From patchwork Tue Jun 11 13:58:34 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yue Haibing X-Patchwork-Id: 1113828 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-netdev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45NWp12qy3z9sBp for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 23:59:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388887AbfFKN7Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:59:16 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:40820 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387486AbfFKN7Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:59:16 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0D69CAE14E088B916F71; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:59:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.133.213.239) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:59:05 +0800 From: YueHaibing To: , , , , CC: , , YueHaibing Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: sja1105: Make two functions static Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:58:34 +0800 Message-ID: <20190611135834.21080-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.2.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.133.213.239] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Fix sparse warnings: drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c:1848:6: warning: symbol 'sja1105_port_rxtstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c:1869:6: warning: symbol 'sja1105_port_txtstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: YueHaibing Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean --- drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c index 81e1ba5..9395e8f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c @@ -1845,8 +1845,8 @@ static void sja1105_rxtstamp_work(struct work_struct *work) } /* Called from dsa_skb_defer_rx_timestamp */ -bool sja1105_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, - struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type) +static bool sja1105_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, + struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type) { struct sja1105_private *priv = ds->priv; struct sja1105_tagger_data *data = &priv->tagger_data; @@ -1866,8 +1866,8 @@ bool sja1105_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, * the skb and have it available in DSA_SKB_CB in the .port_deferred_xmit * callback, where we will timestamp it synchronously. */ -bool sja1105_port_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, - struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type) +static bool sja1105_port_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, + struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type) { struct sja1105_private *priv = ds->priv; struct sja1105_port *sp = &priv->ports[port];