From patchwork Mon Jun 13 20:38:42 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Waldemar Brodkorb X-Patchwork-Id: 634846 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from helium.openadk.org (helium.openadk.org [IPv6:2a00:1828:2000:679::23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rT4PM1cKqz9s0M for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:38:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: from helium.openadk.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by helium.openadk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335BB10136; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:38:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: devel@uclibc-ng.org Delivered-To: devel@helium.openadk.org Received: by helium.openadk.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E11C10134; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:38:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:38:42 +0200 From: Waldemar Brodkorb To: Alexey Brodkin Message-ID: <20160613203842.GF2584@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <1465820208.4130.11.camel@synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1465820208.4130.11.camel@synopsys.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "devel@uclibc-ng.org" , Vineet Gupta , "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] Patches for ARC X-BeenThere: devel@uclibc-ng.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: uClibc-ng Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devel-bounces@uclibc-ng.org Sender: "devel" Hi Alexey, Alexey Brodkin wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > Just saw that new change for ARC ("arc: use generic lowlevellock", > http://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=1b49dc96d103e0151fee290d55cea55aa12c906d). > > Even though this is very nice to see fixes and improvements done by people > outside Synopsys IMHO it still makes sense to add SNPS people in the loop so > we may review submitted patches. You are right, I first thought I need to add you, then I thought you are reading the low traffic list anyway. Sorry for the trouble. > So could you please first get an Ack from either Vineet (in Cc) or me before > committing stuff for ARC? Alternatively just Cc linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org. I will do in the future. Do you thing following patch would be okay to commit to make changes to architecture specific parts more formal? > Again I'm very happy with uClibc-ng and appreciate a lot all your efforts > and to make uClibc-ng more robust let's review stuff together. > > Also it was hard for me to find a relevant patch on the mailing list > because I was expecting patch to be sent via git "send-email" (which I think > should be a standard way for patch submissions in uClibc). Only going through a relevant > thread for ARM I found a message with attached files. Is the commit okay or do I need to revert it? @Max: Okay to add you as Xtensa maintainer? best regards Waldemar From 14b15ceb1e98ff9a3cacd99bc1a77ce02e8c8684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Waldemar Brodkorb Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:32:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] add MAINTAINERS information Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb --- MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 MAINTAINERS diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cecfb24 --- /dev/null +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +Maintainer: Waldemar Brodkorb + +Acrhitecture specific maintainers, Acked-By needed for any architecture +specific changes: + +ARC: +Alexey Brodkin +Vineet Gupta + +Xtensa: +Max Filippov -- 1.7.10.4