From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:20 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536916 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=e9xO5ns6; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Jf6cRvz9sR4 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:27:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8Jf5DTdz30R2 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:27:14 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=e9xO5ns6; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=e9xO5ns6; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Hf2hWrz2xWf for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:22 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195IGRJt029122; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=LmFE0hxjZrzghZUAElVYKvtoh+3luW6wVtAiJd9fn5Y=; b=e9xO5ns6ts00F5GkcYLbuQMw4WXtJvKJe4pvEnSaLx94xhL6EdoAqIHOEU3NzEc41jvM mzI+PegPdvxaz0CMRFE4sarozh7lGGAMdPAMFtZBTOc8RgNRIzuogwZQL/AlfQhw5D7P 2MIZq8oAT6QUlXtTW+O8FmWPXBHLd4m6p00wF5uaDhNXwb7LbRlbvArTQkfET+e7YgSS v9MK9iqfAQlvKh595jalS2vF2nioEmXQOUUZ95o5YUUk9VrICCMOSixQcInqdIuWMPp8 k0SsAn+V7m20YbznrQ1QgfCaICReXQTT+QdbYPlfogmdDBvgUNKdknBT6MQek0XtvJOR Yg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bguu8tvs4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:02 -0400 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195JpBdf032304; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:02 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bguu8tvrq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIiNm012989; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:00 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2ax1m9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:00 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KPvCv43647478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:25:57 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C237AE045; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:25:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9FEAE05F; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:25:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:25:53 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 01/10] powerpc/lib: Add helper to check if offset is within conditional branch range Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:20 +0530 Message-Id: <442b69a34ced32ca346a0d9a855f3f6cfdbbbd41.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: u3U_l7ksKbmKzuhD9HgwXTb4-C8sXkId X-Proofpoint-GUID: SK0-Y9tEagPgVu366Fw0PkxpSMEMp9Tn X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Add a helper to check if a given offset is within the branch range for a powerpc conditional branch instruction, and update some sites to use the new helper. Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- Changelog: - Change 0x7FFF to 0x7fff, per Christophe arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 7 ++++++- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 7 +------ 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h index a95f63788c6b14..4ba834599c4d4c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #define BRANCH_ABSOLUTE 0x2 bool is_offset_in_branch_range(long offset); +bool is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(long offset); int create_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const u32 *addr, unsigned long target, int flags); int create_cond_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const u32 *addr, diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c index f9a3019e37b43c..c5ed9882383521 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c @@ -228,6 +228,11 @@ bool is_offset_in_branch_range(long offset) return (offset >= -0x2000000 && offset <= 0x1fffffc && !(offset & 0x3)); } +bool is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(long offset) +{ + return offset >= -0x8000 && offset <= 0x7fff && !(offset & 0x3); +} + /* * Helper to check if a given instruction is a conditional branch * Derived from the conditional checks in analyse_instr() @@ -280,7 +285,7 @@ int create_cond_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const u32 *addr, offset = offset - (unsigned long)addr; /* Check we can represent the target in the instruction format */ - if (offset < -0x8000 || offset > 0x7FFF || offset & 0x3) + if (!is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(offset)) return 1; /* Mask out the flags and target, so they don't step on each other. */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 99fad093f43ec1..935ea95b66359e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -78,11 +78,6 @@ #define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI32(d, i); } while(0) #endif -static inline bool is_nearbranch(int offset) -{ - return (offset < 32768) && (offset >= -32768); -} - /* * The fly in the ointment of code size changing from pass to pass is * avoided by padding the short branch case with a NOP. If code size differs @@ -91,7 +86,7 @@ static inline bool is_nearbranch(int offset) * state. */ #define PPC_BCC(cond, dest) do { \ - if (is_nearbranch((dest) - (ctx->idx * 4))) { \ + if (is_offset_in_cond_branch_range((long)(dest) - (ctx->idx * 4))) { \ PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest); \ EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); \ } else { \ From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:21 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536918 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Hiq+hJMT; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8KS2gt1z9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:27:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8KS1fDmz3c6d for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:27:56 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Hiq+hJMT; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Hiq+hJMT; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Hk5RsYz2yYx for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195IGRJw029122; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=CyOXO9aYeDaozU1KTTU8Vu6gjClNlcoQHkw2o6PQMZY=; b=Hiq+hJMTYdhO/MFqGvixI3dBkW7j09GBPQ03z/8IREz4glbmUJXfAd7SD6I9vpA0lUre vJD2Mb/On2ncdRearJ4s7AhU9zFrgcsqYHesMK/W3PgCe3uMlSfOfDs9m4HH2Na7xhdy ytvu8LCshiT6sHHA9w60zZCsBJlTRZ6bBeMkDUQS8fIF/sIP/NLupkmlfEyZK1Nc2OED Vl2vuuvgenTW06U/25MATMEfG7qDOhx0QCwV7iu5n7e8HVxG/Y+NB2bFwzWmDI4xevH/ mvf++U4IMMRp3guy0UP6fXUqiwFw4TObKqyPXmZ1AFrX42OvQgnDhIMV2DRQjgcLjRn2 /w== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bguu8tvu0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:08 -0400 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195JpBdh032304; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:07 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bguu8tvte-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIf4u012951; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:05 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2ax1mp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:05 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KKj7F53739794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:20:45 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F34AE057; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D11AE045; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:25:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:25:59 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] powerpc/bpf: Validate branch ranges Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:21 +0530 Message-Id: <71d33a6b7603ec1013c9734dd8bdd4ff5e929142.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: D17SSZCLy2Nwv5iHby0G_zt4N3YIu2UO X-Proofpoint-GUID: PR4DfWxlQC1zXccEr_fquW06n0UmhpuY X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Add checks to ensure that we never emit branch instructions with truncated branch offsets. Acked-by: Song Liu Acked-by: Johan Almbladh Tested-by: Johan Almbladh Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 8 ++++++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 8 ++++++-- 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 935ea95b66359e..7e9b978b768ed9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -24,16 +24,30 @@ #define EMIT(instr) PLANT_INSTR(image, ctx->idx, instr) /* Long jump; (unconditional 'branch') */ -#define PPC_JMP(dest) EMIT(PPC_INST_BRANCH | \ - (((dest) - (ctx->idx * 4)) & 0x03fffffc)) +#define PPC_JMP(dest) \ + do { \ + long offset = (long)(dest) - (ctx->idx * 4); \ + if (!is_offset_in_branch_range(offset)) { \ + pr_err_ratelimited("Branch offset 0x%lx (@%u) out of range\n", offset, ctx->idx); \ + return -ERANGE; \ + } \ + EMIT(PPC_INST_BRANCH | (offset & 0x03fffffc)); \ + } while (0) + /* blr; (unconditional 'branch' with link) to absolute address */ #define PPC_BL_ABS(dest) EMIT(PPC_INST_BL | \ (((dest) - (unsigned long)(image + ctx->idx)) & 0x03fffffc)) /* "cond" here covers BO:BI fields. */ -#define PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest) EMIT(PPC_INST_BRANCH_COND | \ - (((cond) & 0x3ff) << 16) | \ - (((dest) - (ctx->idx * 4)) & \ - 0xfffc)) +#define PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest) \ + do { \ + long offset = (long)(dest) - (ctx->idx * 4); \ + if (!is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(offset)) { \ + pr_err_ratelimited("Conditional branch offset 0x%lx (@%u) out of range\n", offset, ctx->idx); \ + return -ERANGE; \ + } \ + EMIT(PPC_INST_BRANCH_COND | (((cond) & 0x3ff) << 16) | (offset & 0xfffc)); \ + } while (0) + /* Sign-extended 32-bit immediate load */ #define PPC_LI32(d, i) do { \ if ((int)(uintptr_t)(i) >= -32768 && \ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 53aefee3fe70be..fcbf7a917c566e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -210,7 +210,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) /* Now build the prologue, body code & epilogue for real. */ cgctx.idx = 0; bpf_jit_build_prologue(code_base, &cgctx); - bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs, extra_pass); + if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs, extra_pass)) { + bpf_jit_binary_free(bpf_hdr); + fp = org_fp; + goto out_addrs; + } bpf_jit_build_epilogue(code_base, &cgctx); if (bpf_jit_enable > 1) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index beb12cbc8c2994..a74d52204f8da2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 fun } } -static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out) +static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out) { /* * By now, the eBPF program has already setup parameters in r3-r6 @@ -261,7 +261,9 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTR()); + /* out: */ + return 0; } /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue */ @@ -1090,7 +1092,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * */ case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL: ctx->seen |= SEEN_TAILCALL; - bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(image, ctx, addrs[i + 1]); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(image, ctx, addrs[i + 1]); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; break; default: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index b87a63dba9c8fb..f06c62089b1457 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 fun EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); } -static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out) +static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out) { /* * By now, the eBPF program has already setup parameters in r3, r4 and r5 @@ -267,7 +267,9 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTR()); + /* out: */ + return 0; } /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue */ @@ -993,7 +995,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * */ case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL: ctx->seen |= SEEN_TAILCALL; - bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(image, ctx, addrs[i + 1]); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(image, ctx, addrs[i + 1]); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; break; default: From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:22 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536919 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=lEQUf3lC; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8LQ355Sz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:28:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8LQ21Jtz3cBc for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:28:46 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=lEQUf3lC; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=lEQUf3lC; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Hp6nVLz2xXJ for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:30 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195J7DX0024262; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=pXqV++OdnpQaiHtCwzpJSmTwcAyerUhEo4A8K2cfZGE=; b=lEQUf3lC28GUuTuenTr7Hf4/kfwby46+I1YdEMaguvCAK/qMkKZlD7ELBVsHjFOWBHLy BGV03fumB/wpEtKUA46QS9QVlXpcLfkjSTGauCy+PlyQ4y1zqHIX5m9iVpNOEIsoYAKe b9coxYa74JjMQ6FrWclo3bO/pFHqOSk/kHZRaAyyBXzZ89GchFoIsG8yOkwXSzmEp4UH Cc8fwuiiOI4RcP3r+afqYszn3s5Hu5YrYSlxs92fDhBhpsqvwZ1dDvfQ8Qx4lLRSEolY ROhNqCfFnv/Ynn2TuNn28hHWCIuqn1VMgHZUOJQOA0Khkm5zFgFgT/JlURmk16xUl6ZB 6A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgtj8mhhx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:11 -0400 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195JqsVF032109; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:11 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgtj8mhhd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:11 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KJ3vN021893; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:09 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3beepjkvpm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:09 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KQ6mT46465298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:06 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84A5AE045; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4096CAE04D; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:02 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 03/10] powerpc/bpf: Fix BPF_MOD when imm == 1 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:22 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: zQLJxPptVbKOzJoo-n8N_n-ari8f-OXO X-Proofpoint-GUID: KqLJVUgYEZhz-wlri1nv13ecie6lfnhU X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Only ignore the operation if dividing by 1. Acked-by: Song Liu Acked-by: Johan Almbladh Tested-by: Johan Almbladh Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index f06c62089b1457..d67f6d62e2e1ff 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -391,8 +391,14 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K: /* dst /= imm */ if (imm == 0) return -EINVAL; - else if (imm == 1) - goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + if (imm == 1) { + if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_DIV) { + goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + } else { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0)); + break; + } + } PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); switch (BPF_CLASS(code)) { From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:23 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536921 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=h4dMKaJ5; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8MC6PTxz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:29:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8MC4rbtz3cDh for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:29:27 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=h4dMKaJ5; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=h4dMKaJ5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Hz0RF8z2yWn for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:38 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195JkxkJ010155; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=i8WU+uecmS0bbQeBI3aOaT0Qz99UfNKVh77eTGD9RKQ=; b=h4dMKaJ5t86D44iRnIvyfJepwlXgwePtvWod6U+L7s2HxkXS8ywt4r+oDcDagn3D6sEg bbOruos6OeJWo76DAjRVWfdDqLuDJlVVDQcyvHD/yCiAJdVsinyRsIrsa3DUl0ff8C8D g0al1lTGv3IHwHyyMS5OUEGNlr6r79mWJv2mN4BQpq0e1VyZSbd1GSaRvkVAGnIbKJvk YX0pm71J6r8CB1Q5+1CEsFUSpOi9OPI4c9QQcAAdscomZiYfmqXK2INSWqREuOy1fAsg Xd2gc4DVNPxmPSPPs7pns+fbKbCvqfvAoxiB/ZcodU+Mhm9Z+zlTv2GxHMiDAIU66ad9 cQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgtw04e36-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:16 -0400 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195KOa8V004602; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:15 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgtw04e2h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIgKW012963; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:13 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2ax1nu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:13 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KQAAQ62521632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:10 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0CCAE055; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318B3AE051; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:06 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/bpf: Fix BPF_SUB when imm == 0x80000000 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:23 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: i-xqZF7ryL11R_mdTfTdm5PfHNJTXdn_ X-Proofpoint-GUID: aDYNopLgYvgf1PJ0Lmn-7171BTKYYsKf X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" We aren't handling subtraction involving an immediate value of 0x80000000 properly. Fix the same. Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- Changelog: - Split up BPF_ADD and BPF_SUB cases per Christophe's comments arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index d67f6d62e2e1ff..6626e6c17d4ed2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -330,18 +330,25 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst += (u32) imm */ - case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst -= (u32) imm */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K: /* dst += imm */ + if (!imm) { + goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + } else if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); + } else { + PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + } + goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst -= (u32) imm */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_K: /* dst -= imm */ - if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_SUB) - imm = -imm; - if (imm) { - if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); - else { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - } + if (!imm) { + goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + } else if (imm > -32768 && imm < 32768) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(-imm))); + } else { + PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); } goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X: /* (u32) dst *= (u32) src */ From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:24 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536922 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=G+++OY+x; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8N01mNQz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:30:08 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8N00NSdz3cM5 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:30:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=G+++OY+x; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=G+++OY+x; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8J00jcbz2ymZ for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:39 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195K6TMl005991; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=N31ZSmkalAA4r8JuhplzsNHWEDti/z2o06gJg9/4Jus=; b=G+++OY+xHGibqqvoLtAEP10oeRi+t/V21V0HzCCtBJXFd0fuKcLYurmXBuKFyj/5IScC ksj9r04KVclDaHzOZ2rZYoxEGVOJ7lZ/gMG6fVbMQ5fTB1lmq6SNLYC83N547dzSZCRU nagT2KhAUfyX745SWxfveUbSAg+2WCAC64XTukrTUn8ph76ZGVjGDS4bCUbRC6U8O2cl cRS1S/Okg8NQk4inwDuOyrukPC9t7dDYRgDevushw42qxTE0dWx5nw6rVpmchfTiBtf5 vfH0kbVzoBkmXuKnK4IvAfKbs/UwqCOU3iuBCobVCxdJieVdFfbs7Pupf87ZU8QmOpRK ww== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgsjredh8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:19 -0400 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195K7QL0008235; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:19 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgsjredh0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIgKZ012963; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:17 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2ax1pc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:17 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KQEub32506242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:14 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72936AE053; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B7AAE056; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:10 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] powerpc/security: Add a helper to query stf_barrier type Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:24 +0530 Message-Id: <3bd5d7f96ea1547991ac2ce3137dc2b220bae285.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: CNCi-ukBO9UKZPaYXJZPQ7njqrqHw8NW X-Proofpoint-GUID: f7V00wrIsHaCXEmsXqxbh96OPs6wvrVd X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Add a helper to return the stf_barrier type for the current processor. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/security_features.h | 5 +++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/security_features.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/security_features.h index 792eefaf230b80..27574f218b371f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/security_features.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/security_features.h @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ static inline bool security_ftr_enabled(u64 feature) return !!(powerpc_security_features & feature); } +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 +enum stf_barrier_type stf_barrier_type_get(void); +#else +static inline enum stf_barrier_type stf_barrier_type_get(void) { return STF_BARRIER_NONE; } +#endif // Features indicating support for Spectre/Meltdown mitigations diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c index 1a998490fe60f0..15fb5ea1b9eafa 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ static int __init handle_no_stf_barrier(char *p) early_param("no_stf_barrier", handle_no_stf_barrier); +enum stf_barrier_type stf_barrier_type_get(void) +{ + return stf_enabled_flush_types; +} + /* This is the generic flag used by other architectures */ static int __init handle_ssbd(char *p) { From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:25 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536923 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=f8jffFPg; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Nn35YPz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:30:49 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8Nn1sW6z2yWn for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:30:49 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=f8jffFPg; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=f8jffFPg; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8J26BRcz2yw0 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195JfcKv022770; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=K/u0a24jg5LqQ5HhXwS1mY5XUV4ATJMovLjJGeG3f3U=; b=f8jffFPgfD2yzdxRhPaj2NR67dY4h1iOO3tLwFjpiNEJA0EpF3N94ZLTCnNxB9iZwrKw BFxeQIwDsXrcH1UowYsmsKOzsFjoGfoDAG75cqtc5r8ypjMg01mwre7yl4nQWBATu+Io wAo99zSieplLVZZ1RzXIitSMgKifmpBcEpK2P2LyNszP1IDi4x0Qg8mQpi1xYY3kxKiR Yu1x8HFI7SHd4CoOL19lXuF5giHgV1HeeAo17nt83LhdwfwUATcF56NhwcoIYnHJxRbw jLlx4sIX4sl29BXQoiWTFT/dnbTm32Ej6qm5Iz+rQmJrMoPiirGdFZt1GAvbQ3z1Qkrb fw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgw388w15-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:23 -0400 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195KQGxN035877; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:23 -0400 Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgw388w0q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:22 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIntu012511; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:21 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef29kt55-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:21 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KQI3A46072178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:18 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D73EAE04D; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D7BAE053; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:14 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] powerpc/bpf: Emit stf barrier instruction sequences for BPF_NOSPEC Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:25 +0530 Message-Id: <956570cbc191cd41f8274bed48ee757a86dac62a.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: JWksi4a9b5Md0ipJZXFMkM7wbrtBy0fa X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: vRUy4jOc7NrV-9KmKVcNqRloWU-e7fAA X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Emit similar instruction sequences to commit a048a07d7f4535 ("powerpc/64s: Add support for a store forwarding barrier at kernel entry/exit") when encountering BPF_NOSPEC. Mitigations are enabled depending on what the firmware advertises. In particular, we do not gate these mitigations based on current settings, just like in x86. Due to this, we don't need to take any action if mitigations are enabled or disabled at runtime. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h | 8 ++--- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h index 7b713edfa7e261..b63b35e45e558c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h @@ -16,18 +16,18 @@ * with our redzone usage. * * [ prev sp ] <------------- - * [ nv gpr save area ] 6*8 | + * [ nv gpr save area ] 5*8 | * [ tail_call_cnt ] 8 | - * [ local_tmp_var ] 8 | + * [ local_tmp_var ] 16 | * fp (r31) --> [ ebpf stack space ] upto 512 | * [ frame header ] 32/112 | * sp (r1) ---> [ stack pointer ] -------------- */ /* for gpr non volatile registers BPG_REG_6 to 10 */ -#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (6*8) +#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (5*8) /* for bpf JIT code internal usage */ -#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 16 +#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 24 /* stack frame excluding BPF stack, ensure this is quadword aligned */ #define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + \ BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS + BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 6626e6c17d4ed2..51c7f6cd9a0a10 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "bpf_jit64.h" @@ -35,9 +36,9 @@ static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx) * [ prev sp ] <------------- * [ ... ] | * sp (r1) ---> [ stack pointer ] -------------- - * [ nv gpr save area ] 6*8 + * [ nv gpr save area ] 5*8 * [ tail_call_cnt ] 8 - * [ local_tmp_var ] 8 + * [ local_tmp_var ] 16 * [ unused red zone ] 208 bytes protected */ static int bpf_jit_stack_local(struct codegen_context *ctx) @@ -45,12 +46,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_stack_local(struct codegen_context *ctx) if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) return STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size; else - return -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 16); + return -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 24); } static int bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(struct codegen_context *ctx) { - return bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx) + 8; + return bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx) + 16; } static int bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg) @@ -272,10 +273,33 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o return 0; } +/* + * We spill into the redzone always, even if the bpf program has its own stackframe. + * Offsets hardcoded based on BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE -- see bpf_jit_stack_local() + */ +void bpf_stf_barrier(void); + +asm ( +" .global bpf_stf_barrier ;" +" bpf_stf_barrier: ;" +" std 21,-64(1) ;" +" std 22,-56(1) ;" +" sync ;" +" ld 21,-64(1) ;" +" ld 22,-56(1) ;" +" ori 31,31,0 ;" +" .rept 14 ;" +" b 1f ;" +" 1: ;" +" .endr ;" +" blr ;" +); + /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue */ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs, bool extra_pass) { + enum stf_barrier_type stf_barrier = stf_barrier_type_get(); const struct bpf_insn *insn = fp->insnsi; int flen = fp->len; int i, ret; @@ -646,6 +670,29 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * BPF_ST NOSPEC (speculation barrier) */ case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC: + if (!security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_FAVOUR_SECURITY) || + !security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_STF_BARRIER)) + break; + + switch (stf_barrier) { + case STF_BARRIER_EIEIO: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_EIEIO() | 0x02000000); + break; + case STF_BARRIER_SYNC_ORI: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SYNC()); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R13, 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ORI(_R31, _R31, 0)); + break; + case STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + PPC_LI64(12, dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(bpf_stf_barrier)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTLR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + break; + case STF_BARRIER_NONE: + break; + } break; /* From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:26 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536924 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=BCEZdNnj; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Pk2Rhpz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:31:38 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8Pk1174z3c4X for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:31:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=BCEZdNnj; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=BCEZdNnj; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8J533Rjz2yxv for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:45 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195JaMSj008527; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=kplCmVJPBNtiZEGwwh71wHlt+GclXYm96k5TjH79J54=; b=BCEZdNnjfbSc8RLjxExr1xtcX2AMgd3tabyUe0i+w6v2aYJSng1npiTAJv/tZKXj0jiQ DvKWzt45x2TcmNqIM95AqgU2AuDwdM0uvYAd1IGcOj7DPmx36oY3TDFGTooKrbZIgBwW OtFciTe45JCAPgiZCmA0jCKI83FUJMO2b/RXFWahkAr5GJBvA5+G1auQQFYvEW1p13gf dN2XjCzzuvgrCWeopub7siB70v6VLho39DHsJUKYxfi/55fY2jUW3r5esZZzFheABXbz QLI0OwY8ZX3dFE8O6BfNWKy+Aus+TDdP0t86wTjD0329sWqin6yF68DN2nqqChihn0MA aA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgvgpstuv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:27 -0400 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195JhUDM009563; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:26 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgvgpstue-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:26 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KHDIR022148; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:25 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2a61h6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:24 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KL2r952232460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:21:02 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ECFAE04D; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA81DAE051; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:18 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 07/10] powerpc/bpf ppc32: Fix ALU32 BPF_ARSH operation Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:26 +0530 Message-Id: <6d24c1f9e79b6f61f5135eaf2ea1e8bcd4dac87b.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 94slfGO7h7pzZQhnOJLS-cSUtgfmeEaw X-Proofpoint-GUID: Q-tjRdWMFFuhPujVa3T90dxlKXHOYi0i X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Correct the destination register used for ALU32 BPF_ARSH operation. Fixes: 51c66ad849a703 ("powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index a74d52204f8da2..519ecb9ab67266 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg_h, 0)); break; case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X: /* (s32) dst >>= src */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_SRAW(dst_reg_h, dst_reg, src_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SRAW(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); break; case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X: /* (s64) dst >>= src */ bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg); From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:27 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536926 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=fRq/Zmv/; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8QW24ZPz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:32:19 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8QW0YYbz3cnB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:32:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=fRq/Zmv/; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=fRq/Zmv/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8JH6XWBz305Z for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:55 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195K6DrS024332; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=spjo/ZTMWm3ba1faiLvmzEY9+vASsmV2fLnJUa6bvGM=; b=fRq/Zmv/K2HfVLAie8n4bRtniO71Rb3wmDTst1vpB59lMZsEjFpWBMtjPOvx8PbSUzZU jV2o5Lk/POSpcZ0KzjMkg3KpFx3B0NWfa/ROGsJSnrVnEMns6mh5pW2rt2wIA5sAreL6 8mA6kraxbiKcJn/MsSW03dcXPstwrNMGRIU47A++0pqdhrDuY3oAsoBp/7O1pIiJZ7rE vUtNynugUwo6HnDXqzpYLA+XYTbrhrWKaJuDPuvDQaFpNpE0c7S/5NHjsKZV8rNymPqI Qb/Qjqt7WjFf4//b2O+DKgzDSazcYtQkp/UQlIG4oPLhdLfmQWBtBqNe8v3yySnPHWFT OQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgrpkf9fj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:31 -0400 Received: from m0098393.ppops.net (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195K7tJ7029359; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:31 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgrpkf9es-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIgKd012963; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:28 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2ax1qd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:28 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KQQ9r39584056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:26 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394F4AE045; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8746AE058; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:22 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] powerpc/bpf ppc32: Fix JMP32_JSET_K Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:27 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: qcCvMgW-hM8w19HAvotSv5VL3jNJ7MJI X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: rJJrQq6I2QWj-A7Vnxrome7EFaryljy8 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" 'andi' only takes an unsigned 16-bit value. Correct the imm range used when emitting andi. Fixes: 51c66ad849a703 ("powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 519ecb9ab67266..7c65de9ed4fa64 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * break; case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_K: /* andi does not sign-extend the immediate */ - if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) { + if (imm >= 0 && imm < 32768) { /* PPC_ANDI is _only/always_ dot-form */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ANDI(_R0, dst_reg, imm)); } else { From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:28 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536928 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LL1mtsvS; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8S71MF0z9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:33:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8S659Ndz3cN2 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:33:42 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LL1mtsvS; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LL1mtsvS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Jg4HMmz3bWq for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:27:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195JaMaV008528; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=cEBd0rRKrwX5Xm+40An6D0lsc77GM2bw/ksyLqF5hcg=; b=LL1mtsvSBJywWnFwZ0aRQuQKiJxxMANn0mrg/Sr5O2lID7lXSRtS5IlNICx1CihdCa67 QOLg7J+FwzUFVG77FnbZuzhXOLkHySeVFeLx7t82Belg1acNCNeEMt9Zkzr1xMDv4ACz gB30CEgvIci82fEMU85JjiCPA8MfbVSkgmtT6/eLo8mYOv99BpI/KvKdvpyKpCNRq2WR IleHC4HDdvaIc36+28A6Gvrc5GK+8+VI7M/CGBa3y7XMohJoSifxMIqNjCdBOCDcSTP9 k0KbbPaGqRZkpYiTN3ld2eQAelQVkYe9fZpbOqmUk6MyRoZu1N12CEcbSaCNkyGAdkxa lQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgvgpstwr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:35 -0400 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195KK3JV003499; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:34 -0400 Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgvgpstwa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIfEt024942; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:33 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2a3rdq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:32 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KLCeQ61538762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:21:12 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28395AE045; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B755DAE051; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:26 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] powerpc/bpf ppc32: Do not emit zero extend instruction for 64-bit BPF_END Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:28 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RTxDfzNweyCkI_1roq1iaGgzDowTOHIr X-Proofpoint-GUID: BqlRp2GTMF-cKFiZj8cF9A0NHbk8chjH X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Suppress emitting zero extend instruction for 64-bit BPF_END_FROM_[L|B]E operation. Fixes: 51c66ad849a703 ("powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 7c65de9ed4fa64..68dc8a8231de04 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * return -EOPNOTSUPP; } if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU && !fp->aux->verifier_zext && - !insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1])) + !insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1]) && !(BPF_OP(code) == BPF_END && imm == 64)) EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg_h, 0)); } From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:29 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536927 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qU1ypXIm; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8RK4MsJz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:33:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8RK2xY2z3cJy for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:33:01 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qU1ypXIm; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qU1ypXIm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8JN62FSz307L for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:27:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195K4TwE006938; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=mHZM+8sfCvSOETZtZksE+aG+w8FMfYUNC7iEu3POcOI=; b=qU1ypXImbecAlvSLctqt1Db5fPnhPR+lqK4vL3k+vjwL8mbezEcV6YSgBIFQlx8ugtxt ourEgg0jV3j99itHu4hx3C26mpDaRpO99ZzxFSShbZO7d3P5Qf+MgZMIhcyAiCL2lJMI pi6KmXDBKzkdYUR50ydzj2fsg/TA7txPNdF53nNDyH68MFU4jFhjHmCO4Ijw5N0v9L8s uRYSQz6vP1WCJqdh3kd1SWGRE6PuSkFlxwlH0t/eM+x/Ocpj0WHKsvEASK/qR/82MtTU ggp59e9gAZWXYM1J/uw46H7vCPxyV/DK6PX68YuUW4QhagWB+pYaqEF9PPogVDFdU7kK 4A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgs36y44s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195KKS0R002966; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgs36y43y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIn4K013018; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:36 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2ax1r7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:36 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KQYHo6357536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:34 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DC1AE04D; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61DDAE053; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:30 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] powerpc/bpf ppc32: Fix BPF_SUB when imm == 0x80000000 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:29 +0530 Message-Id: <7135360a0cdf70adedbccf9863128b8daef18764.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: RZ0L1NcKFxcU4p3k6fmtrbcmFvv_Vfm- X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: t7YJsAiuSAtcp-GB4HaMGRnT0o7QiUqs X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Special case handling of the smallest 32-bit negative number for BPF_SUB. Fixes: 51c66ad849a703 ("powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 68dc8a8231de04..0da31d41d41310 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * PPC_LI32(_R0, imm); EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDC(dst_reg, dst_reg, _R0)); } - if (imm >= 0) + if (imm >= 0 || (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_SUB && imm == 0x80000000)) EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDZE(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h)); else EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDME(dst_reg_h, dst_reg_h));