From patchwork Fri Oct 29 20:36:23 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo X-Patchwork-Id: 1548285 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=canonical.com header.i=@canonical.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210705 header.b=mC5asYmw; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HgvRm2YSpz9sXM for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 07:39:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgYeo-0001oo-6S; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:39:22 +0000 Received: from smtp-relay-canonical-0.internal ([10.131.114.83] helo=smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgYei-0001kq-7b for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:39:16 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (1.general.cascardo.us.vpn [10.172.70.58]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 252863F174 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:39:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1635539956; bh=qV0hfyiH4yiAngw/wCVm1QcfrkkmBeW4tbVKDOrFF6w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=mC5asYmwK4QidLnrxtUA3hoXI9bNf1x2mfIK8ljo+DNLHKdNN+y3C7WAKV64417Zi jQU0p6NAhVGVT/58ZAktOEID7/LTHP4+1ipYnIadGe+l/xUqab1MpAuqEHRDGJ1Yuw QMY9ST4avglyW4XZFQ1WZ2nlY0evuYq8dvnBVtHr1/6cDMgGkme3UH6Wq3sOCbwCI+ l1+xjhoB+tU9daoWzohjX2UFmJ527sQ0g/G8cslyMTi2c29H5Dg4W2Quqp2wn9+Osk AneVWnUx6u5efcwo4SrDwHmw9HQBN4aPvggmuH/26JmYuVpCKZp/dX9LpyGe8drM+w ARpusXCEXcXfw== From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [SRU Bionic 3/4] bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:36:23 -0300 Message-Id: <20211029203624.1367572-4-cascardo@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20211029203624.1367572-1-cascardo@canonical.com> References: <20211029203624.1367572-1-cascardo@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: Daniel Borkmann BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934414 Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new test cases. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov (backported from commit 21ccaf21497b72f42133182716a42dbf573d314b) [cascardo: Fixed conflict around header as limits.h was already included] [cascardo: omitted hunks that add 3 call tests, that would require commit cc8b0b92a1699bc32f7fec71daa2bfc90de43a4d ("bpf: introduce function calls (function boundaries)")] [cascardo: omitted the changes to "unknown opcode XX", this requires commit 5e581dad4fec0e6d062740dc35b8dc248b39d224] Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo --- lib/test_bpf.c | 8 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 242 +++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index 49da3625032f..d89d9d8da469 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -2004,10 +2004,14 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { { { 4, 0 }, { 5, 10 } } }, { - "INT: DIV by zero", + /* This one doesn't go through verifier, but is just raw insn + * as opposed to cBPF tests from here. Thus div by 0 tests are + * done in test_verifier in BPF kselftests. + */ + "INT: DIV by -1", .u.insns_int = { BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R6, R1), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, -1), BPF_LD_ABS(BPF_B, 3), BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, R0, R7), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 7f28618de35e..f3cf249030e6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "DIV32 by 0, zero check 2", @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "DIV64 by 0, zero check", @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "MOD32 by 0, zero check 1", @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "MOD32 by 0, zero check 2", @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "MOD64 by 0, zero check", @@ -172,8 +172,240 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check ok, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 8, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check 1, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check 2, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 0, }, + { + "DIV64 by 0, zero check, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check ok, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 3), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 5), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 2, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check 1, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check 2, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "MOD64 by 0, zero check 1, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 2, + }, + { + "MOD64 by 0, zero check 2, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = -1, + }, + /* Just make sure that JITs used udiv/umod as otherwise we get + * an exception from INT_MIN/-1 overflow similarly as with div + * by zero. + */ + { + "DIV32 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV32 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV64 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV64 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "MOD32 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = INT_MIN, + }, + { + "MOD32 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = INT_MIN, + }, + { + "MOD64 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "MOD64 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "xor32 zero extend check", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, 0xffff), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_2, 0, 1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, { "empty prog", .insns = {