From patchwork Wed Feb 12 11:25:10 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 1236793 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=gqCKHjQK; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48HcgR5N69z9sRt for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:22:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725821AbgBLLVx (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:21:53 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:48446 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727264AbgBLLVx (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:21:53 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLjfF021371; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:45 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1581506505; bh=NSN1PR6BbRLEFJcGl71r2ydoe9MEFXsXvNsWp5yET48=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=gqCKHjQKFH1V1FAVd31oCPTvbrMpxospAZV3bOKK7MMjx9UTAS536GYJYlC+PJuEk HeLKPvxCj33t/xI8Xx4EkrM4EeNct8MbOe73t2vveqXwaCVLNJZhlyTg6tobLlqnGN VioKKupNhq+Tz3mEaR6AcHmPTOqfGy0ykuSUxQfk= Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (dlee101.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.31]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLjIa078512; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:45 -0600 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:44 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:44 -0600 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLc5X049841; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:42 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Murray , Vidya Sagar , Athani Nadeem Ladkhan , Tom Joseph CC: , , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: endpoint: Use notification chain mechanism to notify EPC events to EPF Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:55:10 +0530 Message-ID: <20200212112514.2000-2-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Use atomic_notifier_call_chain() to notify EPC events like linkup to EPF driver instead of using linkup ops in EPF driver. This is in preparation for adding proper locking mechanism to EPF ops. This will also enable to add more events (in addition to linkup) in the future. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Tested-by: Vidya Sagar --- drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 13 ++++++++--- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 9 ++------ drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 22 +------------------ include/linux/pci-epc.h | 8 +++++++ include/linux/pci-epf.h | 6 ++--- 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c index 5d74f81ddfe4..bddff15052cc 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c @@ -360,12 +360,16 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work) msecs_to_jiffies(1)); } -static void pci_epf_test_linkup(struct pci_epf *epf) +static int pci_epf_test_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, + void *data) { + struct pci_epf *epf = container_of(nb, struct pci_epf, nb); struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf); queue_delayed_work(kpcitest_workqueue, &epf_test->cmd_handler, msecs_to_jiffies(1)); + + return NOTIFY_OK; } static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf) @@ -546,8 +550,12 @@ static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) } } - if (!linkup_notifier) + if (linkup_notifier) { + epf->nb.notifier_call = pci_epf_test_notifier; + pci_epc_register_notifier(epc, &epf->nb); + } else { queue_work(kpcitest_workqueue, &epf_test->cmd_handler.work); + } return 0; } @@ -580,7 +588,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_probe(struct pci_epf *epf) static struct pci_epf_ops ops = { .unbind = pci_epf_test_unbind, .bind = pci_epf_test_bind, - .linkup = pci_epf_test_linkup, }; static struct pci_epf_driver test_driver = { diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c index 2091508c1620..2f6436599fcb 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c @@ -539,16 +539,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_remove_epf); */ void pci_epc_linkup(struct pci_epc *epc) { - unsigned long flags; - struct pci_epf *epf; - if (!epc || IS_ERR(epc)) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); - list_for_each_entry(epf, &epc->pci_epf, list) - pci_epf_linkup(epf); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&epc->notifier, 0, NULL); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_linkup); @@ -612,6 +606,7 @@ __pci_epc_create(struct device *dev, const struct pci_epc_ops *ops, spin_lock_init(&epc->lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epc->pci_epf); + ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&epc->notifier); device_initialize(&epc->dev); epc->dev.class = pci_epc_class; diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c index fb1306de8f40..93f28c65ace0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c @@ -20,26 +20,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_epf_mutex); static struct bus_type pci_epf_bus_type; static const struct device_type pci_epf_type; -/** - * pci_epf_linkup() - Notify the function driver that EPC device has - * established a connection with the Root Complex. - * @epf: the EPF device bound to the EPC device which has established - * the connection with the host - * - * Invoke to notify the function driver that EPC device has established - * a connection with the Root Complex. - */ -void pci_epf_linkup(struct pci_epf *epf) -{ - if (!epf->driver) { - dev_WARN(&epf->dev, "epf device not bound to driver\n"); - return; - } - - epf->driver->ops->linkup(epf); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epf_linkup); - /** * pci_epf_unbind() - Notify the function driver that the binding between the * EPF device and EPC device has been lost @@ -214,7 +194,7 @@ int __pci_epf_register_driver(struct pci_epf_driver *driver, if (!driver->ops) return -EINVAL; - if (!driver->ops->bind || !driver->ops->unbind || !driver->ops->linkup) + if (!driver->ops->bind || !driver->ops->unbind) return -EINVAL; driver->driver.bus = &pci_epf_bus_type; diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epc.h b/include/linux/pci-epc.h index 56f1846b9d39..36644ccd32ac 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epc.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epc.h @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct pci_epc_mem { * @max_functions: max number of functions that can be configured in this EPC * @group: configfs group representing the PCI EPC device * @lock: spinlock to protect pci_epc ops + * @notifier: used to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup) */ struct pci_epc { struct device dev; @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ struct pci_epc { struct config_group *group; /* spinlock to protect against concurrent access of EP controller */ spinlock_t lock; + struct atomic_notifier_head notifier; }; /** @@ -141,6 +143,12 @@ static inline void *epc_get_drvdata(struct pci_epc *epc) return dev_get_drvdata(&epc->dev); } +static inline int +pci_epc_register_notifier(struct pci_epc *epc, struct notifier_block *nb) +{ + return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&epc->notifier, nb); +} + struct pci_epc * __devm_pci_epc_create(struct device *dev, const struct pci_epc_ops *ops, struct module *owner); diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epf.h b/include/linux/pci-epf.h index 2d6f07556682..4993f7f6439b 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epf.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epf.h @@ -55,13 +55,10 @@ struct pci_epf_header { * @bind: ops to perform when a EPC device has been bound to EPF device * @unbind: ops to perform when a binding has been lost between a EPC device * and EPF device - * @linkup: ops to perform when the EPC device has established a connection with - * a host system */ struct pci_epf_ops { int (*bind)(struct pci_epf *epf); void (*unbind)(struct pci_epf *epf); - void (*linkup)(struct pci_epf *epf); }; /** @@ -112,6 +109,7 @@ struct pci_epf_bar { * @epc: the EPC device to which this EPF device is bound * @driver: the EPF driver to which this EPF device is bound * @list: to add pci_epf as a list of PCI endpoint functions to pci_epc + * @nb: notifier block to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup) */ struct pci_epf { struct device dev; @@ -125,6 +123,7 @@ struct pci_epf { struct pci_epc *epc; struct pci_epf_driver *driver; struct list_head list; + struct notifier_block nb; }; #define to_pci_epf(epf_dev) container_of((epf_dev), struct pci_epf, dev) @@ -154,5 +153,4 @@ void *pci_epf_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf, size_t size, enum pci_barno bar, void pci_epf_free_space(struct pci_epf *epf, void *addr, enum pci_barno bar); int pci_epf_bind(struct pci_epf *epf); void pci_epf_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf); -void pci_epf_linkup(struct pci_epf *epf); #endif /* __LINUX_PCI_EPF_H */ From patchwork Wed Feb 12 11:25:11 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 1236792 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=XwJpf1ca; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48HcgQ3ytkz9sSP for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:22:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728043AbgBLLV4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:21:56 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:56630 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727264AbgBLLVz (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:21:55 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLmOD065869; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:48 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1581506508; bh=YwWboun219hl2JViX7Q/BOoaisYf+ToKJpMH3k4a83U=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=XwJpf1cafM878qBmpgXeEi24u+/wYC8g0n+7Kmf2K9w58gDMYJ+YZjk05c2PKcG6J EdvxlEb+H3p4cIlfTXN6f88HzbaxCzDjTUaEqffqL/xCKxMw2/wekAwuX8g/LkVx1N ACDi6NlA1/0IZZ7Xf/bd41kqtBdEXThwcdKMsj9k= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLmKk078547; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:48 -0600 Received: from DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:48 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:48 -0600 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLc5Y049841; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:45 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Murray , Vidya Sagar , Athani Nadeem Ladkhan , Tom Joseph CC: , , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: endpoint: Replace spinlock with mutex Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:55:11 +0530 Message-ID: <20200212112514.2000-3-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org The pci_epc_ops is not intended to be invoked from interrupt context. Hence replace spin_lock_irqsave and spin_unlock_irqrestore with mutex_lock and mutex_unlock respectively. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 82 +++++++++++------------------ include/linux/pci-epc.h | 6 +-- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c index 2f6436599fcb..e51a12ed85bb 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c @@ -120,7 +120,6 @@ const struct pci_epc_features *pci_epc_get_features(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no) { const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) return NULL; @@ -128,9 +127,9 @@ const struct pci_epc_features *pci_epc_get_features(struct pci_epc *epc, if (!epc->ops->get_features) return NULL; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); epc_features = epc->ops->get_features(epc, func_no); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return epc_features; } @@ -144,14 +143,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_get_features); */ void pci_epc_stop(struct pci_epc *epc) { - unsigned long flags; - if (IS_ERR(epc) || !epc->ops->stop) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); epc->ops->stop(epc); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_stop); @@ -164,7 +161,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_stop); int pci_epc_start(struct pci_epc *epc) { int ret; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR(epc)) return -EINVAL; @@ -172,9 +168,9 @@ int pci_epc_start(struct pci_epc *epc) if (!epc->ops->start) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); ret = epc->ops->start(epc); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return ret; } @@ -193,7 +189,6 @@ int pci_epc_raise_irq(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u16 interrupt_num) { int ret; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) return -EINVAL; @@ -201,9 +196,9 @@ int pci_epc_raise_irq(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, if (!epc->ops->raise_irq) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); ret = epc->ops->raise_irq(epc, func_no, type, interrupt_num); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return ret; } @@ -219,7 +214,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_raise_irq); int pci_epc_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no) { int interrupt; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) return 0; @@ -227,9 +221,9 @@ int pci_epc_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no) if (!epc->ops->get_msi) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); interrupt = epc->ops->get_msi(epc, func_no); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); if (interrupt < 0) return 0; @@ -252,7 +246,6 @@ int pci_epc_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 interrupts) { int ret; u8 encode_int; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions || interrupts > 32) @@ -263,9 +256,9 @@ int pci_epc_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 interrupts) encode_int = order_base_2(interrupts); - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); ret = epc->ops->set_msi(epc, func_no, encode_int); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return ret; } @@ -281,7 +274,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_set_msi); int pci_epc_get_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no) { int interrupt; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) return 0; @@ -289,9 +281,9 @@ int pci_epc_get_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no) if (!epc->ops->get_msix) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); interrupt = epc->ops->get_msix(epc, func_no); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); if (interrupt < 0) return 0; @@ -311,7 +303,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_get_msix); int pci_epc_set_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u16 interrupts) { int ret; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions || interrupts < 1 || interrupts > 2048) @@ -320,9 +311,9 @@ int pci_epc_set_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u16 interrupts) if (!epc->ops->set_msix) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); ret = epc->ops->set_msix(epc, func_no, interrupts - 1); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return ret; } @@ -339,17 +330,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_set_msix); void pci_epc_unmap_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, phys_addr_t phys_addr) { - unsigned long flags; - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) return; if (!epc->ops->unmap_addr) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); epc->ops->unmap_addr(epc, func_no, phys_addr); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_unmap_addr); @@ -367,7 +356,6 @@ int pci_epc_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, phys_addr_t phys_addr, u64 pci_addr, size_t size) { int ret; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) return -EINVAL; @@ -375,9 +363,9 @@ int pci_epc_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, if (!epc->ops->map_addr) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); ret = epc->ops->map_addr(epc, func_no, phys_addr, pci_addr, size); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return ret; } @@ -394,8 +382,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_map_addr); void pci_epc_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar) { - unsigned long flags; - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions || (epf_bar->barno == BAR_5 && epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)) @@ -404,9 +390,9 @@ void pci_epc_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, if (!epc->ops->clear_bar) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); epc->ops->clear_bar(epc, func_no, epf_bar); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_clear_bar); @@ -422,7 +408,6 @@ int pci_epc_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar) { int ret; - unsigned long irq_flags; int flags = epf_bar->flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions || @@ -437,9 +422,9 @@ int pci_epc_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, if (!epc->ops->set_bar) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, irq_flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); ret = epc->ops->set_bar(epc, func_no, epf_bar); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, irq_flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return ret; } @@ -460,7 +445,6 @@ int pci_epc_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, struct pci_epf_header *header) { int ret; - unsigned long flags; if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) return -EINVAL; @@ -468,9 +452,9 @@ int pci_epc_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, if (!epc->ops->write_header) return 0; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); ret = epc->ops->write_header(epc, func_no, header); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return ret; } @@ -487,8 +471,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_write_header); */ int pci_epc_add_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf) { - unsigned long flags; - if (epf->epc) return -EBUSY; @@ -500,9 +482,9 @@ int pci_epc_add_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf) epf->epc = epc; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); list_add_tail(&epf->list, &epc->pci_epf); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); return 0; } @@ -517,15 +499,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_add_epf); */ void pci_epc_remove_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf) { - unsigned long flags; - if (!epc || IS_ERR(epc) || !epf) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); list_del(&epf->list); epf->epc = NULL; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_remove_epf); @@ -604,7 +584,7 @@ __pci_epc_create(struct device *dev, const struct pci_epc_ops *ops, goto err_ret; } - spin_lock_init(&epc->lock); + mutex_init(&epc->lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epc->pci_epf); ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&epc->notifier); diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epc.h b/include/linux/pci-epc.h index 36644ccd32ac..9dd60f2e9705 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epc.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epc.h @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ struct pci_epc_mem { * @mem: address space of the endpoint controller * @max_functions: max number of functions that can be configured in this EPC * @group: configfs group representing the PCI EPC device - * @lock: spinlock to protect pci_epc ops + * @lock: mutex to protect pci_epc ops * @notifier: used to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup) */ struct pci_epc { @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ struct pci_epc { struct pci_epc_mem *mem; u8 max_functions; struct config_group *group; - /* spinlock to protect against concurrent access of EP controller */ - spinlock_t lock; + /* mutex to protect against concurrent access of EP controller */ + struct mutex lock; struct atomic_notifier_head notifier; }; From patchwork Wed Feb 12 11:25:12 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 1236787 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=FIQ+g8mx; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Hcg42MyDz9sRp for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:22:08 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728287AbgBLLWG (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:22:06 -0500 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:59958 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726135AbgBLLWF (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:22:05 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLptt023254; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:51 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1581506511; bh=irXm3n0Br626t+Byi041gd8ETS1z2r1vmrQt2s1wqxw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=FIQ+g8mxDGB7ja+P/VTDmdpabW4bqxs5fgWyvW4ZWk6QV7GT5n/BsgRD5NX6AMb79 9lyKsEBuYJzGcLZPVExFi9yKqu0v/Hq92Qw+rsZ9CiDwIDDqF1/4PtVukFqeyX942k 95nzIw9gcrBDv+lxV2q1n2a3eeIyY9geoeljf91k= Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (dlee103.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.33]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLpmM078572; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:51 -0600 Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:51 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:51 -0600 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLc5Z049841; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:48 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Murray , Vidya Sagar , Athani Nadeem Ladkhan , Tom Joseph CC: , , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: endpoint: Protect concurrent access to memory allocation with mutex Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:55:12 +0530 Message-ID: <20200212112514.2000-4-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org pci-epc-mem uses bitmap to manage the PCI address region. This address region will be shared by multiple endpoint functions (in the case of multi function endpoint) and it has to be protected from concurrent access to avoid updating inconsistent state. Use mutex to protect while updating bitmap. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-mem.c | 10 ++++++++-- include/linux/pci-epc.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-mem.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-mem.c index d2b174ce15de..abfac1109a13 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-mem.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-mem.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ int __pci_epc_mem_init(struct pci_epc *epc, phys_addr_t phys_base, size_t size, mem->page_size = page_size; mem->pages = pages; mem->size = size; + mutex_init(&mem->lock); epc->mem = mem; @@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_epc_mem_alloc_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, phys_addr_t *phys_addr, size_t size) { int pageno; - void __iomem *virt_addr; + void __iomem *virt_addr = NULL; struct pci_epc_mem *mem = epc->mem; unsigned int page_shift = ilog2(mem->page_size); int order; @@ -130,15 +131,18 @@ void __iomem *pci_epc_mem_alloc_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, size = ALIGN(size, mem->page_size); order = pci_epc_mem_get_order(mem, size); + mutex_lock(&mem->lock); pageno = bitmap_find_free_region(mem->bitmap, mem->pages, order); if (pageno < 0) - return NULL; + goto ret; *phys_addr = mem->phys_base + ((phys_addr_t)pageno << page_shift); virt_addr = ioremap(*phys_addr, size); if (!virt_addr) bitmap_release_region(mem->bitmap, pageno, order); +ret: + mutex_unlock(&mem->lock); return virt_addr; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_mem_alloc_addr); @@ -164,7 +168,9 @@ void pci_epc_mem_free_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, phys_addr_t phys_addr, pageno = (phys_addr - mem->phys_base) >> page_shift; size = ALIGN(size, mem->page_size); order = pci_epc_mem_get_order(mem, size); + mutex_lock(&mem->lock); bitmap_release_region(mem->bitmap, pageno, order); + mutex_unlock(&mem->lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_mem_free_addr); diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epc.h b/include/linux/pci-epc.h index 9dd60f2e9705..4e3e527c49d1 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epc.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epc.h @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct pci_epc_ops { * @bitmap: bitmap to manage the PCI address space * @pages: number of bits representing the address region * @page_size: size of each page + * @lock: mutex to protect bitmap */ struct pci_epc_mem { phys_addr_t phys_base; @@ -78,6 +79,8 @@ struct pci_epc_mem { unsigned long *bitmap; size_t page_size; int pages; + /* mutex to protect against concurrent access for memory allocation*/ + struct mutex lock; }; /** From patchwork Wed Feb 12 11:25:13 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 1236790 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=nSY1jsqj; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48HcgM580sz9sSD for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:22:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727429AbgBLLWT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:22:19 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:56652 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727347AbgBLLWB (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:22:01 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLshx065881; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:54 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1581506514; bh=oIzF4wPqwNRg9UTf2H8Siu9HoiPwFp65VY06zJhiVqk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=nSY1jsqjHa2Qgw0k6K8Ez7NsKHKzWMZWRpiVV53kejmOM5/PEzVRrAROGp1AexVkU ZQ444/s2dF/68W3J2f6lUNjNSbwqYLsX+aQvP+QmATYHlCB6+z2k5DnMoH8kUUxHfX pMLcq+XAI1QOlKB86ImppIsjLRYdM7nb8TEjJfnM= Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (dfle105.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.26]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01CBLs17059868 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:54 -0600 Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:54 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:54 -0600 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLc5a049841; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:51 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Murray , Vidya Sagar , Athani Nadeem Ladkhan , Tom Joseph CC: , , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: endpoint: Protect concurrent access to pci_epf_ops with mutex Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:55:13 +0530 Message-ID: <20200212112514.2000-5-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Protect concurrent access to pci_epf_ops with mutex. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 11 ++++++++++- include/linux/pci-epf.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c index 93f28c65ace0..6e0648991b5c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c @@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ void pci_epf_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf) return; } + mutex_lock(&epf->lock); epf->driver->ops->unbind(epf); + mutex_unlock(&epf->lock); module_put(epf->driver->owner); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epf_unbind); @@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epf_unbind); */ int pci_epf_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) { + int ret; + if (!epf->driver) { dev_WARN(&epf->dev, "epf device not bound to driver\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -57,7 +61,11 @@ int pci_epf_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) if (!try_module_get(epf->driver->owner)) return -EAGAIN; - return epf->driver->ops->bind(epf); + mutex_lock(&epf->lock); + ret = epf->driver->ops->bind(epf); + mutex_unlock(&epf->lock); + + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epf_bind); @@ -252,6 +260,7 @@ struct pci_epf *pci_epf_create(const char *name) device_initialize(dev); dev->bus = &pci_epf_bus_type; dev->type = &pci_epf_type; + mutex_init(&epf->lock); ret = dev_set_name(dev, "%s", name); if (ret) { diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epf.h b/include/linux/pci-epf.h index 4993f7f6439b..bcdf4f07bde7 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epf.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epf.h @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct pci_epf_bar { * @driver: the EPF driver to which this EPF device is bound * @list: to add pci_epf as a list of PCI endpoint functions to pci_epc * @nb: notifier block to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup) + * @lock: mutex to protect pci_epf_ops */ struct pci_epf { struct device dev; @@ -124,6 +125,8 @@ struct pci_epf { struct pci_epf_driver *driver; struct list_head list; struct notifier_block nb; + /* mutex to protect against concurrent access of pci_epf_ops */ + struct mutex lock; }; #define to_pci_epf(epf_dev) container_of((epf_dev), struct pci_epf, dev) From patchwork Wed Feb 12 11:25:14 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 1236788 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=sCaAqDj2; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48HcgF091Rz9sS9 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:22:17 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728334AbgBLLWM (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:22:12 -0500 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:51802 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728315AbgBLLWL (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:22:11 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLvGN014361; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:57 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1581506517; bh=LAHbe1ep18MRMLKppKExizKw+8T2sbESWHHKJMLTnvs=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=sCaAqDj2+59ftqzv0t66V8M3cHSXhnCnXnMfmhnOhOD0SnTx2ejUnoePSJ87Z7AcV 66MqYyfeLQhDS4NFUOfzjkHDJqKgjI8I2GSgskNDzIWjL2l/VSMfqUi5/4QCdkIQmp ziXGgYyxU+ZUdb2stNJoc7hZc8yEfLb75gXqVcSo= Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (dfle102.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.23]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01CBLv5F113060 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:57 -0600 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:57 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:57 -0600 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01CBLc5b049841; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:21:54 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Murray , Vidya Sagar , Athani Nadeem Ladkhan , Tom Joseph CC: , , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI: endpoint: Assign function number for each PF in EPC core Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:55:14 +0530 Message-ID: <20200212112514.2000-6-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20200212112514.2000-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org The PCIe endpoint core relies on the drivers that invoke the pci_epc_add_epf() API to allocate and assign a function number to each physical function (PF). Since endpoint function device can be created by multiple mechanisms (configfs, devicetree, etc..), allowing each of these mechanisms to assign a function number would result in mutliple endpoint function devices having the same function number. In order to avoid this, let EPC core assign a function number to the endpoint device. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 27 +++++---------------------- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- include/linux/pci-epc.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c index d1288a0bd530..e7e8367eead1 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct pci_epc_group { struct config_group group; struct pci_epc *epc; bool start; - unsigned long function_num_map; }; static inline struct pci_epf_group *to_pci_epf_group(struct config_item *item) @@ -89,37 +88,22 @@ static int pci_epc_epf_link(struct config_item *epc_item, struct config_item *epf_item) { int ret; - u32 func_no = 0; struct pci_epf_group *epf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_item); struct pci_epc_group *epc_group = to_pci_epc_group(epc_item); struct pci_epc *epc = epc_group->epc; struct pci_epf *epf = epf_group->epf; - func_no = find_first_zero_bit(&epc_group->function_num_map, - BITS_PER_LONG); - if (func_no >= BITS_PER_LONG) - return -EINVAL; - - set_bit(func_no, &epc_group->function_num_map); - epf->func_no = func_no; - ret = pci_epc_add_epf(epc, epf); if (ret) - goto err_add_epf; + return ret; ret = pci_epf_bind(epf); - if (ret) - goto err_epf_bind; + if (ret) { + pci_epc_remove_epf(epc, epf); + return ret; + } return 0; - -err_epf_bind: - pci_epc_remove_epf(epc, epf); - -err_add_epf: - clear_bit(func_no, &epc_group->function_num_map); - - return ret; } static void pci_epc_epf_unlink(struct config_item *epc_item, @@ -134,7 +118,6 @@ static void pci_epc_epf_unlink(struct config_item *epc_item, epc = epc_group->epc; epf = epf_group->epf; - clear_bit(epf->func_no, &epc_group->function_num_map); pci_epf_unbind(epf); pci_epc_remove_epf(epc, epf); } diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c index e51a12ed85bb..dc1c673534e0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c @@ -471,22 +471,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_write_header); */ int pci_epc_add_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf) { + u32 func_no; + int ret = 0; + if (epf->epc) return -EBUSY; if (IS_ERR(epc)) return -EINVAL; - if (epf->func_no > epc->max_functions - 1) - return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&epc->lock); + func_no = find_first_zero_bit(&epc->function_num_map, + BITS_PER_LONG); + if (func_no >= BITS_PER_LONG) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto ret; + } + + if (func_no > epc->max_functions - 1) { + dev_err(&epc->dev, "Exceeding max supported Function Number\n"); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto ret; + } + set_bit(func_no, &epc->function_num_map); + epf->func_no = func_no; epf->epc = epc; - mutex_lock(&epc->lock); list_add_tail(&epf->list, &epc->pci_epf); + +ret: mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); - return 0; + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_add_epf); @@ -503,6 +520,7 @@ void pci_epc_remove_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf) return; mutex_lock(&epc->lock); + clear_bit(epf->func_no, &epc->function_num_map); list_del(&epf->list); epf->epc = NULL; mutex_unlock(&epc->lock); diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epc.h b/include/linux/pci-epc.h index 4e3e527c49d1..ccaf6e3fa931 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epc.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epc.h @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct pci_epc_mem { * @max_functions: max number of functions that can be configured in this EPC * @group: configfs group representing the PCI EPC device * @lock: mutex to protect pci_epc ops + * @function_num_map: bitmap to manage physical function number * @notifier: used to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup) */ struct pci_epc { @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ struct pci_epc { struct config_group *group; /* mutex to protect against concurrent access of EP controller */ struct mutex lock; + unsigned long function_num_map; struct atomic_notifier_head notifier; };