} + +/* Iterates through the tcache linked list. */ +static __always_inline void * +tcache_next (tcache_entry *e) +{ + return (tcache_entry *) REVEAL_PTR (e->next); +} + static void tcache_thread_shutdown (void) { @@ -3306,7 +3331,7 @@ __libc_malloc (size_t bytes) DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; if (tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins - && tcache + && tcache != NULL && tcache->counts[tc_idx] > 0) { victim = tcache_get (tc_idx); @@ -3557,6 +3582,38 @@ _mid_memalign (size_t alignment, size_t bytes, void *address) alignment = a; } +#if USE_TCACHE + { + size_t tbytes; + tbytes = checked_request2size (bytes); + if (tbytes == 0) + { + __set_errno (ENOMEM); + return NULL; + } + size_t tc_idx = csize2tidx (tbytes); + + if (tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins + && tcache != NULL + && tcache->counts[tc_idx] > 0) + { + /* The tcache itself isn't encoded, but the chain is. */ + tcache_entry **tep = & tcache->entries[tc_idx]; + tcache_entry *te = *tep; + while (te != NULL && ((intptr_t)te & (alignment - 1)) != 0) + { + tep = & (te->next); + te = tcache_next (te); + } + if (te != NULL) + { + void *victim = tcache_get_n (tc_idx, tep); + return tag_new_usable (victim); + } + } + } +#endif + if (SINGLE_THREAD_P) { p = _int_memalign (&main_arena, alignment, bytes); @@ -3862,7 +3919,7 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes) /* While we're here, if we see other chunks of the same size, stash them in the tcache. */ size_t tc_idx = csize2tidx (nb); - if (tcache && tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins) + if (tcache != NULL && tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins) { mchunkptr tc_victim; @@ -3920,7 +3977,7 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes) /* While we're here, if we see other chunks of the same size, stash them in the tcache. */ size_t tc_idx = csize2tidx (nb); - if (tcache && tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins) + if (tcache != NULL && tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins) { mchunkptr tc_victim; @@ -3982,7 +4039,7 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes) #if USE_TCACHE INTERNAL_SIZE_T tcache_nb = 0; size_t tc_idx = csize2tidx (nb); - if (tcache && tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins) + if (tcache != NULL && tc_idx < mp_.tcache_bins) tcache_nb = nb; int return_cached = 0; @@ -4064,7 +4121,7 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes) #if USE_TCACHE /* Fill cache first, return to user only if cache fills. We may return one of these chunks later. */ - if (tcache_nb + if (tcache_nb > 0 && tcache->counts[tc_idx] < mp_.tcache_count) { tcache_put (victim, tc_idx); @@ -4937,6 +4994,43 @@ _int_realloc (mstate av, mchunkptr oldp, INTERNAL_SIZE_T oldsize, ------------------------------ memalign ------------------------------ */ +/* Returns 0 if the chunk is not and does not contain the requested + aligned sub-chunk, else returns the amount of "waste" from + trimming. BYTES is the *user* byte size, not the chunk byte + size. */ +static int +chunk_ok_for_memalign (mchunkptr p, size_t alignment, size_t bytes) +{ + void *m = chunk2mem (p); + INTERNAL_SIZE_T size = memsize (p); + void *aligned_m = m; + + if (__glibc_unlikely (misaligned_chunk (p))) + malloc_printerr ("_int_memalign(): unaligned chunk detected"); + + aligned_m = PTR_ALIGN_UP (m, alignment); + + INTERNAL_SIZE_T front_extra = (intptr_t) aligned_m - (intptr_t) m; + + /* We can't trim off the front as it's too small. */ + if (front_extra > 0 && front_extra < MINSIZE) + return 0; + + /* If it's a perfect fit, it's an exception to the return value rule + (we would return zero waste, which looks like "not usable"), so + handle it here by returning a small non-zero value instead. */ + if (size == bytes && front_extra == 0) + return 1; + + /* If the block we need fits in the chunk, calculate total waste. */ + if (size > bytes + front_extra) + return size - bytes; + + /* Can't use this chunk. */ + return 0; +} + +/* BYTES is user requested bytes, not requested chunksize bytes. */ static void * _int_memalign (mstate av, size_t alignment, size_t bytes) { @@ -4950,8 +5044,7 @@ _int_memalign (mstate av, size_t alignment, size_t bytes) mchunkptr remainder; /* spare room at end to split off */ unsigned long remainder_size; /* its size */ INTERNAL_SIZE_T size; - - + mchunkptr victim; nb = checked_request2size (bytes); if (nb == 0) @@ -4960,29 +5053,142 @@ _int_memalign (mstate av, size_t alignment, size_t bytes) return NULL; } - /* - Strategy: find a spot within that chunk that meets the alignment + /* We can't check tcache here because we hold the arena lock, which + tcache doesn't expect. We expect it has been checked + earlier. */ + + /* Strategy: search the bins looking for an existing block that + meets our needs. We scan a range of bins from "exact size" to + "just under 2x", spanning the small/large barrier if needed. If + we don't find anything in those bins, the common malloc code will + scan starting at 2x. */ + + /* This will be set if we found a candidate chunk. */ + victim = NULL; + + /* Fast bins are singly-linked, hard to remove a chunk from the middle + and unlikely to meet our alignment requirements. We have not done + any experimentation with searching for aligned fastbins. */ + + int first_bin_index; + int first_largebin_index; + int last_bin_index; + + if (in_smallbin_range (nb)) + first_bin_index = smallbin_index (nb); + else + first_bin_index = largebin_index (nb); + + if (in_smallbin_range (nb * 2)) + last_bin_index = smallbin_index (nb * 2); + else + last_bin_index = largebin_index (nb * 2); + + first_largebin_index = largebin_index (MIN_LARGE_SIZE); + + int victim_index; /* its bin index */ + + for (victim_index = first_bin_index; + victim_index < last_bin_index; + victim_index ++) + { + victim = NULL; + + if (victim_index < first_largebin_index) + { + /* Check small bins. Small bin chunks are doubly-linked despite + being the same size. */ + + mchunkptr fwd; /* misc temp for linking */ + mchunkptr bck; /* misc temp for linking */ + + bck = bin_at (av, victim_index); + fwd = bck->fd; + while (fwd != bck) + { + if (chunk_ok_for_memalign (fwd, alignment, bytes) > 0) + { + victim = fwd; + + /* Unlink it */ + victim->fd->bk = victim->bk; + victim->bk->fd = victim->fd; + break; + } + + fwd = fwd->fd; + } + } + else + { + /* Check large bins. */ + mchunkptr fwd; /* misc temp for linking */ + mchunkptr bck; /* misc temp for linking */ + mchunkptr best = NULL; + size_t best_size = 0; + + bck = bin_at (av, victim_index); + fwd = bck->fd; + + while (fwd != bck) + { + int extra; + + if (chunksize (fwd) < nb) + break; + extra = chunk_ok_for_memalign (fwd, alignment, bytes); + if (extra > 0 + && (extra <= best_size || best == NULL)) + { + best = fwd; + best_size = extra; + } + + fwd = fwd->fd; + } + victim = best; + + if (victim != NULL) + { + unlink_chunk (av, victim); + break; + } + } + + if (victim != NULL) + break; + } + + /* Strategy: find a spot within that chunk that meets the alignment request, and then possibly free the leading and trailing space. - */ + This strategy is incredibly costly and can lead to external + fragmentation if header and footer chunks are unused. */ - /* Call malloc with worst case padding to hit alignment. */ + if (victim != NULL) + { + p = victim; + m = chunk2mem (p); + set_inuse (p); + } + else + { + /* Call malloc with worst case padding to hit alignment. */ - m = (char *) (_int_malloc (av, nb + alignment + MINSIZE)); + m = (char *) (_int_malloc (av, nb + alignment + MINSIZE)); - if (m == 0) - return 0; /* propagate failure */ + if (m == 0) + return 0; /* propagate failure */ - p = mem2chunk (m); + p = mem2chunk (m); + } if ((((unsigned long) (m)) % alignment) != 0) /* misaligned */ - - { /* - Find an aligned spot inside chunk. Since we need to give back - leading space in a chunk of at least MINSIZE, if the first - calculation places us at a spot with less than MINSIZE leader, - we can move to the next aligned spot -- we've allocated enough - total room so that this is always possible. - */ + { + /* Find an aligned spot inside chunk. Since we need to give back + leading space in a chunk of at least MINSIZE, if the first + calculation places us at a spot with less than MINSIZE leader, + we can move to the next aligned spot -- we've allocated enough + total room so that this is always possible. */ brk = (char *) mem2chunk (((unsigned long) (m + alignment - 1)) & - ((signed long) alignment)); if ((unsigned long) (brk - (char *) (p)) < MINSIZE) diff --git a/malloc/tst-memalign-2.c b/malloc/tst-memalign-2.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..432a37bd8b --- /dev/null +++ b/malloc/tst-memalign-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ +/* Test for memalign chunk reuse + Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + This file is part of the GNU C Library. + + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. + + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see + . */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include + +typedef struct TestCase { + size_t size; + size_t alignment; + void *ptr1; + void *ptr2; +} TestCase; + +static TestCase tcache_allocs[] = { + { 24, 8, NULL, NULL }, + { 24, 16, NULL, NULL }, + { 128, 32, NULL, NULL } +}; +#define TN array_length (tcache_allocs) + +static TestCase large_allocs[] = { + { 23450, 64, NULL, NULL }, + { 23450, 64, NULL, NULL }, + { 23550, 64, NULL, NULL }, + { 23550, 64, NULL, NULL }, + { 23650, 64, NULL, NULL }, + { 23650, 64, NULL, NULL }, + { 33650, 64, NULL, NULL }, + { 33650, 64, NULL, NULL } +}; +#define LN array_length (large_allocs) + +void *p; + +static int +do_test (void) +{ + int i, j; + int count; + void *ptr[10]; + void *p; + + /* TCache test. */ + + for (i = 0; i < TN; ++ i) + { + tcache_allocs[i].ptr1 = memalign (tcache_allocs[i].alignment, tcache_allocs[i].size); + free (tcache_allocs[i].ptr1); + /* This should return the same chunk as was just free'd. */ + tcache_allocs[i].ptr2 = memalign (tcache_allocs[i].alignment, tcache_allocs[i].size); + free (tcache_allocs[i].ptr2); + + TEST_VERIFY (tcache_allocs[i].ptr1 == tcache_allocs[i].ptr2); + } + + /* Test for non-head tcache hits. */ + for (i = 0; i < 10; ++ i) + { + if (i == 4) + ptr[i] = memalign (64, 256); + else + ptr[i] = malloc (256); + } + for (i = 0; i < 10; ++ i) + free (ptr[i]); + + p = memalign (64, 256); + + count = 0; + for (i = 0; i < 10; ++ i) + if (ptr[i] == p) + ++ count; + free (p); + TEST_VERIFY (count > 0); + + /* Large bins test. */ + + for (i = 0; i < LN; ++ i) + { + large_allocs[i].ptr1 = memalign (large_allocs[i].alignment, large_allocs[i].size); + /* Keep chunks from combining by fragmenting the heap. */ + p = malloc (512); + } + + for (i = 0; i < LN; ++ i) + free (large_allocs[i].ptr1); + + /* Force the unsorted bins to be scanned and moved to small/large + bins. */ + p = malloc (60000); + + for (i = 0; i < LN; ++ i) + large_allocs[i].ptr2 = memalign (large_allocs[i].alignment, large_allocs[i].size); + + count = 0; + for (i = 0; i < LN; ++ i) + { + int ok = 0; + for (j = 0; j < LN; ++ j) + if (large_allocs[i].ptr1 == large_allocs[j].ptr2) + ok = 1; + if (ok == 1) + count ++; + } + + /* The allocation algorithm is complicated outside of the memalign + logic, so just make sure it's working for most of the + allocations. This avoids possible boundary conditions with + empty/full heaps. */ + TEST_VERIFY (count > LN / 2); + + return 0; +} + +#define TEST_FUNCTION do_test () +#include "../test-skeleton.c"