From patchwork Fri Mar 12 11:06:38 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: He Ying X-Patchwork-Id: 1452450 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dy60T3jfHz9sRf for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:22:49 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dy60T2hbDz3d9q for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:22:49 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.191; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com; envelope-from=heying24@huawei.com; receiver=) X-Greylist: delayed 1079 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 22:25:16 AEDT Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dxk4r218fz30LC for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 22:25:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Dxjd43zWqzNlqW; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:04:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.47) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:06:51 +0800 From: He Ying To: , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: define the variable 'uaccess_flush' as static Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:06:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20210312110638.178974-1-heying24@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.47] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:22:35 +1100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: johnny.chenyi@huawei.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The variable 'uaccess_fulsh' is not referenced outside the file. Perhaps we should define it as static to avoid the warning as follows: arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c:953:6: warning: symbol 'uaccess_flush' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: He Ying --- arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c index 560ed8b975e7..22aca271496b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ static bool no_entry_flush; static bool no_uaccess_flush; bool rfi_flush; bool entry_flush; -bool uaccess_flush; +static bool uaccess_flush; DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(uaccess_flush_key); EXPORT_SYMBOL(uaccess_flush_key);