From patchwork Fri Jan 19 15:41:37 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joseph Salisbury X-Patchwork-Id: 863611 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zNQ6f6SlKz9s7g; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 02:41:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecYnX-00055T-3E; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:41:43 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecYnT-00054B-UM for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:41:39 +0000 Received: from 1.general.jsalisbury.us.vpn ([10.172.67.212] helo=salisbury) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ecYnT-0003bz-KU for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:41:39 +0000 Received: by salisbury (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D5A67E0921; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:41:38 -0500 (EST) From: Joseph Salisbury To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [SRU][Artful][Bionic][PATCH 1/2] x86 / CPU: Avoid unnecessary IPIs in arch_freq_get_on_cpu() Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:41:37 -0500 Message-Id: <210207c8ef9479b2120770edef2dbcc9bf17d3fe.1516209181.git.joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743269 Even though aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() caches the samples.khz value to return if called again in a sufficiently short time, its caller, arch_freq_get_on_cpu(), still uses smp_call_function_single() to run it which may allow user space to trigger an IPI storm by reading from the scaling_cur_freq cpufreq sysfs file in a tight loop. To avoid that, move the decision on whether or not to return the cached samples.khz value to arch_freq_get_on_cpu(). This change was part of commit 941f5f0f6ef5 ("x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo"), but it was not the reason for the revert and it remains applicable. Fixes: 4815d3c56d1e (cpufreq: x86: Make scaling_cur_freq behave more as expected) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: WANG Chao Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds (cherry picked from commit b29c6ef7bb1257853c1e31616d84f55e561cf631) Signed-off-by: Joseph Salisbury --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c index 0ee8332..957813e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c @@ -42,10 +42,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time); unsigned long flags; - /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ - if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) - return; - local_irq_save(flags); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf); @@ -74,6 +70,7 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) { + s64 time_delta; unsigned int khz; if (!cpu_khz) @@ -82,6 +79,12 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)) return 0; + /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ + time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu)); + khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); + if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) + return khz; + smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1); khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); if (khz) From patchwork Fri Jan 19 15:41:38 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joseph Salisbury X-Patchwork-Id: 863612 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zNQ6f4fYJz9s7f; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 02:41:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecYnV-00054k-PL; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:41:41 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecYnU-00054D-1W for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:41:40 +0000 Received: from 1.general.jsalisbury.us.vpn ([10.172.67.212] helo=salisbury) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ecYnT-0003c0-KX for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:41:39 +0000 Received: by salisbury (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9EDED7E2657; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:41:38 -0500 (EST) From: Joseph Salisbury To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [SRU][Artful][Bionic][PATCH 2/2] x86 / CPU: Always show current CPU frequency in /proc/cpuinfo Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:41:38 -0500 Message-Id: <55bb9bbee59c82fb25a9db94273749c106fca4e2.1516209181.git.joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743269 After commit 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"") the "cpu MHz" number in /proc/cpuinfo on x86 can be either the nominal CPU frequency (which is constant) or the frequency most recently requested by a scaling governor in cpufreq, depending on the cpufreq configuration. That is somewhat inconsistent and is different from what it was before 4.13, so in order to restore the previous behavior, make it report the current CPU frequency like the scaling_cur_freq sysfs file in cpufreq. To that end, modify the /proc/cpuinfo implementation on x86 to use aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() to snapshot the APERF and MPERF feedback registers, if available, and use their values to compute the CPU frequency to be reported as "cpu MHz". However, do that carefully enough to avoid accumulating delays that lead to unacceptable access times for /proc/cpuinfo on systems with many CPUs. Run aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() once on all CPUs asynchronously at the /proc/cpuinfo open time, add a single delay upfront (if necessary) at that point and simply compute the current frequency while running show_cpuinfo() for each individual CPU. Also, to avoid slowing down /proc/cpuinfo accesses too much, reduce the default delay between consecutive APERF and MPERF reads to 10 ms, which should be sufficient to get large enough numbers for the frequency computation in all cases. Fixes: 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Ingo Molnar (back ported from commit 7d5905dc14a87805a59f3c5bf70173aac2bb18f8) Signed-off-by: Joseph Salisbury --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h | 3 ++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 6 +++- fs/proc/cpuinfo.c | 6 ++++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile index de260fa..eb74f3b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ obj-y += common.o obj-y += rdrand.o obj-y += match.o obj-y += bugs.o -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += aperfmperf.o +obj-y += aperfmperf.o obj-y += cpuid-deps.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c index 957813e..7eba34d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ #include #include +#include "cpu.h" + struct aperfmperf_sample { unsigned int khz; ktime_t time; @@ -24,7 +26,7 @@ struct aperfmperf_sample { static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct aperfmperf_sample, samples); #define APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS 10 -#define APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS 20 +#define APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS 10 #define APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS 1000 /* @@ -38,8 +40,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) u64 aperf, aperf_delta; u64 mperf, mperf_delta; struct aperfmperf_sample *s = this_cpu_ptr(&samples); - ktime_t now = ktime_get(); - s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time); unsigned long flags; local_irq_save(flags); @@ -57,38 +57,68 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) if (mperf_delta == 0) return; - s->time = now; + s->time = ktime_get(); s->aperf = aperf; s->mperf = mperf; - - /* If the previous iteration was too long ago, discard it. */ - if (time_delta > APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS) - s->khz = 0; - else - s->khz = div64_u64((cpu_khz * aperf_delta), mperf_delta); + s->khz = div64_u64((cpu_khz * aperf_delta), mperf_delta); } -unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) +static bool aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(int cpu, ktime_t now, bool wait) { - s64 time_delta; - unsigned int khz; + s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, per_cpu(samples.time, cpu)); + + /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ + if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) + return true; + + smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, wait); + + /* Return false if the previous iteration was too long ago. */ + return time_delta <= APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS; +} +unsigned int aperfmperf_get_khz(int cpu) +{ if (!cpu_khz) return 0; if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)) return 0; - /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */ - time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu)); - khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); - if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS) - return khz; + aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, ktime_get(), true); + return per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); +} - smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1); - khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); - if (khz) - return khz; +void arch_freq_prepare_all(void) +{ + ktime_t now = ktime_get(); + bool wait = false; + int cpu; + + if (!cpu_khz) + return; + + if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)) + return; + + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) + if (!aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, now, false)) + wait = true; + + if (wait) + msleep(APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS); +} + +unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) +{ + if (!cpu_khz) + return 0; + + if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)) + return 0; + + if (aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, ktime_get(), true)) + return per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); msleep(APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS); smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h index 2584265..6fb25f5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h @@ -46,4 +46,7 @@ extern const struct cpu_dev *const __x86_cpu_dev_start[], extern void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); extern void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); + +unsigned int aperfmperf_get_khz(int cpu); + #endif /* ARCH_X86_CPU_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c index 6df621a..6de0ace 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ #include #include +#include "cpu.h" + /* * Get CPU information for use by the procfs. */ @@ -77,9 +79,11 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode); if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) { - unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu); + unsigned int freq = aperfmperf_get_khz(cpu); if (!freq) + freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu); + if (!freq) freq = cpu_khz; seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n", freq / 1000, (freq % 1000)); diff --git a/fs/proc/cpuinfo.c b/fs/proc/cpuinfo.c index 06f4d31..3dd44c8 100644 --- a/fs/proc/cpuinfo.c +++ b/fs/proc/cpuinfo.c @@ -1,11 +1,17 @@ +#include #include #include #include #include +__weak void arch_freq_prepare_all(void) +{ +} + extern const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op; static int cpuinfo_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { + arch_freq_prepare_all(); return seq_open(file, &cpuinfo_op); } diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index f10a9b3..339f967 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -897,6 +897,7 @@ static inline bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } #endif +extern void arch_freq_prepare_all(void); extern unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu); /* the following are really really optional */