From patchwork Tue Jun 25 06:53:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hui Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 1951940 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=185.125.189.65; helo=lists.ubuntu.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ubuntu.com (lists.ubuntu.com [185.125.189.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W7bBw524mz20X1 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:53:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.ubuntu.com) by lists.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sM03N-0001nz-Ll; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:53:21 +0000 Received: from smtp-relay-canonical-0.internal ([10.131.114.83] helo=smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com) by lists.ubuntu.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sM03M-0001nH-Ac for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:53:20 +0000 Received: from hwang4-ThinkPad-T14s-Gen-2a.conference (unknown [103.229.218.199]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8F1B40149 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:53:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Hui Wang To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [SRU][Noble][PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/display: Extract code required to calculate max qgv/psf gv point Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:53:03 +0800 Message-Id: <20240625065307.11681-3-hui.wang@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240625065307.11681-1-hui.wang@canonical.com> References: <20240625065307.11681-1-hui.wang@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: Stanislav Lisovskiy BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070158 We need that in order to force disable SAGV in next patch. Also it is beneficial to separate that code, as in majority cases, when SAGV is enabled, we don't even need those calculations. Also we probably need to determine max PSF GV point as well, however currently we don't do that when we disable SAGV, which might be actually causing some issues in that case. v2: - Introduce helper adl_qgv_bw(counterpart to adl_psf_bw) (Ville Syrjälä) - Don't restrict psf gv points for SAGV disable case (Ville Syrjälä) v3: - Update icl_max_bw_qgv_point_mask to return max qgv point mask (Vinod) v4: - Minor changes in icl_find_qgv_points (Vinod) v5: - use max_bw_point instead of max_bw_point_mask (stan) Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240405113533.338553-3-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 193caff1369e7dcfb9dafd69451b6e3a8d8caa85) Signed-off-by: Hui Wang --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 80 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c index 77886cc21211..963c9e57a5d5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c @@ -661,6 +661,22 @@ static unsigned int adl_psf_bw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, return bi->psf_bw[psf_gv_point]; } +static unsigned int icl_qgv_bw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, + int num_active_planes, int qgv_point) +{ + unsigned int idx; + + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12) + idx = tgl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, qgv_point); + else + idx = icl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, qgv_point); + + if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(i915->display.bw.max)) + return 0; + + return i915->display.bw.max[idx].deratedbw[qgv_point]; +} + void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv)) @@ -806,6 +822,35 @@ intel_atomic_get_bw_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state) return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state); } +static unsigned int icl_max_bw_qgv_point_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915, + int num_active_planes) +{ + unsigned int num_qgv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points; + unsigned int max_bw_point = 0; + unsigned int max_bw = 0; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) { + unsigned int max_data_rate = + icl_qgv_bw(i915, num_active_planes, i); + + /* + * We need to know which qgv point gives us + * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV + * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time + * with watermarks. By that moment we already + * have those, as it is calculated earlier in + * intel_atomic_check, + */ + if (max_data_rate > max_bw) { + max_bw_point = BIT(i); + max_bw = max_data_rate; + } + } + + return max_bw_point; +} + static int mtl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int data_rate, unsigned int num_active_planes, @@ -883,8 +928,6 @@ static int icl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state, struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state) { - unsigned int max_bw_point = 0; - unsigned int max_bw = 0; unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_psf_gv_points; unsigned int num_qgv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points; u16 psf_points = 0; @@ -897,31 +940,8 @@ static int icl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915, return ret; for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) { - unsigned int idx; - unsigned int max_data_rate; - - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12) - idx = tgl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, i); - else - idx = icl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, i); - - if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(i915->display.bw.max)) - continue; - - max_data_rate = i915->display.bw.max[idx].deratedbw[i]; - - /* - * We need to know which qgv point gives us - * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV - * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time - * with watermarks. By that moment we already - * have those, as it is calculated earlier in - * intel_atomic_check, - */ - if (max_data_rate > max_bw) { - max_bw_point = i; - max_bw = max_data_rate; - } + unsigned int max_data_rate = icl_qgv_bw(i915, + num_active_planes, i); if (max_data_rate >= data_rate) qgv_points |= BIT(i); @@ -965,9 +985,9 @@ static int icl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915, * cause. */ if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(i915, new_bw_state)) { - qgv_points = BIT(max_bw_point); - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "No SAGV, using single QGV point %d\n", - max_bw_point); + qgv_points = icl_max_bw_qgv_point_mask(i915, num_active_planes); + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "No SAGV, using single QGV point mask 0x%x\n", + qgv_points); } /*