From patchwork Tue Jun 21 05:57:22 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexandre Oliva X-Patchwork-Id: 1645852 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=qPz8NvIR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LRwm24FKgz9sGT for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 15:57:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D419385627C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 05:57:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D419385627C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1655791071; bh=bCgu0Stwi0nygjprOYWus/1vzC4LlUXYVt0snKwUGck=; h=To:Subject:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=qPz8NvIRc780/Yu7bgma1HvyBKL/mcwyJqwfIFtGcuw5y19snbpDb3osGOjFUEOgx LV5W4cFODNJq5EKn+uDh6YhOa5HgIKnKFYATC3H3iA4y34Zj3RU02CV6JT78iYCMjB 1SBLpzM8+VlovO4bhfKtkLkv95AYHCCjYMyEvkGU= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (rock.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:a9e:1ff:fe9b:1d1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD418385AE4E for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 05:57:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DD418385AE4E Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46971160D9; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 01:57:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8u0zkxB2vgqY; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 01:57:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from free.home (tron.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:46a8:42ff:fe0e:e294]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB571160D8; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 01:57:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from livre (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by free.home (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 25L5vMcC693471 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:57:23 -0300 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] c++: testsuite: require lto_incremental in pr90990_0.C Organization: Free thinker, does not speak for AdaCore Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:57:22 -0300 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches From: Alexandre Oliva Reply-To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Richard Biener Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" Other LTO tests that use -r require the lto_incremental effective target. I suppose pr90990_0.C is missing it due to an oversight. This patch arranges for this test to also be skipped on non-lto_incremental targets. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install? for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog * g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C: Require lto_incremental target. --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C index 22a5e3ffaaa45..74cc2bbd92889 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ // { dg-lto-do link } /* { dg-extra-ld-options { -r -nostdlib } } */ +// { dg-require-effective-target lto_incremental } class A { public: float m_floats;