From patchwork Wed May 26 15:11:28 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo X-Patchwork-Id: 1484086 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FqvYk5dLhz9sRN; Thu, 27 May 2021 01:11:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llvCJ-0003Qk-Ih; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:11:51 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llvCH-0003QB-TV for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:11:49 +0000 Received: from [177.198.111.192] (helo=mussarela..) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1llvCH-00036l-6n for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:11:49 +0000 From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [SRU Focal/linux-oem-5.10 1/2] Revert "net/sctp: fix race condition in sctp_destroy_sock" Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 12:11:28 -0300 Message-Id: <20210526151129.16141-3-cascardo@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210526151129.16141-1-cascardo@canonical.com> References: <20210526151129.16141-1-cascardo@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: Xin Long This reverts commit b166a20b07382b8bc1dcee2a448715c9c2c81b5b. This one has to be reverted as it introduced a dead lock, as syzbot reported: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); lock(slock-AF_INET6); lock(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); lock(slock-AF_INET6); CPU0 is the thread of sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(), and CPU1 is that of sctp_close(). The original issue this commit fixed will be fixed in the next patch. Reported-by: syzbot+959223586843e69a2674@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Xin Long Signed-off-by: David S. Miller (cherry picked from commit 01bfe5e8e428b475982a98a46cca5755726f3f7f) CVE-2021-23133 Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo --- net/sctp/socket.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 9463c54c465a..53d0a4161df3 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -1520,9 +1520,11 @@ static void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) /* Supposedly, no process has access to the socket, but * the net layers still may. + * Also, sctp_destroy_sock() needs to be called with addr_wq_lock + * held and that should be grabbed before socket lock. */ - local_bh_disable(); - bh_lock_sock(sk); + spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); + bh_lock_sock_nested(sk); /* Hold the sock, since sk_common_release() will put sock_put() * and we have just a little more cleanup. @@ -1531,7 +1533,7 @@ static void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) sk_common_release(sk); bh_unlock_sock(sk); - local_bh_enable(); + spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); sock_put(sk); @@ -4937,6 +4939,9 @@ static int sctp_init_sock(struct sock *sk) sk_sockets_allocated_inc(sk); sock_prot_inuse_add(net, sk->sk_prot, 1); + /* Nothing can fail after this block, otherwise + * sctp_destroy_sock() will be called without addr_wq_lock held + */ if (net->sctp.default_auto_asconf) { spin_lock(&sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock); list_add_tail(&sp->auto_asconf_list, @@ -4971,9 +4976,7 @@ static void sctp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk) if (sp->do_auto_asconf) { sp->do_auto_asconf = 0; - spin_lock_bh(&sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock); list_del(&sp->auto_asconf_list); - spin_unlock_bh(&sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock); } sctp_endpoint_free(sp->ep); local_bh_disable();