From 271465fe4695618b8a682934b9234ad387f21c36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:23:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Ensure all vcpus are consistent with in-kernel
irqchip settings
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971685
CVE-2012-1601
If some vcpus are created before KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP, then
irqchip_in_kernel() and vcpu->arch.apic will be inconsistent, leading
to potential NULL pointer dereferences.
Fix by:
- ensuring that no vcpus are installed when KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP is called
- ensuring that a vcpu has an apic if it is installed after KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP
This is somewhat long winded because vcpu->arch.apic is created without
kvm->lock held.
Based on earlier patch by Michael Ellerman.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
(back ported from commit 3e515705a1f46beb1c942bb8043c16f8ac7b1e9e)
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
---
arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 5 +++++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++++
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
@@ -1185,6 +1185,11 @@ out:
#define PALE_RESET_ENTRY 0x80000000ffffffb0UL
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kcm) == (vcpu->arch.apic != NULL);
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *v;
@@ -2285,6 +2285,9 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
}
} else
goto out;
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
+ goto out;
r = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
if (r) {
kfree(kvm->arch.vpic);
@@ -5007,6 +5010,11 @@ void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *rtn)
kvm_x86_ops->check_processor_compatibility(rtn);
}
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) == (vcpu->arch.apic != NULL);
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct page *page;
@@ -557,5 +557,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return vcpu->kvm->bsp_vcpu_id == vcpu->vcpu_id;
}
+
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+#else
+
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return true; }
+
#endif
#endif
@@ -1872,6 +1872,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
goto vcpu_destroy;
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ if (!kvm_vcpu_compatible(vcpu)) {
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
+ }
if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) == KVM_MAX_VCPUS) {
r = -EINVAL;
goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
--
1.7.9.5
On 04/25/2012 02:15 PM, Tim Gardner wrote: > Given the extra cherry-pick, I'm resubmitting these patches. Pay particular attention to kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() because my backport is slightly different then Brad's. rtg