@@ -288,6 +288,14 @@ struct x86_cpu_desc {
.x86_microcode_rev = (revision), \
}
+#define AMD_CPU_DESC(fam, model, stepping, revision) { \
+ .x86_family = (fam), \
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_AMD, \
+ .x86_model = (model), \
+ .x86_stepping = (stepping), \
+ .x86_microcode_rev = (revision), \
+}
+
extern const struct x86_cpu_id *x86_match_cpu(const struct x86_cpu_id *match);
extern bool x86_cpu_has_min_microcode_rev(const struct x86_cpu_desc *table);
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
#include <asm/cpu.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
#include <asm/spec-ctrl.h>
#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <asm/numa.h>
@@ -925,6 +926,11 @@ static void init_amd_bd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
clear_rdrand_cpuid_bit(c);
}
+static const struct x86_cpu_desc erratum_1386_microcode[] = {
+ AMD_CPU_DESC(0x17, 0x1, 0x2, 0x0800126e),
+ AMD_CPU_DESC(0x17, 0x31, 0x0, 0x08301052),
+};
+
static void fix_erratum_1386(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
/*
@@ -934,7 +940,13 @@ static void fix_erratum_1386(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
*
* Affected parts all have no supervisor XSAVE states, meaning that
* the XSAVEC instruction (which works fine) is equivalent.
+ *
+ * Clear the feature flag only on microcode revisions which
+ * don't have the fix.
*/
+ if (x86_cpu_has_min_microcode_rev(erratum_1386_microcode))
+ return;
+
clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
}