diff mbox series

[SRU,F,I,J,3/6] nbd: don't handle response without a corresponding request message

Message ID 20220622051731.23563-4-matthew.ruffell@canonical.com
State New
Headers show
Series nbd: requests can become stuck when disconnecting from server with qemu-nbd | expand

Commit Message

Matthew Ruffell June 22, 2022, 5:17 a.m. UTC 
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896350

While handling a response message from server, nbd_read_stat() will
try to get request by tag, and then complete the request. However,
this is problematic if nbd haven't sent a corresponding request
message:

t1                      t2
                        submit_bio
                         nbd_queue_rq
                          blk_mq_start_request
recv_work
 nbd_read_stat
  blk_mq_tag_to_rq
 blk_mq_complete_request
                          nbd_send_cmd

Thus add a new cmd flag 'NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT', it will be set in
nbd_send_cmd() and checked in nbd_read_stat().

Noted that this patch can't fix that blk_mq_tag_to_rq() might
return a freed request, and this will be fixed in following
patches.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210916093350.1410403-2-yukuai3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
(cherry picked from 4e6eef5dc25b528e08ac5b5f64f6ca9d9987241d)
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/block/nbd.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
index 92f5ab1216ed..a1d5005ea035 100644
--- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -131,6 +131,12 @@  struct nbd_device {
 };
 
 #define NBD_CMD_REQUEUED	1
+/*
+ * This flag will be set if nbd_queue_rq() succeed, and will be checked and
+ * cleared in completion. Both setting and clearing of the flag are protected
+ * by cmd->lock.
+ */
+#define NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT	2
 
 struct nbd_cmd {
 	struct nbd_device *nbd;
@@ -405,6 +411,7 @@  static enum blk_eh_timer_return nbd_xmit_timeout(struct request *req,
 	if (!mutex_trylock(&cmd->lock))
 		return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
 
+	__clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
 	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&nbd->config_refs)) {
 		cmd->status = BLK_STS_TIMEOUT;
 		mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
@@ -734,6 +741,12 @@  static struct nbd_cmd *nbd_read_stat(struct nbd_device *nbd, int index)
 	cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
 
 	mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
+	if (!__test_and_clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) {
+		dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "Suspicious reply %d (status %u flags %lu)",
+			tag, cmd->status, cmd->flags);
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto out;
+	}
 	if (cmd->cmd_cookie != nbd_handle_to_cookie(handle)) {
 		dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "Double reply on req %p, cmd_cookie %u, handle cookie %u\n",
 			req, cmd->cmd_cookie, nbd_handle_to_cookie(handle));
@@ -833,6 +846,7 @@  static bool nbd_clear_req(struct request *req, void *data, bool reserved)
 		return true;
 
 	mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
+	__clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
 	cmd->status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
 	mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
 
@@ -969,7 +983,13 @@  static int nbd_handle_cmd(struct nbd_cmd *cmd, int index)
 	 * returns EAGAIN can be retried on a different socket.
 	 */
 	ret = nbd_send_cmd(nbd, cmd, index);
-	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+	/*
+	 * Access to this flag is protected by cmd->lock, thus it's safe to set
+	 * the flag after nbd_send_cmd() succeed to send request to server.
+	 */
+	if (!ret)
+		__set_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
+	else if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
 		dev_err_ratelimited(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk),
 				    "Request send failed, requeueing\n");
 		nbd_mark_nsock_dead(nbd, nsock, 1);